Control of a small helicopter with linear matrix inequality-based design assuring stability and performance

Abstract

This article focuses on linear matrix inequality-based controller designs that can achieve stabilization and reference tracking for a small unmanned helicopter at various flight conditions. A nonlinear mathematical model of a small-scale helicopter is constructed. Then trim conditions are found and linearized around different equilibrium points. Local $H_{\infty}$ controllers are designed at trim conditions based on the local linear models. The pointwise controllers achieve local stability and performance, but fail at stabilization and tracking over the full envelope. A scheduling controller is built by blending the local controller outputs. In addition, grid-based $H_{\infty}$ controllers are designed at each operating point with common Lyapunov function. This allows controller scheduling between the adjacent design points with guaranteed stability and performance across the design envelope. Based on the family of linear systems which are obtained from the nonlinear model, an affine parameter-dependent model is built to exploit the approximate linear parameter dependency. Then, a parameter-dependent linear parameter varying controller is synthesized for the affine parameter-dependent model. Although local performance is satisfactory for all given design methods, local $H_{\infty}$ controllers and affine parameter-dependent controller cannot yield satisfactory performance over the full flight envelope apart from the grid-based controller with common Lyapunov function approach.

Keywords

Control design performance scheduling small helicopter stability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Postlethwaite

Prempain

Turkoglu

, et al. Design and flight testing of various H∞ controllers for the Bell 205 helicopter. Control Eng Pract 2005; 13: 383–398.

Prempain

Postlethwaite

. Static H ∞ loop shaping control of a fly-by-wire helicopter. Automatica 2005; 41: 1517–1528.

Luo

Liu

Yang

, et al. Helicopter H∞ control design with robust flying quality. Aerospace Sci Technol 2003, pp. 159–169.

La Civita

Papageorgiou

Messner

, et al. Design and flight testing of an H∞ controller for a robotic helicopter. J Guidance Control Dyn 2006; 29: 485–494.

Shamma

Cloutiert

. Gain-scheduled missile autopilot design using linear parameter varying transformations. J Guidance Control Dyn 1993; 16: 256–263.

Apkarian

Gahinet

Biannic

. Gain-scheduled H∞ control of missile via linear matrix inequalities. J Guidance Control Dyn 1994, pp. 28–28.

Guo

Yao

Zhang

. Robust gain scheduled longitudinal autopilot design for rockets during the sustaining phase. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2016; 230: 1154–1163.

Theodoulis

Sève

Wernert

. Robust gain-scheduled autopilot design for spin-stabilized projectiles with a course-correction fuze. Aerospace Sci Technol 2015; 42: 477–489.

Chen

Chang

, et al. Robust gain-scheduled control for vertical/short take-off and landing aircraft in hovering with time-varying mass and moment of inertia. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222: 473–482.

10.

Balas GJ, Mueller JB and Barker J. Application of gain-scheduled multivariable control techniques to the F/A-18 system research aircraft. AIAA-99-4206, 1999.

11.

Lhachemi

Saussié

Zhu

. A structured H∞-based optimization approach for integrated plant and self-scheduled flight control system design. Aerospace Sci Technol 2015; 45: 30–38.

12.

Aouf

Boulet

. Linear fractional transformation gain-scheduling flight control preserving robust performance. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2011; 226: 763–773.

13.

Cai

Song

Chen

. Flight control system design for hypersonic reentry vehicle based on LFT–LPV method. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2014; 228: 1130–1140.

14.

Postlethwaite

Konstantopoulos

Sun

X-D

, et al. Design, flight simulation, and handling qualities evaluation of an LPV gain-scheduled helicopter flight control system. Eur J Control 2000; 6: 553–566.

15.

Walker

. Gain-scheduled flight control via two-degree-of-freedom H∞ optimization. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 1997; 211: 263–268.

16.

Prempain

Postlethwaite

. A new two-degree-of-freedom gain scheduling method applied to the Lynx MK7. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2000; 214: 299–311.

17.

Turner

Aouf

Bates

, et al. Switched control of a vertical/short take-off land aircraft: an application of linear quadratic bumpless transfer. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2006; 220: 157–170.

18.

Sahin IH and Kasnakoglu C. An affine parameter dependent controller for an autonomous helicopter at different flight conditions. In: Advanced control and navigation for autonomous aeroespace vehicles, Seville, Spain, 2015.

19.

Jafar

Bhatti

Ahmad

, et al. Robust gain-scheduled linear parameter-varying control algorithm for a lab helicopter: a linear matrix inequality–based approach. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering 2018; 232: 558–571.

20.

Sahin

Kasnakoglu

. A stability guarenteed smooth-scheduled MIMO robust emergency autopilot for a laterel surface jammed UAV. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2017, pp. 1–14.

21.

Gahinet

Apkarian

. A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 1994; 4: 421–448.

22.

Apkarian

Gahinet

. A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1995; 40: 853–864.

23.

Apkarian

Gahinet

Becker

. Self-scheduled H_∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example. Automatica 1995; 31: 1251–1261.

24.

Chilali

Gahinet

. Hinf design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1996; 41: 358–368.

25.

Löfberg J. YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the CACSD conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 2–4 September 2004.

26.

Sturm

. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim Methods Software 1999; V.11: 625–653.

27.

Scherer CW and Weiland S. Linear matrix inequalities in control, DISC. Lecture notes, 1999.

28.

Gavrilets V, Mettler B and Feron E. Dynamic model for a miniature aerobatic helicopter. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit, Montreal, Canada, 2001.

29.

Heffley

Mnich

. Minimum-complexity helicopter simulation math model, Los Altos, CA: Manudyne Systems, Inc., 1988.

30.

Padfield

. Helicopter flight dynamics: the theory and application of flying qualities and simulation modelling, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

31.

Gavrilets V, Mettler B and Feron E. Nonlinear model for a small-size acrobatic helicopter. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Montreal, Canada, 6–9 August 2001.

32.

Caigny JD, Camino JF, Olivera RCLF, et al. Modelling and control of LPV systems: a vibroacoustic application. In: Control of linear parameter varying systems with applications. Berlin: Springer, 2012, pp.357–379.

33.

Bates

Postlethwaite

. Robust multivariable control of aerospace systems, Delft: Delft University Press, 2002.

34.

Lusardi JA, Blanken CL and Tischler MB. Piloted evaluation of a UH-60 mixer equivalent turbulence simulation model. American Helicopter Society, Arizona, 2004.

35.

Lusardi

Tischler

Blanken

, et al. Empirically derived helicopter response model and control system requirements for flight in turbulence. Am Helicopter Soc 2004, pp. 340–349.