Numerical simulation of the airflow over a military aircraft with active intake

Abstract

The aim of the study presented herein is to numerically predict the behaviour of the airflow around a flying military aircraft with an active intake in which the airflow may enter and travel all the way up to the aerodynamic interface plane (the analytical interface between the inlet and engine). Computational fluid dynamics is used as the basic tool. The geometry created consists of a full-scale military aircraft exposed to different flight conditions. The flow results are mainly focused at the aerodynamic interface plane since the present study is a part of a greater research effort to estimate how the airflow distortion induced to the engine’s face due to the aircraft’s flight attitude, affects the embedded gas turbine’s performance. The obtained results were validated through a direct comparison against similar experimental ones, collected from a wind tunnel environment.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics aerodynamic interface plane gas turbine performance aircraft intake system airflow distortion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANSYS FLUENT 12.0. Theory guide, Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc, 2009.

Palmer JR. The TURBOMATCH scheme for aero/industrial gas turbine engine design point/off design performance calculation. SME, Thermal Power Group, Cranfield University, 1990.

Huband

Shang

Aftosmis

. Numerical simulation of an F-16 A at angle of attack. J Aircraft 1990; 27: 886–892.

Reue GL, Doberenz ME and Wilkins DD. Component aerodynamic load from 1/9-scale F-16A loads model. General Dynamics Report 16PR316, Fort Worth, TX, USA, May 1976.

http://www.airwar.ru/other/draw/f16cb52_aiv.html, 1-5-2014.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/f16/, 1-5-2014.

http://xyextract-graph-digitizer.soft112.com/, 1-5-2014.

https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Gambit/index.htm, 14-7-14.

Hawkins JE. YF-16 inlet design and performance. In: AIAA/SAE 10th propulsion conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 21–23 October 1974, AIAA 74-1062.

10.

Sóbester

. Tradeoffs in jet inlet design: A historical perspective. J Aircraft 2007; 44: 705–717.

11.

Triantafyllou

Nikolaidis

Diakostefanis

. Effect of inlet flow distortion on installed gas turbine performance. J Propul Power 2015; 2015-10-B36051.

12.

Weston KC. Energy conversion-The ebook, Ch. 5, 1992.

13.

Seddon

Goldsmith

. Intake aerodynamics, Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1999.

14.

Delaunay B. Sur la sphere vide, Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSSR, Mathematical and Natural Sciences Division, No. 6, 1934, pp.793–800.

15.

U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976, NASA-TM-X-74335.

16.

Jane’s AERO-ENGINES, 2007, Issue 21, Jane’s Information Group.

17.

Lee AS, Singh R and Probert SD. Modelling of the performance of a F100-PW229 equivalent engine under sea-level static conditions. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, AIAA 2009-5018, 2009.

18.

Salim SM and Cheah SC. Wall Y+ strategy for dealing with wall-bounded turbulent flow. In: Proceedings of the international multi conference of engineers and computer scientists, 18–20 March 2009, Hong Kong.

19.

Eggenspieler G. Turbulence modelling. ANSYS presentation, 14 May 2012.

20.

ANSYS FLUENT User’s guide, Release 14. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS, 2011.

21.

Triantafyllou

Nikolaidis

Diakostefanis

. Total pressure distortion levels at the aerodynamic interface plane of a military aircraft. Aeronaut J 2015; 119.