Conceptual design and analysis of an affordable truss-braced wing regional jet aircraft

Abstract

A regional, turbofan-powered, 72-passenger, transport aircraft with very high aspect ratio truss-braced wings is developed with an affordable methodology from an existing 52 passenger, conventional twin-turboprop aircraft. At first, the ration behind the selection of the truss-braced wing configuration is discussed. Next, the methodologies for the sizing, weight, aerodynamics, performance, and cost analysis are presented and validated against existing regional aircraft. The variant configurations and their design features are then discussed. Finally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the effects of the wing aspect ratio and engine bypass ratio on the aircraft weight, aerodynamics, and cost. It has been found that the penalties associated with the wing weight will prevent the acceptable realization of the high aspect ratio wing benefits, but when it is combined with the very high bypass ratio engines, a 17% reduction in the mission fuel weight is achieved. In contrast, the cost analysis has revealed that the application of higher aspect ratio wings in the truss-braced wing configuration may increase the development and maintenance costs. Consequently, with aspect ratios higher than 24, eventually, these costs may outperform the associated fuel cost reductions.

Keywords

Aircraft truss-braced wing regional jet conceptual design very high bypass ratio engine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Aeronautics: a vision for 2020. European Commission, 2001.

Flightpath 2050, Europ’s vision for aviation. European Commission, 2011.

Liebeck RH, Page MA and Rawdon BK. Blended-wing-body subsonic commercial transport. In: 36th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 1998, AIAA 1998-0438. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Mantič-Lugo

Doulgeris

Singh

. Computational analysis of the effects of a boundary layer ingesting propulsion system in transonic flow. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2013; 227: 1215–1232.

Bijewitz

Seitz

Isikveren

, et al. Multi-disciplinary design investigation of propulsive fuselage aircraft concepts. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2016; 88: 257–267.

Liu

Doulgeris

Laskaridis

, et al. Thermal cycle analysis of turboelectric distributed propulsion system with boundary layer ingestion. Aerosp Sci Technol 2013; 27: 163–170.

Meadows

Schetz

Kapania

, et al. Multidisciplinary design optimization of medium-range transonic truss-braced wing transport aircraft. J Aircraft 2012; 49: 1844–1856.

Airbus, Rolls-Royce, and Siemens team up for electric future Partnership launches E-Fan X hybrid-electric flight demonstrator, Airbus, www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2017/11/airbus–rolls-royce–and-siemens-team-up-for-electric-future-par.html (accessed 3 March 2017).

Antcliff KR and Capristan FM. Conceptual design of the parallel electric-gas architecture with synergistic utilization scheme (PEGASUS) concept. In: 18th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, June 2017, pp.1–15, AIAA 2017-4001.

10.

Droney CK, Harrison NA and Gatlin GM. Subsonic ultra-green aircraft research: transonic truss-braced wing technical maturation. In: 31st congress of the international council of the aeronautical sciences, ICAS 2018, 2018, ICAS 2018-0597.

11.

Reist TA and Zingg DW. Optimization of the aerodynamic performance of regional and wide-body-class blended wing-body aircraft. In: 33rd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, June 2015, AIAA 2015-3292.

12.

Market forecast, 2017-2036. Bombardier, 2017.

13.

Park

. Fuel consumption of a strutted vs cantilever-winged short-haul transport with aeroelastic considerations. J Aircraft 1980; 17: 856–860.

14.

Johanning A and Scholz D. Investigation of a novel turboprop-driven aircraft concept including future technologies. In: Innovative design and development practices in aerospace and automotive engineering: I-DAD, Chennai, India, 22–24 February 2016, pp.589–603.

15.

Hosseini S, Vaziri-Zanjani MA and Ovesy HR. Conceptual assessment of the truss-braced wing and advanced novel passenger aircraft configurations. In: 18th international conference of Iranian aerospace society, Tehran, Iran, 4-6 Febraury 2020.

16.

Seitz

Bijewitz

Kaiser

, et al. Conceptual investigation of a propulsive fuselage aircraft layout. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2014; 86: 464–472.

17.

Plas AP, et al. Performance of a boundary layer ingesting (BLI) propulsion system. In: 45th American institute of aeronautics and astronautics aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, 2007, AIAA 2007-450. Reston, VA: AIAA.

18.

Lucas JR, Brien WFO and Ferrar AM. Effect of BLI–type inlet distortion on turbofan engine performance. In: ASME 2014 turbine expo, 2014, pp.1–18. New York: ASME.

19.

Velazquez O, Weiss J and Morency F. Preliminary investigation on stall characteristics of a Regional BWB for low speed approach. In: 35th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, 2017, no. June, AIAA 2017-3738. Reston, VA: AIAA.

20.

Larkin

Coates

. A design analysis of vertical stabilisers for Blended Wing Body aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017; 64: 237–252.

21.

Wittmann R. Passenger acceptance of BWB configurations. In: 24th congress international council of the aeronautical sciences, Yokohama, Japan, 29 August – 3 September 2004.

22.

Antcliff KR, Guynn MD, Marien T, et al. Mission analysis and aircraft sizing of a hybrid-electric regional aircraft. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2016, AIAA 2016-1028. Reston, VA: AIAA.

23.

Nalianda

Singh

. Turbo-electric distributed propulsion – opportunities, benefits and challenges. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2014; 86: 543–549.

24.

Liu

Valencia

Teng

. Design point analysis of the turbofan-driven turboelectric distributed propulsion system with boundary layer ingestion. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2015; 230: 1139–1149.

25.

Welstead J and Felder JL. Conceptual design of a single-aisle turboelectric commercial transport with fuselage boundary layer ingestion. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2016, AIAA 2016-1027. Reston, VA: AIAA.

26.

Kim

Liou

M-S

. Flow simulation and optimal shape design of N3-X hybrid wing body configuration using a body force method. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017; 71: 661–674.

27.

Gupta R, Schetz JA and Kapania RK. Conceptual design of complex transonic aircraft configurations with flutter prediction. In: 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, 2017, AIAA 2017-0571. Reston, VA: AIAA.

28.

Embraer 170 airplane operations manual. AOM-1502-010, 2015.

29.

Roskam

. Airplane design, part I: preliminary sizing of aircraft, Lawrence, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1985.

30.

Roskam

. Airplane design, part V: component weight estimation, Lawrence, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1985.

31.

Dababneh

Kipouros

. A review of aircraft wing mass estimation methods. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 72: 256–266.

32.

Chiozzotto

. Wing weight estimation in conceptual design: a method for strut-braced wings considering static aeroelastic effects. CEAS Aeronaut J 2016; 7: 499–519.

33.

Elham

van Tooren

MJL

. Tool for preliminary structural sizing, weight estimation, and aeroelastic optimization of lifting surfaces. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2016; 230: 280–295.

34.

Chiozzotto GP. Initial weight estimate of advanced transport aircraft concepts considering aeroelastic effects. In: 55th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2017, AIAA 2017-0009. Reston, VA: AIAA.

35.

Torenbeek

. Synthesis of subsonic airplane design, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1982.

36.

Roskam

. Airplane design, part II: preliminary configuration design and integration of the propulsion system, Lawrence, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1985.

37.

Drela M. AVL (Athena Vortex Lattice). MIT.edu, http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/avl/ (accessed 17 July 2016).

38.

Roskam

. Airplane design, part VI: preliminary calculation of aerodynamic, thrust and power characteristics, Lawrence, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1987.

39.

Roskam

. Airplane design, part VIII: airplane cost estimation, Lawrence, KS: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1990.

40.

Jackson P. Jane’s all the world’s aircraft: development & production 2017-2018. 2017.

41.

Bradley MK, Droney CK, Allen TJ, et al. Subsonic ultra green aircraft research: phase II - volume I - truss braced wing design exploration. NASA, NASA/CR-2015-218704/Volume I, 2015.

42.

Khalid SJ. Performance enhancement of subsonic turbofans. In: SAE 2016 aerospace systems and technology conference, 2016, SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-2018.

43.

Lolis P. Development of a preliminary weight estimation method for advanced turbofan engines. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, UK, 2014.

44.

Secco NR and Martins JRRA. RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a strut-braced wing with overset meshes. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, January 2018, pp.1–21, AIAA 2018-0413.

45.

Chakraborty

Nam

Gross

, et al. Comparative assessment of strut-braced and truss-braced wing configurations using multidisciplinary design optimization. J Aircraft 2015; 52: 2009–2020.

46.

Ciornei S. Mach number, relative thickness, sweep and lift coefficient of the wing–an empirical investigation of parameters and equations. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, DGLR, Bonn, Germany, 2005.

47.

Andrews

Perez

. Comparison of box-wing and conventional aircraft mission performance using multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Aerosp Sci Technol 2018; 79: 336–351.

48.

Reist T and Zingg DW. Aerodynamically optimal regional aircraft concepts: conventional and blended-wing-body designs. In: 52nd aerospace sciences meeting, January 2014, AIAA 2014-0905. Reston, VA: AIAA.

49.

Suresh

Ramesh

Paramaguru

. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a non-planar C-wing using CFD. Aerosp Sci Technol 2015; 40: 56–61.