Guidance,navigation and control for autonomous R-bar proximity operations for geostationary satellites

Abstract

R-bar refers to the local vertical axis pointing radially upward in a satellite-fixed reference frame. Approaching a satellite along the R-bar, especially for rendezvous and docking to geostationary satellites, is advantageous in terms of safety considerations and flight time compared to other options. In this paper, a specialized study on autonomous R-bar proximity operations with respect to a geostationary target from a separation of several kilometers to a few hundreds of meters, commonly referred to as the closing phase, is carried out and a comprehensive solution for both attitude and orbit control in this scenario is proposed. An integrative design of the guidance, navigation, and control for R-bar proximity operations is presented. Impulsive R-bar hopping maneuvers are developed for the trajectory guidance. This method is shown to be passively safe and time efficient. The onboard sensors provide measurements of the line-of-sight, range to the target, attitude and angular velocity in the inertial frame. Due to the sensitivity of the sensor’s pointing in the far-range phase, a sliding mode attitude control law is introduced to align the optical axis with the line-of-sight to the target. Sensor measurements are fused and processed by an extended Kalman filter. Simulation results indicate that the proposed integrative guidance, navigation, and control algorithms are robust to uncertainties and noise, and can be used as a comprehensive solution for R-bar rendezvous and docking mission design during the closing phase.

Keywords

Rendezvous and docking R-bar proximity geostationary satellite impulsive hopping maneuver visual navigation attitude tracking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lamkin S and Mccandless W. Pathfinder autonomous rendezvous and docking project. NASA Johnson Space Center, 1990. NASA TM-102163.

Waltz

. On-orbit servicing of space systems, Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 1993.

Kawano

Mokuno

Kasai

. Result of autonomous rendezvous docking experiment of Engineering Test Satellite-VII. J Spacecraft Rockets 2001; 38: 105–111.

Weismuller T and Leinz M. GNC technology demonstrated by the orbital express autonomous rendezvous and capture sensor system. In: 29th annual AAS guidance and control conference, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, 2006, pp.1–9.

Rumford TE. Demonstration of autonomous rendezvous technology (DART) project summary. In: Proceedings of SPIE: The International Society for Optical Engineering. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003, pp.10–19.

Fehse

. Automated rendezvous and docking of spacecraft, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Wenfei W, Prathyush M, Declan B, et al. GNC technology demonstrated by the orbital express autonomous rendezvous and capture sensor system. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, 2012, pp.1–9.

Woffinden

Geller

. Navigating the road to autonomous orbital rendezvous. J Spacecraft Rockets 2007; 44.

Hablani

Tapper

Dana-Bashian

. Guidance and relative navigation for autonomous rendezvous in a circular orbit. J Guid Control Dyn 2002; 25: 553–562.

10.

Hablani

. Autonomous inertial relative navigation with sight-line-stabilized sensors for spacecraft rendezvous. J Guid Control Dyn 2009; 32: 172–183.

11.

. Geostationary satellites collocation, New York: Springer, 2014.

12.

Kim

Crassidis

Cheng

. Kalman filtering for relative spacecraft attitude and position estimation. J Guid Control Dyn 2007; 30: 133–143.

13.

Woffinden

Geller

. Relative angles-only navigation and pose estimation for autonomous orbital rendezvous. J Guid Control Dyn 2007; 30: 1455–1469.

14.

Mokuno

Kawano

. In-orbit demonstration of an optical navigation system for autonomous rendezvous docking. J Spacecraft Rockets 2011; 48: 1046–1054.

15.

Sun

Crassidis

. Observability analysis of six-degree-of-freedom configuration determination using vector observations. J Guid Control Dyn 2002; 25: 1149–1157.

16.

Geller

. Analysis of the relative attitude estimation and control problem for satellite inspection and orbital rendezvous. J Astronaut Sci 2007; 55: 195–214.

17.

Junkins JL, Hughes DC, Wazni KP, et al. Vision-based navigation for rendezvous and docking and proximity operations. In: 22nd annual AAS guidance and control conference, Breckenridge, CO, 1999, American Astronautical Society Paper 99-021.

18.

Gunnam

Hughes

Junkins

. A vision-based DSP embedded navigation sensor. IEEE Sens J 2002; 2: 428–442.

19.

Geller

Klein

. Angles-only navigation state observability during orbital proximity operations. J Guid Control Dyn 2014; 37: 1976–1983.

20.

Pelletier FJ, Golla DF and Allen A. Lidar-based rendezvous navigation for MSR. In: AIAA/AAS astrodynamics specialist conference and exhibit, Providence, RI, USA, 16–19 August 2004, pp.629–643.

21.

Titterton

Weston

. Strapdown inertial navigation technology 2004; vol. 17, Stevenage, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

22.

Segal

Gurfil

Shahid

. In-orbit tracking of resident space objects: A comparison of monocular and stereoscopic vision. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2014; 50: 676–676.

23.

Koji Y, Kiyomi Y, Katsuhiko Y, et al. Guidance and navigation system design of R-bar approach for rendezvous and docking. In: 17th AIAA international communications satellite systems conference and exhibit. Breckenridge, CO: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998, pp.1–9.

24.

Gurfil

Kholshevnikov

. Manifolds and metrics in the relative spacecraft motion problem. J Guid Control Dyn 2006; 29: 1004–1010.

25.

Clohessy

Wiltshire

. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. J Aerosp Sci 1960; 27: 653–658.

26.

Schaub

Junkins

. Analytical mechanics of space systems, Breckenridge, CO: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003.

27.

Wertz

. Spacecraft attitude determination and control 1978; vol. 73, New York: Springer.

28.

Shuster

. A survey of attitude representations. J Astronaut Sci 1993; 41: 439–517.

29.

Lefferts

Markley

Shuster

. Kalman filtering for spacecraft attitude estimation. J Guid Control Dyn 1982; 5: 417–429.

30.

Breger

How

. Safe trajectories for autonomous rendezvous of spacecraft. J Guid Control Dyn 2008; 31: 1478–1489.

31.

Hope AS and Trask AJ. Pulsed thrust method for hover formation flying. American Astronautical Society Paper 03-655, 2003.

32.

Lovell TA and Brown DL. Impulsive-hover satellite trajectory design for rendezvous and proximity operation missions. American Astronautical Society Paper 07-102, 2007.

33.

Farrenkopf

. Analytic steady-state accuracy solutions for two common spacecraft attitude estimators. J Guid Control Dyn 1978; 1: 282–284.

34.

Toda N, Hctsa J and Schleo F. SPARS: The system, algorithms, and test results. Aerospace Corporation, 1969.

35.

Lam QM and Crassidis JL. Precision attitude determination using a multiple model adaptive estimation scheme. In: IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, Montana, US, 2007, pp.1–20.

36.

Fisher HL, Shuster MD and Strikwerda TE. Attitude determination for the star tracker mission. In: AAS/AIAA astrodynamics specialist conference, Breckenridge, CO, Paper AAS 89-365, 1989, pp.139–150.

37.

Pittelkau

. Rotation vector in attitude estimation. J Guid Control Dyn 2003; 26: 855–860.

38.

Van Loan

. Computing integrals involving the matrix exponential. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1978; 23: 395–404.

39.

Reynolds

. Quaternion parameterization and a simple algorithm for global attitude estimation. J Guid Control Dyn 1998; 21: 669–672.

40.

Brown

Hwang

. Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering: With MATLAB exercises and solutions, 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 1997.

41.

Data Sheet RVS. Jena-Optronik GmbH, Jena, Deutschland, Germany, 2015.

42.

Data Sheet RVS 3000. Jena-Optronik GmbH, Jena, Deutschland, Germany, 2015.