This paper investigates the design of a long-endurance unmanned helicopter (LEUH) with low rotor disc loading (LRDL) and low rotor speed (LRS). Due to the flaws in flying qualities caused by the LRDL and the LRS, this paper establishes a flying quality evaluation model in which handling qualities (FQs) and flight control (FC) are introduced into the distributed multi-objective collaborative optimization (DMOCO) of the helicopters. The comprehensive design optimization on preliminary parameters of the LEUH in wind shear is also carried out. Numerical simulation results show that the LRDL and the LRS technologies are successfully applied to LEUH, with the FQs and the flight performance considered. Compared with A160 LEUH, the payload load ratio is significantly improved.
PutrichGDrrwingC.Farnborough: A160 technical description: shifting up a gear. Flight Int2010; 178: 90–93.
2.
MistéGABeniniE.Variable-speed rotor helicopters: performance comparison between continuously variable and fixed-ratio transmissions. J Helicopter2016; 53: 1189–1200.
3.
GarreWAmriHPflummT, et al. Helicopter configurations and drive train concepts for optimal variable rotor-speed utilization. Braunschweig, Germany: Deutscher Luftund Raumfahrtkongress, 2017.
4.
DeSmidtHASmithECBillRC, et al. Comprehensive modeling and analysis of rotorcraft variable speed propulsion system with coupled engine/transmission/rotor dynamics. NASA/CR-2013-216502, 2013.
5.
AmriHFeilRHajekM, et al. Possibilities and difficulties for rotorcraft using variable transmission drive trains. CEAS Aeronaut J2016; 7: 333–344.
6.
SteinerJH.An investigation of performance benefits and trim requirements of a variable speed helicopter rotor. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 2008.
7.
RobertsonCDReichertTM.Design and development of the atlas human-powered helicopter. J Am Helicopter Soc2015; 60: 1–15.
8.
SteinerJGandhiFYoshizakiY.An investigation of variable rotor RPM on performance and trim.Annual Forum Proc – Am Helicopter Soc2008; 64: 697.
9.
RobertTNC.An exploratory investigation of the flight dynamics effects of rotor RPM variations and rotor state feedback in hover. NASA-TM-1039687, 1992.
10.
PadfieldGD.Rotorcraft handling qualities engineering; managing the tension between safety and performance.J Am Helicopter Soc2013; 58: 1–27.
11.
SchrageDPMcCandlessW.Integrated product/process development approach for balancing technology push and pull between the user and developer. In: AHS International 68th annual forum. Fort Eustis, VA: American Helicopter Society, Inc., 2012, pp.186–211.
12.
VuNALinTAzamatovA, et al. Development of integrated rotorcraft design and virtual manufacturing framework. Helicopter Eng Aerosp Technol2011; 83: 171–185.
13.
BasketBJ. ADS-33E-PRF: aeronautical design standard performance specification handling qualities requirements for military rotorcraft. United States Army Aviation and Missile Command, Aviation Engineering Directorate, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 2000.
14.
ChenNYMengZJHuangJ.Research on flying quality of unmanned helicopter. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut2016; 42: 337–344.
15.
TischlerMBRempleRK.Helicopter and rotorcraft system identification: engineering methods and flight test examples. 2nd ed. AIAA Education Series. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2012.
16.
BridgesDHornJRayA. Model-following control of a military helicopter with damage mitigation. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference and exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2005, p.6347.
17.
FrostCHindsonWMoralezE, et al. Design and testing of flight control laws on the rascal research helicopter. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit. Reston, VA: AIAA: 2002, p.4869.
18.
DiazPVJohnsonWAhmadJ, et al. Computational study of the side-by-side urban air taxi concept. In: VFS 75th annual forum, Pennsylvania, USA, 2019.
LinJGG.Analysis and enhancement of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design.AIAA J2004; 42: 348–360.
21.
JohnsonW.NDARC: NASA design and analysis of rotorcraft. NASA-TP-2015-218751, 2015.
22.
PittDMPetersDA.Theoretical prediction of dynamic inflow derivatives. Vertica1981; 5: 21–34.
23.
Federal Aviation Administration. Wind shear training aid. Washington, DC: Author, 1986.
24.
TischlerMBIvlerCMMansurMH, et al. Handling-qualities optimization and trade-offs in rotorcraft flight control design. In: Proceedings of the RAeS rotorcraft handling-qualities conference, University of Liverpool, UK; 2008: 1–40.
