Performance analysis of microelectromechanical thrusters using a direct simulation Monte Carlo solver

Abstract

In the present study, a direct simulation Monte Carlo solver is utilized to simulate the effects of heater plates on the performance parameters of microelectromechanical propulsion devices. The simulation is two dimensional. Proper cell dimensions, number of particles per cell, and grid study are used to guarantee the accuracy of simulations. Three types of microthrusters including cold gas as type 1, a propulsion device with heaters in the walls as type 2, and a microthruster with heater plates inside the domain as type 3 are studied. Type 1 is considered as a reference case and two other types are compared with type 1. It is observed that heater plates inside the microelectromechanical thruster enhance the downstream temperature due to conversion of pressure drop occurred by plates into temperature. In type 3, the specific impulse is enhanced but the thrust force is decreased in comparison with type 1. Heating the walls in type 2 accelerates the flow while there is no considerable pressure reduction. Moreover, all performance parameters are increased in this type. It is also demonstrated that increasing of wall temperature increases thrust and specific impulse and decreases the sensitivity of thruster due to rarefaction effects.

Keywords

Direct simulation Monte Carlo heater performance parameters microthruster sensitivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gad-el-Hak

. MEMS: Introduction and fundamentals, Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis, 2006.

Karniadakis

Beskok

Aluru

. Interdisciplinary applied mathematics, New York: Springer, 2002.

Gad-el-Hak

. MEMS: Applications, Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor & Francis, 2006.

Janson SW, Helvajian H and Hansen WW. Microthrusters for nanosatellites. In: Second international conference on integrated micro nanotechnology for space applications, Pasadena, CA, USA, 1999, pp.1–17.

Mihailovic M, Mathew T and Creemer J. MEMS silicon-based resistojet micro-thruster for attitude control of nano-satellites. In: Solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems conference (TRANSDUCERS), Beijing, China, 2011, pp.262–265.

Platt D. A monopropellant milli-Newton thruster system for attitude control of nanosatellites. In: AIAA/USU conference on small stellites, Utah, USA, 2002, pp.1–6.

Milligan

. Nozzle characteristics in the transition regime between continuum and free molecular flow. AIAA J 1964; 2: 1088–1092.

Rothe

. Electron-beam studies of viscous flow in supersonic nozzles. AIAA J 1971; 9: 804–811.

Rae

. Some numerical results on viscous low-density nozzle flows in the slender-channel approximation. AIAA J 1971; 9: 811–820.

10.

Boyd

Penko

Meissner

et al.

Experimental and numerical investigations of low-density nozzle and plume flows of nitrogen. AIAA J 1992; 30: 2453–2461.

11.

Bayt RL. Analysis, fabrication and testing of a MEMS-based micropropulsion system. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1999.

12.

Jafryt Y and Beukelt JV. Investigation of nozzle and plume expansions of a small helium thruster. In: Rarefied gas dynamics: Space science and engineering, Washington, DC, 1994, pp.136–145.

13.

Ivanov M, Markelov G, Ketsdever A, et al. Numerical study of cold gas micronozzle flows. In: 37th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, 1999.

14.

Alexeenko

Levin

Gimelshein

et al.

Numerical simulation of high-temperature gas flows in a millimeter-scale thruster. Thermophys Heat Transf J 2002; 16: 10–16.

15.

Alexeenko

Fedosov

Gimelshein

et al.

Transient heat transfer and gas flow in a MEMS-based thruster. Microelectromech Syst J 2006; 15: 181–194.

16.

Xie

. Characteristics of micronozzle gas flows. Phys Fluids J 2007; 19: 1–7.

17.

Torre

Kenjeres

Kleijn

et al.

Effects of wavy surface roughness on the performance of micronozzles. J Propul Power 2010; 26: 655–662.

18.

Sun

Z-X

Z-Y

Y-L

et al.

Coupled solid (FVM)–fluid (DSMC) simulation of micro-nozzle with unstructured-grid. J Microfluid Nanofluid 2009; 7: 621–631.

19.

Wang

. Simulations for gas flows in microgeometries using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2004; 25: 975–985.

20.

Bird

. Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows, Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, 1994.

21.

Nance

Hash

Hassan

. Role of boundary conditions in Monte Carlo simulation of microelectromechanical systems. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 1998; 12: 447–449.

22.

Liou

Fang

. Implicit boundary conditions for direct simulation Monte Carlo method in MEMS flow predictions. CMES 2000; 1: 119–128.

23.

Sun

Z-X

Tang

Y-L

et al.

Proper cell dimension and number of particles per cell for DSMC. Comput Fluids 2011; 50: 1–9.

24.

Bird G and Sophisticated D. Notes prepared for a short course at the DSMC07 meeting. Santa Fe, USA, 2007.

25.

Hassan

Esmail

. DSMC simulation of subsonic flows in parallel and series microchannels. J Fluids Eng 2006; 128: 1153–1163.

26.

Yan

Farouk

. Numerical simulation of gas flow and mixing in a microchannel using the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. Microscale Thermophys Eng 2002; 6: 235–251.

27.

Kundu

Sinha

Bhattacharyya

et al.

Nanowire embedded hydrogen peroxide monopropellant MEMS thruster. J Microelectromech Syst 2013; 22: 406–417.

28.

Hitt

Zakrzwski

Thomas

. MEMS-based satellite micropropulsion via catalyzed hydrogen peroxide decomposition. Smart Mater Struct 2001; 10: 1163–1163.

29.

Wu J, Lee W, Lee F, et al. Pressure boundary treatment in internal gas flows at subsonic speed using the DSMC method. In: 22nd international symposium on rarefied gas dynamics, USA, 2001. pp.408–416.

30.

Darbandi

Roohi

. Study of subsonic–supersonic gas flow through micro/nanoscale nozzles using unstructured DSMC solver. Microfluid Nanofluid 2011; 10: 321–335.