This paper presents a method to segment airplane radar tracks in high density terminal areas where the air traffic follows trajectories with several changes in heading, speed and altitude. The radar tracks are modelled with different types of segments, straight lines, cubic spline function and shape preserving cubic function. The longitudinal, lateral and vertical deviations are calculated for terminal manoeuvring area scenarios. The most promising model of the radar tracks resulted from a mixed interpolation using straight lines for linear segments and spline cubic functions for curved segments. A sensitivity analysis is used to optimise the size of the window for the segmentation process.
Marks BL. Air traffic control separation standards and collision risk, royal aircraft establishment, Tech. Note No. Math. 91, 1963.
5.
ReichPG. Analysis of long range air traffic systems separation standards I, II & III. J Inst Navig1966; 19: 88169331–98186347.
6.
ICAO, Report of the review of the general concept of separation panel. In: Sixth meeting, Montreal, Canada, ICAO, 28 November–15 December 1988.
7.
Bakker GJ and Blom HAP. Air traffic collision risk modelling, NLR. In: Procedures 32nd IEEE conference on decision and control, San Antonio, TX, 1993, pp.1464–1469. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
8.
BrookerP. Radar inaccuracies and mid-air collision risk: Part 2 en route radar separation minima. J Navig2004; 57: 39–51.
9.
Carpenter BD and Kuchar JK. Probability-based collision alerting logic for closely-spaced parallel approach. In: 35th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 1997, AIAA paper 1997-222 Reston, VA: AIAA.
10.
Powell JD and Sharon H. Assessment of the possibility of a midair collision during an ultra closely spaced parallel approach. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001, AIAA paper 2001-4205. Reston, VA: AIAA.
11.
Kuchar JK and Winder LF. Generalized philosophy of alerting with applications to parallel approach collision prevention. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001, AIAA paper 2001-4052. Reston, VA: AIAA.
12.
WinderLFKucharJK. Evaluation of collision avoidance maneuvers for parallel approach. J Guid Control Dyn1999; 22: 801–807.
13.
Powell JD. Assessment of the possibility of a midair collision during an ultra closely spaced parallel approach. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001, AIAA paper 2001-4205. Reston, VA: AIAA.
14.
Shepherd R, Cassell R, Rannoch T, et al. A reduced aircraft separation risk assessment model. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, New Orleans, LA, Collection of Technical Papers, 1997, Pt. 3 (A97-37001 10-63), AIAA paper 1997-3735. Reston, VA: AIAA.
15.
Garcia E. Development of a 3-dimensional mathematical collision risk model based on recorded aircraft trajectories to estimate the safety level in high density en-route airspaces. PhD Thesis. Spain: Polytechnical University of Madrid, 2013.
16.
Sáez F, Arnaldo R, Garcia E, et al. Development of a three-dimensional collision risk model tool to assess safety in high density en-route airspaces. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2010; 224: 1119–1129.
17.
Burt L. 3-D Mathematical Model for ECAC Upper Airspace, EUROCONTROL, Final Report, 2000.
Garcia E and Sáez F. Development of analytical tools based on the application of the 3-dimensional mathematical collision risk model to radar data, Eurocontrol, 2006, MDG/35DP/10.
20.
Garcia E, Sáez F and Izquierdo I. Identification and analysis of proximate events in high density enroute airspaces. In: 7th USA/Europe ATM R&D seminar, Barcelona, Spain, 2–5 July 2007 (accessed 5 July 2009). Available at: http://www.atmseminar.org.
21.
Burt L. Results of turn identification applied to Maastricht radar data for 3-D collision risk modelling, Eurocontrol, 2005, MDG/31 DP/08.
22.
De Boor C. A practical guide to splines. Applied mathematical sciences, vol. 27. New York-Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
