Numerical simulation was carried out to study the influences of blade-bowing designs based on a highly loaded cascade with large turning angle, while the compound bowing design showed much lower endwall loss than the conventional design in this study. Generally, it showed that the increased turning angle would strengthen the adverse pressure gradient on the suction surface, so the side effect of negative blade bowing angle would be enhanced because of the reduced flow filed stability near suction–endwall corner. However, the positive corner bowing angle that applied in the compound bowing design would enhance the flow field stability near the suction–endwall corner by adjusting spanwise pressure gradient and velocity triangle, so the side effect of negative blade bowing angle would be suppressed and lead to weaker secondary flow. In detail, the blade bowing angle (as well as the corner bowing angle in the conventional bowed cascades) was varied from −5° to −30° in this study, while the reductions of the loss coefficient in the compound bowed cascades were about 0.662.16 times higher (the absolute differences were about 0.0067 0.0097) than the corresponding conventional bowed cascades. Moreover, the Reynolds number and Mach number at the outlet plane were kept at 2.4 × 105 and 0.6, respectively, during the bowing design to ensure the comparability.
DentonJD. The 1993 IGTI scholar lecture: loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach1993; 115: 621–656.
2.
WangHPOlsonSJGoldsteinRJ, et al.Flow visualization in a linear turbine cascade of high performance turbine blades. J Turbomach1997; 119: 1–8.
3.
LangstonLS. Secondary flows in axial turbines—a review. Ann NY Acad Sci2001; 934: 11–26.
4.
CuiJNagabhushana RaoVTuckerPG. Numerical investigation of secondary flows in a high-lift low pressure turbine. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2017; 63: 149–157.
5.
WangXFZhouXWangST, et al.Numerical study on the compressor aerodynamics performance of positive curved rotor blade. Turb Technol2009; 51: 401–403.
6.
Wang ZQ, Lai SK and Xu WY. Aerodynamic calculation of turbine stator cascades with curvilinear leaned blades and some experimental results. Symposium of 5th ISABE. Bangalore, India, 1981.
7.
HanWJWangZQTanCQ, et al.Effects of leaning and curving of blades with high turning angles on the aerodynamic characteristics of turbine rectangular cascades. J Turbomachin1994; 116: 417–424.
8.
Wang ZQ and Han WJ. The influence of blade negative curving on the endwall and blade surface flows. In: ASME 1995 International gas turbine and aeroengine congress and exposition. New York, USA, 1995, p.V001T001A106. Volume 1: Turbomachinery.
9.
TanCQYamamotoAMizukiS, et al.Influences of blade bowing on flowfields of turbine stator cascades. AIAA J2003; 41: 1967–1972.
10.
TanCQYamamotoAChenHS, et al.Flowfield and aerodynamic performance of a turbine stator cascade with bowed blades. AIAA J2004; 42: 2170–2171.
11.
ZhengXLanC. Improvement in the performance of a high-pressure-ratio turbocharger centrifugal compressor by blade bowing and self-recirculation casing treatment. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2014; 228: 73–84.
12.
XieJXiaCZhangY, et al.Micro axial turbine bowed blade design at low aspect radio. J Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2015; 41: 161–166.
13.
ClarkJPAnthonyRJOotenMK, et al.Effects of downstream vane bowing and asymmetry on unsteadiness in a transonic turbine. J Turbomach2018; 140: 101006–101006.
14.
YaoHZhouX. A pioneering method for reducing water droplet eosion. J Fluids Eng2018; 140: 061401–061401-061405.
15.
YaoHZhouXWangZ. Using a bowed blade to improve the supersonic flow performance in the nozzle of a supersonic industrial steam turbine. J Eng Gas Turb Power2017; 139: 102604–102604.
16.
JingjumZJiexianSZhongqiW, et al.Experimental investigation on surface static pressure distributions in curved-blade compressor cascade. J Aerospace Power1994; 9: 255–331.
17.
WangZSuJZhongJ. New progress of investigation into mechanism of reducing energy loss in cascades with curved and twisted blades. J Eng Thermophys1994; 15: 147–152.
18.
TanCQZhangHLChenHS, et al.Flow fields and losses downstream of an ultra-highly loaded turbine cascade with bowed blades. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy2011; 225: 131–140.
19.
CoullJD. Endwall loss in turbine cascades. J Turbomach2017; 139: 081004–081004.
20.
MoustaphaSHParonGJWadeJHT. Secondary flows in cascades of highly loaded turbine blades. J Eng Gas Turb Power1985; 107: 1031–1038.
21.
Prakash C, Cherry DG, Shin HW, et al. Effect of loading level and distribution on LPT losses. In: ASME turbo expo 2008: power for land, sea, and air. Berlin, Germany, 2008, pp.917–925.
22.
HowellRJHodsonHPSchulteV, et al.Boundary layer development in the BR710 and BR715 LP turbines—the implementation of high-lift and ultra-high-lift concepts. J Turbomach2002; 124: 385–392.
23.
ChenSWZhouZHWangST, et al.Numerical investigation of boundary layer suction on certain highly loaded aspirated compressor at low speeds cascade. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 30–41.
24.
QuXZhangYFLuXE, et al.The effect of endwall boundary layer and incoming wakes on secondary flow in a high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade at low Reynolds number. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2019; 233: 5637–5649.
25.
TsujitaHYamamotoA. Influences of incidence angle on 2d-flow and secondary flow structure in ultra-highly loaded turbine cascade. J Therm Sci2014; 23: 13–21.
26.
ZhangHLTanCQDongXZ, et al.Experimental investigation on the influence of bowed blade in ultra-highly loaded turbine cascade. J Aerospace Power2009; 24: 2314–2318.
27.
ChenSChenFWangK, et al.Aerodynamic performance study of curved compressor cascades with different camber angles. J Propul Technol2007; 28: 170–175.
28.
TanCQZhangHLChenHS, et al.Blade bowing effect on aerodynamic performance of a highly loaded turbine cascade. J Propul Power2010; 26: 604–608.
29.
MATLAB. Documentation Center, Release 97, 2019.
30.
XuWJDuXWangST, et al.Correlation of solidity and curved blade in compressor cascade design. Appl Therm Eng2018; 131: 244–259.
31.
ZweifelO. The spacing of turbo-machine blading, especially with large angular deflection. Brown Boveri Rev1945; 32: 436–444.
32.
BearPWolffMGrossA, et al.Experimental investigation of total pressure loss development in a highly loaded low-pressure turbine cascade. J Turbomach2017; 140: 031003–031003.
33.
CoullJDHodsonHP. Blade loading and its application in the mean-line design of low pressure turbines. J Turbomach2013; 135: 021032–021032.
34.
HuntJCRWrayAMoinP. Eddies, stream and convergence zones in turbulent flows, Stanford, CA: Stanford University: Center for Turbulence Research, 1988.
35.
HallerG. An objective definition of a vortex. J Fluid Mech2005; 525: 1–26.
36.
ANSYS CFX. Reference guide, Release 15, 2013.
37.
AmiralaeiMRAlighanbariHHashemiSM. Numerical modelling of a low Reynolds number plunging airfoil flow field characteristics. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2013; 227: 1251–1264.
38.
BarderaRMeseguerJ. Flow in the near air wake of a modified frigate. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2015; 229: 1003–1012.
39.
HaoYLiuYLiQ, et al.Turbulence characteristics in corner separation in a highly loaded linear compressor cascade. Aerospace Sci Technol2018; 75: 139–154.
40.
WangWLuZDengK, et al.An experimental study of compressible combining flow at 45° T-junctions. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2015; 229: 1600–1610.
41.
KurzJHoegerMNiehuisR. Active boundary layer control on a highly loaded turbine exit case profile. Int J Turbomach Propul Power2018; 3: 1–14.
42.
ZhongJ. An experimental investigation by using curved blade to control secondary flow in compressor cascade, Heilongjiang, China: Harbin Institute of Technology, 1996.
43.
LingJ. Study of the influence of cascade parameters on curved blade loss and deviation in compressor cascade, Heilongjiang, China: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015.
44.
NUMECA IGG AUTOGRID. User manual, Release 4, 2007.
45.
WangQ-CWangZ-GSunM-B, et al.The amplification of large-scale motion in a supersonic concave turbulent boundary layer and its impact on the mean and statistical properties. J Fluid Mech2019; 863: 454–493.
46.
WangQ-cWangZ-gZhaoY-x. The impact of streamwise convex curvature on the supersonic turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids2017; 29: 116106–116106.
