Yaw control of a flying-wing unmanned aerial vehicle based on reverse jet control

Abstract

Due to its layout, there are difficulties in realizing heading attitude control of a flying-wing unmanned aerial vehicle. In this paper, a reverse jet control scheme has been designed: (1) to replace the resistance rudders that are used for the yaw control of a conventional flying-wing unmanned aerial vehicle, (2) to assist and optimize heading attitude control, eliminate the adverse effects of the control surface and enhance stealth performance, and (3) to promote the use of rudderless flight for flying-wing unmanned aerial vehicles. To explore the control mechanism and the flow field of the reverse jet scheme, three-dimensional numerical simulations and low-speed wind tunnel experiments were carried out. First, the numerical simulations evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of the reverse jet control scheme and explored and optimized the excitation parameters for the scheme. Then the forces were measured in a wind tunnel, and particle image velocimetry experiments were carried out. A reverse jet actuator was independently designed to verify the results of the numerical simulation. The results show that when the reverse jet excitation is applied, the jet obstructs the mainstream, destroys the flow field at the excitation position, and causes early separation of the flow, which increases the pressure drag on the wings and produces a control effect. The control effect mainly depends on the separation degree of the leeward surface. The larger the jet momentum coefficient is, the smaller the jet angle is, and the closer the excitation position is to the leading edge, the greater the separation degree of the leeward surface is, the better the heading attitude control effect is.

Keywords

Reverse jet control yaw control numerical simulation wind tunnel experiment flow separation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Qin, N. Aerodynamic studies for blended wing body aircraft. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Altanta, GA, 4-6 September 2002, p.5448. DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-5448.

Paul

Mahmood

. Blended wing body lateral-directional stability investigation using 6dof simulation. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2013; 228: 7–19.

Colgren R and Loschke R. To tail or two tails? the effective design and modeling of yaw control devices. In: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, 5-8 August 2002, vol. 105, pp.8223–8230. DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-4609.

. Control characteristics analysis of drag yawing control devices of flying wing configuration. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 2014; 40: 695–700.

Bowlus JA, Multhopp D and Banda SS. Challenges and opportunities in tailless aircraft stability and control. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 11-13 August 1997. DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-3830.

Zhang

Jun

Tian

, et al. Experimental investigation of split-rudder deflection on aerodynamic performance of tailless flying-wing aircraft. J Exp Fluid Mech 2010; 24: 63–66.

Simon J, Blake W and Multhopp D. Control concepts for a vertical tailless fighter. In: Aircraft design, systems, and operations meeting, 2013, vol. 110, pp.1475–1475.

Gillard W, Dorsett K, Gillard W, et al. Directional control for tailless aircraft using all moving wing tips. In: Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 2006.

Dorsett KM and Mehl DR. Innovative control effectors (ice). Constr Contr Alloc, WL-TR-96-3043,1996.

10.

Whittenbury

. Configuration design development of the navy ucas-d x-47b. B World Health Organ 2015; 87: 824–832.

11.

Goldthorpe S, Rossitto K, Hyde D, et al. X-48B blended wing body flight test performance of maximum sideslip and high to post stall angle-of-attack command tracking. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, 2013.

12.

Zhan

Cheng

Zhao

. Active flow control technique. Aeronaut Sci Technol 2010(5), pp. 2–6.

13.

Johnson

Chowdhary

Chandramohan

, et al. UAV flight control using flow control actuators. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, OR, 8-11 August 2011. DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-6450.

14.

Woods P and FLAVIIR. FLAVIIR – an integrated programme of research for UAV's. In: 3rd AIAA flow control conference (AIAA), 2000.

15.

Fielding

Mills

Smith

. Design and manufacture of the demon unmanned air vehicle demonstrator vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2010; 224: 365–372.

16.

Kay A. Successful first flight trial completion of unmanned aerial vehicle, MAGMA[DB/OL]. 2017, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/first-magma-flight-trials (accessed 13 December 2017).

17.

Kay A. Successful demonstration of breakthrough blown-air flight technologies to revolutionise future aircraft design [DB/OL]. 2019, https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/magma-the-future-of-flight (accessed 13 December 2017).

18.

Milholen WE, Jones GS, Chan DT, et al. Enhancements to the FAST-MAC circulation control model and recent high-reynolds number testing in the national transonic facility. In: AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, 2013.

19.

Jones GS, Milholen WE, Chan DT, et al. Development of the circulation control flow scheme used in the NTF semi-span FAST-MAC model. In: AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, 2013.

20.

Shmilovich A, Yadlin Y, Dickey ED, et al. Development of an active flow control technique for an airplane high-lift configuration. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2017.

21.

Zhou

. Study on longitudinal stability improvement of flying wing aircraft based on synthetic jet flow control. Aerosp Sci Technol 2015; 46: S1270963815002369.

22.

Seifert

David

Fono

, et al. Roll control via active flow control: from concept to flight. J Aircr 2010; 47: 864–874.

23.

Hoholis

Steijl

Badcock

. Circulation control as a roll effector for unmanned combat aerial vehicles. J Aircr 2016; 53: 1–16.

24.

Williams DR and Seidel J. Crossed-actuation AFC for lateral-directional control of an ICE-101/Saccon UCAV. In: AIAA flow control conference, 2016.

25.

David

Seifert

. On the generation of yawing moment using active flow control. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2012; 38: 72–81.

26.

Zhao

Qin

. An investigation on controlling lateral characteristics for a flying wing configuration. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica 2008; 26: 234–238.

27.

Shi

Zhu

Dai

, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics and flight testing of a UAV without control surfaces based on circulation control. J Aerosp Eng 2019, pp. 32(1).