Modified Dubins parameterization for aircraft emergency trajectory planning

Abstract

This paper presents a trajectory parameterization method for calculating emergency flight paths with variable airspeeds under conditions of constant wind. The method is based on the Dubins curve; however, it has been modified to allow for acceleration along the path and finite rate of change in turn rate. The aircraft’s planar trajectory from an initial condition to a terminal condition is parameterized into a small set of path-defining variables. The method uses a number of closed-form solutions and simple iteration schemes to efficiently calculate a path that meets the specified constraints. The parametrized path can then be optimized to minimize a performance objective for real-time emergency path planning. For emergency flight planning, the vertical degree of freedom is treated as a function of the aircraft state and parametric controls, and the optimization is formulated to ensure touchdown at a desired location and aircraft state. The performance of the proposed method is investigated using several test cases, including landing of a commercial jet following total loss of thrust and autorotative recovery of a utility helicopter following total loss of power.

Keywords

Path planning aircraft emergency trajectory Dubins parameterization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Betts

. Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization. J Guid Control Dyn 1998; 21: 193–207.

Kelly

Nagy

. Reactive nonholonomic trajectory generation via parametric optimal control. Int J Robot Res 2003; 22: 583–602.

Werling M, Ziegler J, Kammel S, et al. Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a frenet frame. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Anchorage, Alaska, USA, May 2010, pp.987–993.

Dubins

. On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math 1957; 79: 497–516.

Dubins

. On plane curves with curvature. Pacific J Math 1961; 11: 471–481.

Boissonnat JD, Ćeŕezo A and Leblond J. Shortest paths of bounded curvature in the plane. In: Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Nice, France, 1992.

McNeely

Iyer

Chandler

. Tour planning for an unmanned air vehicle under wind conditions. J Guid Control Dyn 2007; 30: 1299–1306.

Ambrosino

Ariola

Ciniglio

. Path generation and tracking in 3D for UAVs. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2009; 17: 980–988.

Savla K, Bullo F and Frazzoli E. On traveling salesperson problems for Dubins’ vehicle: Stochastic and dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on decision and control, Seville, Spain, December 2005, pp.4530–4535.

10.

Savla K, Bullo F and Frazzoli E. The coverage problem for loitering Dubins’ vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, December 2007, pp.1398–1403.

11.

Chitsaz H and Lavalle SM. Time-optimal paths for a Dubins airplane. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, December 2007, pp.2379–2384.

12.

Oren

Yerach

. Fast and efficient visible trajectories planning for the Dubins UAV model in 3D built-up environments. Robotica 2014; 32: 143–163.

13.

Ariff

. Waypoint navigation of small-scale UAV incorporating dynamic soaring. J Navig 2011; 64: 29–44.

14.

Atkins

Portillo

Strube

. Emergency flight planning applied to total loss of thrust. J Aircraft 2006; 43: 1205–1216.

15.

Holsten J, Loechelt S and Alles W. Autonomous autorotation flights of helicopter UAVs to known landing sites. In: American helicopter society 66^th annual forum, Phoenix, AZ, 2010.

16.

Slegers

Yakimenko

. Terminal guidance of autonomous parafoils in high wind-to-airspeed ratios. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2011; 225: 336–346.

17.

Rademacher

Strahan

. In-flight trajectory planning and guidance for autonomous parafoils. J Guid Control Dyn 2009; 6: 1697–1712.

18.

Larson RA, Pachter M and Mears M. Path planning by unmanned air vehicles for engaging an integrated radar network. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, California, USA, 15–18 August 2005.

19.

McGee TG, Spry S and Hedrick JK. Optimal path planning in a constant wind with a bounded turning rate. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, Reston, VA, USA, August 2005, pp.1–11.

20.

Techy

Woolsey

. Minimum-time path planning for unmanned aerial vehicles in steady uniform winds. J Guid Control Dyn 2009; 32: 1736–1746.

21.

Fraichard

Scheuer

. From Reeds and Shepp’s to continuous-curvature paths. IEEE Trans Robot 2004; 20: 1025–1035.

22.

National Transportation Safety Board. Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson River − US Airways Flight 1549. Aviation Accident Report, NTSB/AAR-10/03, PB2010-910403.

23.

Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Diagram, NE-2, Airport/Facility Directory, 25 July 2013 to 22 August 2013.

24.

Aponso BL, Lee D and Bachelder EN. Evaluation of a rotorcraft autorotation training display on a commercial flight training device. In: Proceedings of American Helicopter Society 61st annual forum, Grapevine, TX, USA, 2005.

25.

Yomchinda T, Horn JF and Langelaan JW. Flight path planning for descent-phase helicopter autorotation. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Portland, Oregon, USA, 7–11 August 2011.

26.

Yomchinda T, Horn JF and Langelaan JW. Autonomous control and path planning for autorotation of unmanned helicopters. In: Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society 68th Annual Forum, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1–3 May 2012.