Active control of a non-linear landing gear system having oleo pneumatic shock absorber using robust linear quadratic regulator approach

Abstract

This paper deals with the active control of a non-linear active landing gear system equipped with oleo pneumatic shock absorber. Runway induced vibration can cause reduction of pilot’s capability of control the aircraft and results the safety problem before take-off and after landing. Moreover, passenger–crew comfort is adversely affected by vertical vibrations of the fuselage. The active landing gears equipped with oleo pneumatic shock absorber are highly non-linear systems. In this study, uncertain polytopic state space representation is developed by modelling the pneumatic shock absorber dynamics as a mechanical system with non-linear stiffness and damping properties. Then, linear matrix inequalities-based robust linear quadratic regulator controller having pole location constraints is designed, since the classical linear quadratic regulator control design is dealing with linearized state space models without considering the non-linearities and uncertainties. Thereafter, numerical simulation studies are carried out to analyse aircraft response during taxiing. Bump- and random-type runway irregularities are used with various runway class and wide range of longitudinal speed. Simulation results revealed that neglecting the non-linear dynamics associated with oleo pneumatic shock absorber results significant performance degradation. Consequently, it is demonstrated that proposed robust linear quadratic regulator controller has a superior performance in terms of passenger–crew comfort and operational safety when compared to classical linear quadratic regulator.

Keywords

Active landing gear oleo pneumatic shock absorber taxiing performance robust control linear quadratic regulator linear matrix inequalities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mc Gebee JR and Carde HD. Mathematical model of an active control landing gear for load control during impact and roll-out. Technical Note, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA, February 1976.

Freymann R. Actively damped landing gear system. In: AGARD conference, Povoe de Varzim, Portugal, 8–12 October 1990, pp.20–22.

Mikulowski

Jankowski

. Adaptive landing gear: optimum control strategy and potential for improvement. Shock Vib 2009; 16: 175–194.

Gharapurkor AA, Jahrami AF, Bhat BR, et al. Semi active control of an aircraft landing gear system using H _∞ approach. In: International conference on connected vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 2–6 December 2013, pp.679–685.

Zapaterio M, Pozo M, Rossel F, et al. Landing gear suspension control through adaptive backstepping techniques with H _∞ performance. In: 18th IFAC World congress, Milano, Italy, 29 August–2 September 2011, pp.4809–4814.

Currey

. Aircraft landing gear design: principles and practice, 1st ed. Washington DC: AIAA Education Series, 1998, pp. 1–1.

Wang

Xing

Price

et al.

An investigation of an active landing gear system to reduce aircraft vibrations caused by landing impacts and runway excitations. J Sound Vib 2008; 317: 50–66.

Ross I and Edson R. Application of active control technology to the A-10 aircraft. Technical Note, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, USA, July 1983.

Sivakumar

Haran

. Mathematical model and vibration analysis of aircraft with active landing gears. J Vib Control 2015; 21: 229–245.

10.

Yazici

Sever

. Observer based optimal vibration control of a full aircraft system having active landing gears and biodynamic pilot model. Shock Vib 2016; 2016: 1–20.

11.

Toloei

Zarchi

Attaran

. Application of active suspension system to reduce aircraft vibration using PID technique and bees algorithm. Int J Comput Appl 2014; 98: 17–24.

12.

Liu

. GA based model predictive control of semi active landing gear. Chin J Aeronaut 2007; 20: 47–54.

13.

Sun

Jia

Xiong

et al.

Aircraft landing gear control with multi-objective optimization using generalized cell mapping. Trans Tianjin Univ 2015; 21: 140–146.

14.

Jatskevich

Dumont

et al.

An advanced LMI-based-LQR design for voltage control of grid-connected wind farm. Electr Power Syst Res 2008; 78: 539–546.

15.

Olalla

Leyva

El Aroudi

et al.

Robust LQR control for PWM converters: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2009; 56: 2548–2558.

16.

Elmi

Ohadi

Samadi

. Active front-steering control of a sport utility vehicle using a robust linear quadratic regulator method, with emphasis on the roll dynamics. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering 2013; 227: 1636–1649.

17.

Sever M, Kaya EE, Arslan MS, et al. Active trailer braking system design with linear matrix inequalities based multi-objective robust LQR controller for vehicle-trailer systems. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Gothenburg, Sweden, 19–22 June 2016, pp.726–731.

18.

Sever M and Yazici H. Nonlinear vibration analysis of oleo pneumatic landing gear system integrated with biodynamic pilot model. In: 2nd international conference on advances in mechanical engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 10–13 May 2016, pp.782–787.

19.

Meng

Liu

et al.

Mixed H _∞ /H₂ gain-scheduled control for spacecraft rendezvous in elliptical orbits. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2012; 228: 236–247.

20.

Agrawal

Gao

. Robust H _∞ control of Theodorsen’s lift model for a pitching and plunging airfoil using linear matrix inequality approach. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 229: 851–866.

21.

Yin

. Tensor product model-based control of morphing aircraft in transition process. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2016; 230: 378–391.

22.

Boyd

El Gahoui

Feron

et al.

Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory, Philadelphia: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1994, pp. 115–115.

23.

Chilali

Gahinet

. H _∞ design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1996; 41: 358–367.

24.

Arzelier

Bernussou

Garcia

. Pole assignment of linear uncertain systems in a sector via a Lypaunov-type approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1993; 38: 1128–1132.

25.

Giua

Melas

Seatzu

et al.

Design of predictive suspension system. Veh Syst Dyn 2004; 329: 277–300.

26.

Sivakumar

Haran

. Aircraft random vibration analysis using active landing gears. J Low Freq Noise Vib 2015; 34: 307–322.

27.

Löfberg J. YALMIP: a toolbox for modelling and optimization in MATLAB. In: IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control System Design (CACSD), Taipei, Taiwan, 2–4 September 2004, pp.284–289.

28.

Strum

. Using SeDuMi 1.02, A MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim Method Soft 1999; 11: 625–653.

29.

Lin

. Robust control design: an optimal control approach, Berlin: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.

30.

Sun

Gao

Kaynak

. Finite frequency H _∞ control for vehicle active suspension systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2011; 19: 416–422.

31.

ISO2631-1: 1997. Mechanical vibrations and shock – Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration part 1: general requirements, International Standardization Organization.