CFD-CSD method for coupled rotor-fuselage vibration analysis with free wake-panel coupled model

Abstract

An efficient comprehensive vibration analysis method for a helicopter rotor–fuselage coupling system is presented. This loose computational fluid dynamics (CFD)/computational structural dynamics (CSD) coupling approach with a free wake–panel coupled model is used for system vibration response analysis. The CSD model of the helicopter consists of a fuselage model using a refined three dimensional (3 D) finite element model (FEM) and a rotor model consisting of nonlinear moderate deflection beam elements with 15 degrees of freedom. The unsteady Euler CFD solver is used for the flow field analysis of the entire vehicle. The induced inflow of the quasi-steady aerodynamic force is calculated with the free wake–panel coupled model, which is used to simulate rotor–fuselage aerodynamic interference. Using a full-scale helicopter as an example, the vibration responses of the typical fuselage position in hovering and level flights are analysed. When compared with the literature results and flight test data, the predictions of the proposed method are closer to the test data than those of the traditional method in hovering and low forward ratio flights, and the difference between the two methods is minimal in high forward ratio flight.

Keywords

CFD/CSD coupling rotor-fuselage coupling FEM free wake-panel coupled method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gerstenberger

and Wood

ER.

Analysis of helicopter aeroelastic characteristics in high-speed flight. AIAA J 1963; 1: 2366–2381.

Staley

and Sciarra

JJ.

Coupled rotor/airframe vibration prediction methods. In: AHS/NASA-Ames specialists meeting on rotorcraft dynamics, Durham North Carolina, 13–15 February 1971.

Hsu

and Peters

DA.

Coupled rotor/airframe vibration analysis by a combined harmonic-balance impedance-matching method. J Am Helicopter Soc 1982; 27: 25–34.

Gable

and Sankewitsch

DA.

Rotor-fuselage coupling by impedance. In: 42nd annual forum of the American helicopter society, Washington, DC, 2–4 June 1986.

Yeo

and Chopra

Coupled rotor/fuselage vibration analysis using detailed 3-D airframe models. In: 40th structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit. St. Louis, MO USA, 12–15 April 1999.

Yeo

and Chopra

Coupled rotor/fuselage vibration analysis for teetering rotor and test data comparison. J Aircraft 2001; 38: 111–121.

Mao

Chopra

and Haas

DJ.

Vibration prediction for rotor system with faults using coupled rotor-fuselage model. J Aircraft 2004; 41: 348–358.

Klausdieter

and Wall

VDBG.

Chimera simulations of multibladed rotors in high-speed forward flight with weak fluid-structure-coupling. Aerosp Sci Technol 2005; 9: 379–389.

Potsdam

Yeo

and Johnson

Rotor airloads prediction using loose aerodynamic/structural coupling. J Aircraft 2006; 43: 732–742.

10.

Han

and Hw

Aeroelasticity of helicopters. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sinica 2015; 36: 1034–1055.

11.

Chen

Han

and Hw

CFD/CSD method for coupled rotor/fuselage vibration analysis. J Vibra Eng 2014; 27: 370–376.

12.

Shi

, et al. A coupling VWM/CFD/CSD method for rotor airload prediction. Chinese J Aeronautics 2017; 30: 204–215.

13.

Anusonti-Inthra

Full vehicle simulations for a coaxial rotorcraft using high-fidelity CFD/CSD coupling. In: AIAA SciTech forum, Kissimmee, Florida, 8–12 January 2018.

14.

Schaferlein

KeBler

and Kramer

Aeroelastic simulation of the tail shake phenomenon. J Am Helicopter Soc 2018; 63: 032003.

15.

Ilie

A fully-coupled CFD/CSD computational approach for aeroelastic studies of helicopter blade-vortex interaction. Appl Math Comput 2019; 347: 122–142.

16.

Klimchenko

and Baeder

CFD/CSD study of interactional aerodynamics of a coaxial and compound helicopter in high-speed forward flight. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 forum, Orlando, FL, 6–10 January 2020.

17.

Komerath

Smith

and Tung

A review of rotor wake physics and modeling. J Am Helicopter Soc 2011; 56: 22006–2200619.

18.

Crouse

Leishman

and Naipei

Theoretical and experimental study of unsteady rotor/body aerodynamic interactions. J Am Helicopter Soc 1992; 37: 55–65.

19.

UMARC, University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code, Theory Manual. Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, July 1994.

20.

Vellaichamy

and Chopra

Aeroelastic response of helicopters with flexible fuselage modeling. In: 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and material conference, Dallas Texas, 13–15 April 1992.

21.

Bagai

and Leishman

JG.

Rotor free-wake modeling using a pseudo implicit relaxation algorithm. J Aircraft 1995; 32: 1276–1285.

22.

Hess

and Smith

AMO.

Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three dimensional bodies. J Ship Research 1964; 8: 22–44.

23.

Mineck

and Gorton

SA.

Steady and periodic pressure measurements on a generic helicopter fuselage model in the presence of a rotor. Report no. NASA TM-210286, 2000.

24.

Tung

Caradonna

and Johnson

The prediction of transonic flows on an advancing rotor. J Am Helicopter Soc 1986; 31: 4–9.

25.

Arthur

and Berry

DB.

Description of the U. S. Army small-scale 2-meter rotor test system. Report no. NASA TM-87762, 1987.