The present investigation addresses two key issues in aerodynamic performance of a propeller–wing configuration, namely linear and nonlinear predictions with low-order numerical models. The developed aerodynamic model is targeted to be used in the preliminary aircraft design loop. First, the combination of selected propeller model, i.e. blade element theory with the wing model, i.e. lifting line theory and vortex lattice method is considered for linear aerodynamic model. Second, for the nonlinear prediction, a modified vortex lattice method is paired with the two-dimensional viscous effect of the airfoils to simplify and reduce the computational time. These models are implemented and validated with existing experimental data to predict the differences in lift and drag distribution. Overall, the predicted results show agreement with low percentage of error compared with the experimental data for various thrust coefficients and produced induced drag distribution that behaves as expected.
Ameyugo G, Taylor M and Singh R. Distributed propulsion feasibility studies. In: The 25th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, 2006.
2.
Stoll AM, Bevirt J, Moore MD, et al. Drag reduction through distributed electric propulsion. In: The 14th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference, June 2014, pp.1–10. DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-2851.
3.
Stoll AM. Comparison of CFD and experimental results of the LEAPTech distributed electric propulsion blown wing. In: The 15th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference, June 2015, pp.22–26. DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-3188.
4.
Borer NK, Derlaga JM, Deere KA, et al. Comparison of aero-propulsive performance predictions for distributed propulsion configurations. In: The 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2017, pp.1–16. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-0209.
5.
Antcliff KR and Capristan FM. Conceptual design of the parallel electric-gas architecture with synergistic utilization scheme (PEGASUS) concept. In: 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Denver, Colorado, June 2017, pp.1–15. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-4001.
6.
GavriloviNNRasuoBDulikravchGS, et al.Commercial aircraft performance improvement using winglets. FME Trans2015; 43: 1–8.
7.
StojakovicPRasuoB. Single propeller airplane minimal flight speed based upon the lateral maneuver condition. Aerosp Sci Technol2016; 49: 239–249.
8.
StojakovicPVelimirovicKRasuoB. Power optimization of a single propeller airplane take-off run on the basis of lateral maneuver limitations. Aerosp Sci Technol2017; 1: 1–11.
9.
LambeABMartinsJRRA. Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes. Struct Multidiscip Optim2012; 46: 273–284.
10.
Schmollgruber P, Bedouet J, Sgueglia A, et al. Use of certification constraints module for aircraft design activities. In: AIAA aviation forum. AIAA 2017-3762.
11.
Bohari B, Borlon Q, Mendoza-Santos PB, et al. Conceptual design of distributed propellers aircraft: non-linear aerodynamic model verification of propeller-wing interaction in high-lifting configuration. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Epub ahead of print 7 January 2018. DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1742.
12.
Witkowski D, Lee A and Sullivan J. Aerodynamic interaction between propellers and wings. In: The 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1988, 26(9): 829–836. DOI: 10.2514/3.45848.
13.
Hunsaker D and Snyder D. A lifting-line approach to estimating propeller/wing interactions. In: AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2006, 26(3466). DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-3466.
14.
JardinTGrondinGGressierJ, et al.Revisiting Froude's theory for hovering shrouded rotor. AIAA J2015, pp. 53(7): 1836–1844. DOI: 10.2514/1.J053507.
15.
ChattotJ-J. Actuator disk theory steady and unsteady models. J Solar Energy Eng2014; 136: 031012. DOI: 10.1115/1.4026947.
16.
Prandtl L. Mutual influence of wings and propeller. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1921. DOI: NACA-TN-74.
17.
PhillipsWFSnyderDO. Modern adaptation of Prandtl's classic lifting-line theory. J Aircraft2000; 37: 662–670.
18.
VeldhuisLLMHeymaPM. Aerodynamic optimisation of wings in multi-engined tractor propeller arrangements. Aircraft Des2000; 3: 129–149.
19.
Campbell GS. A finite-step method for the calculation of span loadings of unusual plan forms. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1951. DOI: NACA-RM-L50L13.
20.
Blackwell JA. A finite-step method for calculation of theoretical load distributions for arbitrary lifting-surface arrangements at subsonic speeds. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1969. DOI: NASA-TN-D-5335.
21.
Katz J and Plotkin A. Low-speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Cambridge Aerospace Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
22.
Bohari B, Bronz M, Benard E, et al. Conceptual design of distributed propellers aircraft: linear aerodynamic model verification of propeller-wing interaction. In: European conference for aeronautics and aerospace sciences (EUCASS), 2017.
23.
WeibergJARoyNFrigginJ, et al.Large scale wind-tunnel tests of an airplane model with an unswept, aspect-ratio 10 wing, two propellers and area-suction flaps. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1958. DOI: NACA-TN-4365. .
24.
Van DamCPVander KamJCParisJK. Design-oriented high-lift methodology for general aviation and civil transport aircraft. J Aircraft2001, pp. 38(6): 1076–1084. DOI: 10.2514/2.2875 .
25.
TsengJLanC. Calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of air-plane configurations at high angles of attack. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1988. DOI: NASA-CR-4182. .
26.
SivellsJCWestrickGC. Method for calculating lift distributions for unswept wings with flaps or ailerons by use of non linear section lift data. Technical report, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Laboratory, Langley Field, VA, 1951. DOI: NACA-TR-1090. .
27.
Gallay S. Algorithme de couplage RANS et écoulement potentiel. Master's Thesis, Université de Montréal – Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada, 2016.
28.
Page VR, Dickinson SO and Deckert WH. Large-scale wind-tunnel tests of a deflected slipstream STOL model with wings of various aspect ratios. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 1968.
