Thrust control strategy based on the minimum combustor inlet Mach number to enhance the overall performance of a scramjet engine

Abstract

A lower combustor inlet Mach number is desirable in order to design a compact, lightweight combustor and boost the overall performance of the scramjet engine. In this study, a thrust control strategy is proposed for a hydrogen-fueled scramjet taking into account the operating limitations, which is called the minimum combustor inlet Mach number rule since the combustor inlet Mach number is used as the control variable. By scheduling the fuel supply and modifying the intake geometry, the combustor inlet Mach number can be minimized while ensuring a certain thrust output within the operation constraints. In this manner, the scramjet engine can be operated with high specific thrust and low fuel consumption throughout the flight envelope. The thrust control strategy is further applied to a hydrogen-fueled scramjet in the hypersonic flight regime. Because the combustor inlet Mach number varies with flight conditions, the thrust strategy can be applied in practice by monitoring the following aerothermodynamic parameters in different flight regimes instead: (1) combustor outlet Mach number, (2) combustor inlet static temperature, and (3) combustor outlet static temperature. Furthermore, the effects of the thrust output on the division of flight regime are investigated, and the overall performance of the hydrogen-fueled scramjet engine obtained from applying the thrust control strategy is discussed in detail.

Keywords

Scramjet engine thrust control strategy combustor inlet Mach number overall performance hydrogen fuel

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Segal

. The scramjet engine: processes and characteristics, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 73, 88, 135–73, 88, 135.

Wei B, Ling W, Luo F, et al. Propulsion performance research and status of TRRE engine experiment. In: 21st AIAA international space planes and hypersonics technologies conference, international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conferences, Xiamen, China, 6–9 March 2017, paper no. AIAA 2017–2351.

Musielak

Saracoglu

. Busy year of scramjet research. Aerosp Am 2015; 53: 53–53.

Heiser W and Pratt D. Hypersonic airbreathing propulsion. AIAA Education Series. Reston, VA: AIAA, 1994, p.80, 233.

Tetlow

Doolan

. Comparison of hydrogen and hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet engines for orbital insertion. J Spacecraft Rockets 2007; 44: 365–373.

Micka

Driscoll

. Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder. Proc Combust Inst 2009; 32: 2397–2404.

Wang

Sun

. Review of cavity-stabilized combustion for scramjet applications. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2014; 228: 2718–2735.

Kummitha

Suneetha

Pandey

. Numerical analysis of scramjet combustor with innovative strut and fuel injection techniques. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017; 42: 10524–10535.

Ren

Wang

Xie

, et al. Thermal auto-ignition in high-speed droplet-laden mixing layers. Fuel 2017; 191: 176–189.

10.

Huang

Yang

Lai

, et al. Simulation of axisymmetric scramjet inlet flow fields using anti-diffusive WENO Navier-Stokes solver. J Mech Sci Technol 2015; 29: 1875–1882.

11.

Kamali

Mousavi

Binesh

. Three dimensional CFD investigation of shock train structure in a supersonic nozzle. Acta Astronaut 2015; 116: 56–67.

12.

Jackson

Gruber

Buccellato

. Mach 6–8+ hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet flight experiment: the HIFiRE flight 2 project. J Propul Power 2015; 31: 36–53.

13.

Liu

Baccarella

Lee

, et al. Influences of inlet geometry modification on scramjet flow and combustion dynamics. J Propul Power 2017; 33: 1179–1186.

14.

Zhang

Liang

Sun

, et al. Experimental investigation of combustion stabilization modes in a cavity-based supersonic combustor with different wall divergence angles. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering. 2018; 232: 1853–1863.

15.

Steva

Goyne

Rockwell

, et al. Comparison of a direct-connect and freejet dual-mode Scramjet. J Propul Power 2015; 38: 1380–1392.

16.

Doherty

Smart

Mee

. Experimental testing of an airframe-integrated three-dimensional scramjet at Mach 10. AIAA J 2015; 53: 3196–3207.

17.

Zhang

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Thermodynamic analysis on optimum performance of scramjet engine at high Mach numbers. Energy 2015; 90: 1046–1054.

18.

Cao

Chang

Tang

, et al. Study on combustion mode transition of hydrogen fueled dual-mode scramjet engine based on thermodynamic cycle analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014; 39: 21251–21258.

19.

Roux

Tiruveedula

. Constant velocity combustion parametric ideal scramjet cycle analysis. J Thermophys Heat Transf 2016; 30: 697–703.

20.

Curran

. Scramjet engines: the first forty years. J Propul Power 2001; 17: 1138–1148.

21.

Cui

Bao

. An idea of distributed parameter control for scramjet engines. Aeronaut J 2007; 111: 787–796.

22.

Cui

Bao

. Distributed parameter control arithmetic for an axisymmetrical dual-mode scramjet. Aeronaut J 2008; 112: 557–565.

23.

Baccarella

Mcgann

, et al. Unstart phenomena induced by mass addition and heat release in a model scramjet. J Fluid Mech 2016; 797: 604–629.

24.

Smart

. Scramjets. Aeronaut J 2007; 111: 605–619.

25.

Chen

Wei

, et al. Numerical simulations of turbulent flows in aeroramp injector/gas-pilot flame scramjet. Chinese J Aeronuat 2017; 30: 1373–1390.

26.

Tian

Yang

, et al. Investigation of the effects of fuel injector locations on ignition and flame stabilization in a kerosene fueled scramjet combustor. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017; 70: 310–316.

27.

Moss J and Perrell E. Design and preliminary analysis of variable geometry SCRAM Jet / Rocket. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 11–14 July 2004, paper no. AIAA 2004-3652.

28.

Colket

Spadaccini

. Scramjet fuels autoignition study. J Propul Power 2001; 17: 315–323.

29.

Ji Z, Wang B and Zhang H. Steady state characteristics of scramjet engines using hydrogen for high Mach numbers. In: 21st AIAA international space planes and hypersonics technologies conference, international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conferences, Xiamen, China, 6–9 March 2017, paper no. AIAA 2017-2294.

30.

Farokhi

. Aircraft propulsion, 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009, pp. 113–119.

31.

McBride BJ, Zehe MJ and Gordon S. NASA Glenn coefficients for calculating thermodynamic properties of individual species. NASA Technical, Report TP-2002-211556, 2002.