Geometrically exact vortex lattice method and panel method are presented in this paper to deal with aerodynamic load computation for geometrically nonlinear static aeroelastic problems. They are combined with geometrically nonlinear finite element method through surface spline interpolation in the loosely-coupled iteration. From the perspective of theoretical research, both vortex lattice method and panel method are based on the full potential equation and able to model the deflection and twist of the wing, while vortex lattice method is based on the thin airfoil theory, and panel method is suitable for thick wings. Although the potential flow equation is linear, the introduction of geometrically exact boundary conditions makes it significantly different from the linear aeroelastic analysis. The numerical results of a high aspect ratio wing are provided to declare the influence of large deformation on nonlinear static aeroelastic computation compared with linear analysis. Aeroelastic analyses based on geometrically exact vortex lattice method and panel method are also compared with the results of computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics coupling method and the wind tunnel test data. The nonlinear static aeroelastic analysis agrees with the measurement even in considerably large deformation situations.
PatilMJHodgesDH. On the importance of aerodynamic and structural geometrical nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-ratio wings. J Fluids Struct2004; 19: 905–915.
2.
Noll ET, Ishmael SD and Henwood B, et al. Technical findings, lessons learned, and recommendations resulting from the helios prototype vehicle mishap. In: NATO/RTO AVT-145 workshop on design concepts, processes and criteria for UAV Structural Integrity, National Astronautics and Space Administration, Florence, Italy, 15–16 April 2007.
3.
FriedmannPP. Renaissance of aeroelasticity and its future. J Aircraft1999; 36: 105–121.
4.
LivneE. Future of airplane aeroelasticity. J Aircraft2003; 44: 1066–1092.
5.
AfonsoaFValeaJOliveiraaÉ, et al.A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings. Progr Aerosp Sci2017; 89: 40–57.
6.
CesnikCESSenatorePJSuW, et al.X-HALE: a very flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for nonlinear aeroelastic tests. AIAA J2012; 50: 2820–2833.
7.
Cesnik CES and Su W. Nonlinear aeroelastic modeling and analysis of fully flexible aircraft. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 18–21 April 2005.
8.
ShearerCMCesnikCES. Nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft. J Aircraft2007; 44: 1528–1545.
PalaciosRMuruaJCookR. Structural and aerodynamic models in nonlinear flight dynamics of very flexible aircraft. AIAA J2010; 48: 2648–2659.
11.
CastellaniMCooperJELemmensY. Nonlinear static aeroelasticity of high-aspect-ratio-wing aircraft by finite element and multibody methods. J Aircraft2017; 54: 548–560.
12.
Howcroft C, Cook R and Calderon D, et al. Aeroelastic modelling of highly flexible wings. In: AIAA SciTech, 15th dynamics specialists conference, San Diego, California, USA, 4–8 January 2016.
13.
XieCWangLYangC, et al.Static aeroelastic analysis of very flexible wings based on the non-planar vortex lattice method. Chin J Aeronaut2013; 26: 514–521.
14.
XieCAnCLiuY, et al.Static aeroelastic analysis including geometric nonlinearities based on reduced order model. Chin J Aeronaut2017; 30: 638–650.
15.
LiuYXieCYangC, et al.Gust response analysis and wind tunnel test for a high-aspect ratio wing. Chin J Aeronaut2015; 29: 91–103.
16.
XieCLiuYYangC, et al.Geometrically nonlinear aeroelastic stability analysis and wind tunnel test validation of a very flexible wing. Shock Vibr 2016; 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5090719.
17.
ChangchuanXLanYYiL, et al.Stability of very flexible aircraft with coupled nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics. J Aircraft2018; 55: 862–874.
18.
Timothy JA, Sexton BW and Scott MJ. SUGAR Truss braced wing full scale aeroelastic analysis and dynamically scaled wind tunnel model development. In: 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, Florida, 5–9 January 2015.
19.
Palacios R and Cesnik CES. Low-speed aeroelastic modeling of very flexible slender wings with deformable airfoils. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Schaumburg, IL, 7–10 April 2008.
20.
AlbanoERoddenWP. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. AIAA J1969; 7: 279–285.
21.
Ritter M, Teixeira PC and Cesnik CES. Comparison of nonlinear aeroelastic methods for maneuver simulation of very flexible aircraft. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, Florida, 8–12 January 2018.
22.
MuruaJPalaciosRGrahamJMR. Applications of the unsteady vortex-lattice method in aircraft aeroelasticity and flight dynamics. Progr Aerosp Sci2012; 55: 46–72.
WuMGarcia-FogedaPLiuDD. Potential flow over bodies of revolution in unsteady motion. AIAA J1989; 27: 725–733.
25.
ChenPCLeeHWLiuDD. Unsteady subsonic aerodynamics for bodies and wings with external stores including wake effect. J Aircraft1993; 30: 618–628.
26.
ZAERO theoretical manual. Version 8.2 ed. Scottsdale: ZONA Technology, 2008.
27.
Palacios R and Cesnik CES. Static nonlinear aeroelasticity of flexible slender wings in compressible flow. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 18–21 April 2005.
28.
Hallissy BP and Cesnik CES. High-fidelity aeroelastic analysis of very flexible aircraft. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Denver, Colorado, 4–7 April 2011.
29.
AndersonJD. Computational fluid dynamics: the basics with applications, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe, 1995.
30.
Johnson EH and Rodden WP. Aeroelastic analysis user’s guide. Version 68 ed. California: The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation Publication, 1994.
31.
KatzJPlotkinA. Low-speed aerodynamics – from wing theory to panel methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 400–404.
32.
MaskewB. Program VSAERO theory document: a computer program for calculating nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics of arbitrary configurations. NASA Contractor Report 1987. NASA-CR-4023, NAS 1.26:4023, AMI-8416. Washington, DC: NASA.
33.
HessJLSmithAMO. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary bodies. Progr Aerosp Sci1967; 8: 1–138.
34.
HessJL. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies. Final Technical Report. McDonnell Douglas Report No. MOC J5679-01, October 1972.
35.
XieCYangC. Surface splines generalization and large deflection interpolation. J Aircraft2007; 44: 1024–1026.
