In this study, variable camber technology is applied to improve the fuel efficiency of high-aspect-ratio aircraft with aeroelasticity considered. The nonlinear static aeroelastic analyses are conducted for CFD/CSD (computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics) numerical simulations. The RBF (radial basis function) method is adopted for the transmission of aerodynamic loads and structural displacements, the diffusion smoothing method is employed for grid deformation in each iteration of CFD/CSD coupling, and the FFD (free-form deformation) method is introduced for the parameterization of variable camber wing. Based on the aerodynamic characteristic curves under different cambers, the discrete variable camber control matrix for the high-aspect-ratio aircraft during the cruise phase is established. The Fibonacci method is employed to optimize the fuel efficiency by utilizing the control matrix. The results indicate that the drag during the cruise phase is reduced obviously and the fuel efficiency is improved evidently comparing to the original configuration.
TimnakNJahangirianA.Multi-point optimization of transonic airfoils using an enhanced genetic algorithm. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2018; 232: 1347–1360.
2.
UrnesJNguyenNIppolitoC, et al. A mission-adaptive variable camber flap control system to optimize high lift and cruise lift-to-drag ratios of future N+3 transport aircraft. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Grapevine, Texas, 7–10 January 2013. AIAA paper 0214, pp. 1–24. Reston, VA: AIAA.
3.
KantorERavehDECavallaroR.Nonlinear structural, nonlinear aerodynamic model for static aeroelastic problems. AIAA J2019; 57: 1–13.
4.
AbzugMJLarrabeeEE.Airplane stability and control: a history of the technologies that made aviation possible. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 5.
5.
KotaS. Shape control of adaptive structures using compliant mechanisms. Final Technical Report, 24 Mar 2000. ADA376131.
6.
MarquesMGamboaPAndradeE. Design of a variable camber flap for minimum drag and improved energy efficiency. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Palm Springs, CA, 4–7 May 2009. AIAA paper 2196, pp. 1–19. Reston, VA: AIAA.
7.
De GaspariARicciSAntunesA, et al. Application of active camber morphing concept to a regional aircraft. In: 22nd AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference, National Harbor, Maryland, 3–17 January 2014. AIAA paper 1259, pp. 1–23. Reston, VA: AIAA.
8.
YokozekiTSugiuraA. Development and wind tunnel test of variable camber morphing wing. In: 22nd AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference, National Harbor, MD, 13–17 January 2014. AIAA paper 1261, pp. 1–8. Reston, VA: AIAA.
9.
StanfordBK.Static and dynamic aeroelastic tailoring with Variable-Camber control. J Guid Control Dynam2016; 39: 1–13.
10.
UrnesJNguyenNDykmanJ. Development of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap system. In: NASA fundamental aeronautics 2012 technical conference, Cleveland, OH, 13 March 2012. Washington, DC: NASA.
11.
IppolitoCNguyenNTotahJ, et al. Initial assessment of a variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap system on a rigid wing for drag reduction in subsonic cruise. In: AIAA Infotech@Aerospace conference, Boston, MA, 1922 August 2013. AIAA paper 5143, pp. 1–22. Reston, VA: AIAA.
12.
KaulUKNguyenNT. Drag optimization study of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) using overflow. In: 32nd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Atlanta, GA, 16–20 June 2014. AIAA paper 2444, pp. 1–20. Reston, VA: AIAA.
13.
LebofskySTingENguyenN. Multidisciplinary drag optimization of reduced stiffness flexible wing aircraft with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap. In: 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, FL, 5–9 January 2015. AIAA paper 1408, pp. 1–27. Reston, VA: AIAA.
14.
LyuZJMartinsJRRA.Aerodynamic shape optimization of an adaptive morphing trailing-edge wing. J Aircraft2015; 52: 1951–1970.
SanchesLGuimarãesTAMMarquesF.Aeroelastic tailoring of nonlinear typical section using the method of multiple scales to predict post-flutter stable LCOs. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 90: 157–168.
17.
LiDGuoSXiangJ.Modeling and nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of a wing with morphing trailing edge. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2013; 227: 619–631.
18.
HaaseWSelminVWinzellB. Progress in computational flow-structure interaction. In: Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design. Vol. 81. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2002.
19.
YaoWMarquesS.Application of a high-order CFD harmonic balance method to nonlinear aeroelasticity. J Fluids Struct2017; 74: 427–444.
20.
XuMAnXMSlC.CFD/CSD couping numerical computational methodology. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica2006; 27: 33–37. (in Chinese).
21.
CuiPHanJ.Investigation of nonlinear aeroelastic analysis using CFD/CSD. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica2010; 31: 480–486. (in Chinese).
22.
MianHHWangGYeZY.Numerical investigation of structural geometric nonlinearity effect in high-aspect-ratio wing using CFD/CSD coupled approach. J Fluid Struct2014; 49: 186–201.
23.
CasasVDPenaFLDuroRJ. Mesh modification strategy for aerodynamic design through evolution. In: IEEE workshop on intelligent data acquisition & advanced computing systems: Technology & applications. Dortmund, Germany, 6–8 September 2007.
24.
TaoJSunGSiJZ, et al. A robust design for a winglet based on NURBS-FFD method and PSO algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol2017; 70: 568–577.
25.
TaoJSunGWangXY, et al. Robust optimization for a wing at drag divergence Mach number based on an improved PSO algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol2019; 92: 653–667.
26.
WangTYWüchnerRSicklingerS, et al. Assessment and improvement of mapping algorithms for non-matching meshes and geometries in computational FSI. Comput Mech2016; 57: 793–816.
27.
AhrenRBeckertAWendlandH.A meshless spatial coupling scheme for large-scale fluid-structure interaction problems. CMES-Comp Model Eng2006; 12: 121–136.
28.
JacobsonKKiviahoJFSmithMJ, et al. 2018. An aeroelastic coupling framework for time-accurate analysis and optimization. In: 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, AIAA paper 0100, pp. 1–19. Reston, VA: AIAA.
29.
RiversMBDittbernerA. Experimental Investigations of the NASA common research model in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility and NASA Ames 11-Ft transonic wind tunnel (Invited). In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition. Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2011. AIAA paper 1126, pp. 1–28. Reston, VA: AIAA.
30.
RiversMBRudnikRQuestJ. Comparison of the NASA common research model european transonic wind tunnel test data to NASA test data (Invited). In: 53rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 5–9 January 2015. AIAA paper 1093, pp. 1–36. Reston, VA: AIAA.
31.
WangYTSunYMengDH, et al. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic characteristics of CRM-WB model with support system and wing deformation. Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sinica2017; 38: 121202. (in Chinese).
32.
XiaCCTaoYPJiangTT, et al. Multiobjective shape optimization of a hypersonic lifting body using a correlation-based transition model. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2016; 230: 2220–2232.
33.
SubasiMYildirimNYildizB.An improvement on Fibonacci search method in optimization theory. Appl Math Comput2004; 147: 893–901.
