The influence of end-wall roughness on the performance of the axial compressor stage was investigated with different values of roughness added to the hub and shroud surfaces of transonic compressor stage, NASA Stage 35. Firstly, the numerical code was validated against the experimental data, which were available from the open literature. Afterwards the model was applied to simulate the effect of end-wall roughness with different amplitudes of dimensionless sand-grain roughness height. Numerical results indicated that the increment of end-wall roughness caused the deterioration of compressor stage performance. To understand the mechanism behind, the distributions of loadings, losses and the detail flow situations near end-wall region were analyzed and discussed. The results show that the overall performance drop is mainly due to the thickened end-wall boundary layer. Near the hub region, the rough hub surface induces larger corner stall and the shock wave moves upstream. Meanwhile, the casing roughness leads to the slight increment of tip leakage mass flow and extension of blockage in the circumferential direction.
DiakunchakIS. Performance deterioration in industrial gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1992; 114: 161–168.
2.
BonsJP. A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines. J Turbomach2010; 132: 021004–021004.
3.
Ghenaiet A, Elder RL and Tan SC. Particles trajectories through an axial fan and performance degradation due to sand ingestion. In: ASME turbo expo 2001: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2001, pp.V001T03A079-V001T03A079.
Haq IU and Bu-Hazza AI. Modeling and computation of fouling of a 36MW multistage centrifugal compressor train operating in a cracked gas environment. In: ASME turbo expo 2001: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2001, pp.V002T03A007-V002T03A007.
6.
Basler B and Marx D. Heavy fuel operation at Limay Bataan power station. In: ASME turbo expo 2001: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2001, pp.V003T03A008-V003T03A008.
7.
Bons JP, Taylor RP, McClain ST, et al. The many faces of turbine surface roughness. In: ASME turbo expo 2001: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2001, pp.V003T01A042-V003T01A042.
8.
BammertKWoelkGU. The influence of the blading surface roughness on the aerodynamic behavior and characteristic of an axial compressor. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1980; 102: 283–287.
9.
SchafflerA. Experimental and analytical investigation of the effects of Reynolds number and blade surface roughness on multistage axial flow compressors. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1980; 102: 5–12.
10.
BonsJPTaylorRPMcClainST. The many faces of turbine surface roughness. J Turbomach2001; 123: 739–748.
11.
ZhangQLigraniPM. Aerodynamic losses of a cambered turbine vane: Influences of surface roughness and freestream turbulence intensity. J Turbomach2006; 128: 536–546.
12.
LeipoldRBoeseMFottnerL. The influence of technical surface roughness caused by precision forging on the flow around a highly loaded compressor cascade. J Turbomach2000; 122: 416–425.
13.
GbadeboSAHynesTPCumpstyNA. Influence of surface roughness on three-dimensional separation in axial compressors. J Turbomach2004; 126: 455–463.
14.
BackSCSohnJHSongSJ. Impact of surface roughness on compressor cascade performance. J Fluids Eng2010; 132: 064502–064502.
15.
BackSCHobsonGVSongSJ. Effects of Reynolds number and surface roughness magnitude and location on compressor cascade performance. J Turbomach2012; 134: 051013–051013.
16.
Syverud E and Bakken LE. The impact of surface roughness on axial compressor performance deterioration. In: ASME turbo expo 2006: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2006, pp.491–501.
SchlichtingHGerstenK. Boundary-layer theory, 8th ed. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2000.
19.
Yuan LQ and Kind RJ. Measurements and computations of compressible flow through a turbine cascade with surface roughness. In: ASME turbo expo 2006: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2006, pp.511–519.
20.
MoriniMPinelliMSpinaPR. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of fouling on axial compressor stages. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2010; 132: 072401–072401.
21.
AldiNMoriniMPinelliM. Performance evaluation of nonuniformly fouled axial compressor stages by means of computational fluid dynamics analyses. J Turbomach2014; 136: 021016–021016.
22.
Chen S, Sun S, Xu H, et al. Influence of local surface roughness of rotor blade on performance of an axial compressor stage. In: ASME turbo expo 2013: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME, 2013, pp.V06AT35A015-V06AT35A015.
23.
Rao NM, Gumusel B, Kavurmacioglu L, et al. Influence of casing roughness on the aerodynamic structure of tip vortices in an axial flow turbine. In: ASME turbo expo 2006: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME, 2006, pp.893–903.
24.
Vázquez R, Torre D, Partida F, et al. Influence of surface roughness on the profile and end-wall losses in low pressure turbines. In: ASME 2011 turbo expo: Turbine technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME, 2011, pp.877–886.
25.
Reid L and Moore RD. Design and overall performance of four highly loaded, high speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure-ratio core compressor. NASA-TP-1337, 1978.
26.
ANSYS CFX, User manual, Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc., 2011.
27.
ANSYS ICEM CFD, User manual, Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, Inc., 2011.
28.
CadorinMMoriniMPinelliM. Numerical analyses of high Reynolds number flow of high pressure fuel gas through rough pipes. Int J Hydrogen Energy2010; 35: 7568–7579.
29.
JimenezJ. Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2004; 36: 173–196.
30.
Roberts SK and Yaras MI. Boundary-Layer transition over rough surfaces with elevated free-stream turbulence. In: ASME turbo expo 2004: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2004, pp.105–118.
31.
SchreiberHASteinertWKuüstersB. Effects of Reynolds number and free-stream turbulence on boundary layer transition in a compressor cascade. J Turbomach2002; 124: 1–9.
