The effect of stiffness and geometric parameters on the nonlinear aeroelastic performance of high aspect ratio wings

Abstract

The increase in wing aspect ratio is gaining interest among aircraft designers in conventional and joined-wing configurations due to the higher lift-to-drag ratios and longer ranges. However, current transport aircraft have relatively small aspect ratios due their increased structural stiffness. The more flexible the wing is more prone to higher deflections under the same operating condition, which may result in a geometrical nonlinear behavior. This nonlinear effect can lead to the occurrence of aeroelastic instabilities such as flutter sooner than in an equivalent stiffer wing. In this work, the effect of important stiffness (inertia ratio and torsional stiffness) and geometric (sweep and dihedral angles) design parameters on aeroelastic performance of a rectangular high aspect ratio wing model is assessed. The torsional stiffness was observed to present a higher influence on the flutter speed than the inertia ratio. Here, the decrease of the inertia ratio and the increase of the torsional stiffness results in higher flutter and divergence speeds. With respect to the geometric parameters, it was observed that neither the sweep angle nor the dihedral angle variations caused a substantial influence on the flutter speed, which is mainly supported by the resulting smaller variations in torsion and bending stiffness due to the geometric changes.

Keywords

Nonlinear aeroelasticity high aspect ratio wings fluid–structure interaction flutter boundary prediction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Von Doenhoff

. Theory of wing sections, including a summary of airfoil data, New York: Dover Publications, 1959.

Abbas

de Vicente

Valero

. Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance. Aerosp Sci Technol 2013; 28: 100–132.

Torenbeek

. Advanced aircraft design. Aerospace Series, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Wolkovitch

. The joined wing: An overview. J Aircraft 1986; 23: 161–178.

Carrier G, Atinault O, Dequand S, et al. Investigation of a strut-braced wing configuration for future commercial transport. In: Proceedings of the 28th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, ICAS 2012, Brisbane, Australia, 2012.

McMasters

Kroo

. Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes. Aircraft Des 1998; 1: 217–242.

Cooper JE and Harmin MY. Dynamic aeroelastic prediction for geometrically nonlinear aircraft. In: Proceedings international forum on aeroelastiticy and structural dynamics, IFASD 2011, Paris, France, 2011.

Patil MJ, Hodges DH and Cesnik CES. Characterizing the effects of geometrical nonlinearities on aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wings. In: Proceedings of international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 1999, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, 1999.

Livne

Weisshaar

. Aeroelasticity of nonconventional airplane configurations - Past and future. J Aircraft 2003; 40: 1047–1065.

10.

Livne

. Future of airplane aeroelasticity. J Aircraft 2003; 40: 1066–1092.

11.

Patil

Hodges

. On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wing. J Fluid Struct 2004; 19: 905–915.

12.

Dowell

Tang

. Effects of geometric structural nonlinearity on flutter and limit cycle oscillations of high-aspect-ratio wings. J Fluid Struct 2004; 19: 291–306.

13.

Arena A, Lacarbonara W and Marzocca P. Nonlinear aeroelastic formulation for flexible high-aspect ratio wings via geometrically exact approach. In: Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Denver, CO, USA, 2011.

14.

Kampchen

Dafnis

Reimerdes

. Dynamic aero-structural response of an elastic wing model. J Fluids Struct 2003; 18: 63–77.

15.

Drela M. Integrated simulation model for preliminary aerodynamic, structural, and control-law design of aircraft. In: Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Saint Louis, MO, USA, 1999. AIAA Paper 99-1394.

16.

Patil

Hodges

. Flight dynamics of highly flexible flying wings. J Aircraft 2006; 43: 1790–1799.

17.

Patil MJ. Nonlinear gust response of highly flexible aircraft. In: Proceedings of 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2007.

18.

Chang

Hodges

Patil

. Flight dynamics of highly flexible aircraft. J Aircraft 2008; 45: 538–545.

19.

Sotoudeh Z and Hodges DH. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of joined-wing aircraft with intrinsic equations. In: Proceedings of 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, 2009. AIAA Paper 2009-2464.

20.

Cesnik CES and Brown EL. Modeling of a high aspect ratio active flexible wings for roll control. In: Proceedings of 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Denver, CO, USA, 2002.

21.

Cesnik CES and Brown EL. Active wing warping control of a joined-wing airplane configuration. In: Proceedings of 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Norfolk, VA, USA, 2003.

22.

Cesnik CES and Su W. Nonlinear aeroelastic modeling and analysis of fully flexible aircraft. In: Proceedings of 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Austin, TX, USA, 2005.

23.

Shearer

Cesnik

CES

. Nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft. J Aircraft 2007; 44: 1528–1545.

24.

Cesnik

CES

. Dynamic response of highly flexible flying wings. AIAA J 2011; 49: 324–339.

25.

Wang

Chen

Liu

. Nonlinear-aerodynamic/nonlinear-structure interaction methodology for a high-altitude-long-endurance wing. J Aircraft 2010; 47: 556–566.

26.

Murua

Palacios

Graham

JMR

. Applications of the unsteady vortex-lattice method in aircraft aeroelasticity and flight dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 2012; 55: 46–72.

27.

Simpson

RJS

Palacios

Murua

. Induced-drag calculations in the unsteady vortex lattice method. AIAA J 2013; 51: 1775–1779.

28.

Hesse

Palacios

. Reduced-order aeroelastic models for the dynamics of maneuvering flexible aircraft. AIAA J 2014; 52: 1717–1732.

29.

Cesnik

CES

. Nonlinear aeroelasticity of a very flexible blended-wing-body aircraft. J Aircraft 2010; 47: 1539–1553.

30.

Raghavan

Patil

. Flight dynamics of high-aspect-ratio flying wings: effect of large trim deformation. J Aircraft 2009; 46: 1808–1812.

31.

Cook

Palacios

Goulart

. Robust gust alleviation and stabilization of very flexible aircraft. AIAA J 2013; 51: 330–340.

32.

Simpson RJS and Palacios R. Numerical aspects of nonlinear flexible aircraft flight dynamics modeling. In: Proceedings of 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Boston, MA, USA, 2013.

33.

Dunn

Dugundji

. Nonlinear stall flutter and divergence analysis of cantilevered graphit/epoxy wings. AIAA J 1992; 30: 153–162.

34.

Tang

Dowell

. Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA J 2001; 39.

35.

Tang

Dowell

. Experimental and theoretical study of gust response for high-aspect-ratio wing. AIAA J 2002; 40: 419–429.

36.

Wright

Cooper

. Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads. Aerospace Series, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007.

37.

Kulfan

. Recent extensions and applications of the ‘CST Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method’. Aeronaut J 2010; 14: 157–176.

38.

Katz

Plotkin

. Low-speed aerodynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

39.

Bertin

. Aerodynamics for engineers, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.

40.

Mason WH. Program FRICTION - Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Aerodynamics and Design Software Collection. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA, 2006.

41.

Soares

CAM

. Elementos Finitos em Mecânica dos Sólidos 1982Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

42.

Zienkiewicz

. The finite element method in engineering science, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.

43.

Bathe

. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1982.

44.

Lee

. MSC/NASTRAN nonlinear analysis 1992; vol. I, Santa Ana, CA: The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation.

45.

Ballmann

. Flow modulation and fluid structure interaction at airplane wings. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design. vol. 84. 1st ed, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003.

46.

Hulshoff

. Aeroelasticity course. Course Notes. University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2011.

47.

Bazilevs

Takizawa

Tezduyar

. Computational fluid-structure interaction: Methods and applications, 1st ed. Wiley Series in Computational Mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013.

48.

Hodges

Pierce

. Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, London: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1996.

49.

Patil

Hodges

Cesnik

CES

. Limit-cycle oscillations in high-aspect-ratio wings. J Fluids Struct 2001; 15: 107–132.

50.

de Brederode

. Aerodinâmica Incompressível: Fundamentos, Lisbon, Portugal: IST Press, 2014.

51.

Cone

Jr . The theory of induced lift and minimum induced drag of nonplanar lifting systems, NASA, 1962.