In this article, optimum adaptive sliding mode controller (ASMC) optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is designed to solve the trajectory tracking control problems of a quadcopter with model parameter uncertainties. Quadcopters have nonlinear, multi-input multi-output, coupled and under-actuated dynamics. For comparison with the designed controller, an adaptive integral backstepping controller approach is applied to compensate mass and inertia uncertainties of the flying robot. These methods guarantee stability of closed-loop system and force the states to track desired reference signals. The performance of both controllers is evaluated by numerical simulations. The obtained results demonstrate the better effectiveness of the designed PSO ASMC in stabilization of tracking particularly with parameter uncertainties.
MalaekSMKosariAR. Dynamic based cost functions for TF/TA flights. IEEE Transaction Aerospace Electron Syst2012; 48: 44–63.
2.
SabourMHKosariARAhadi KolooF, et al.Fuzzy control for path tracking and obstacle avoidance of a qudrotor flight. In: Proceedings of IEEE Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, 2015. IEEE, pp.852–857.
3.
AskariAMortazaviMTalebiHA, et al.A new approach in UAV path planning using Bezier-Dubins continuous curvature path. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2016; 230: 1103–1113.
4.
KouhiHKabganianMShahraviM, et al.Retrofiring control method via combination of a 1DoF gimbaled thrust vector control and spin-stabilization. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2017; 231: 1199–1212.
5.
NavabiMDavoodiAReyhanogluM. Modeling and control of a nonlinear coupled sapcecraft-fuel system. Acta Astronautica2019; 162: 436–446.
6.
AsadiDAhmadiK. Nonlinear robust adaptive control of an airplane with structural damage. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2020; 234: 2076–2088.
7.
NavabiMDavoodiAReyhanogluM. Optimum fuzzy sliding mode control of fuel sloshing in a spacecraft using PSO algorithm. Acta Astronautica2020; 167: 331–342.
8.
NavabiMHosseiniS. A hybrid PSO fuzzy-MRAC controller based on EULERINT for satellite attitude control. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems, 2020. IEEE, pp. 33–38.
9.
NavabiMSafaei HashkavaeiN. Nonlinear attitude control of satellite using optimal adaptive and fuzzy control methods. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems, 2020, IEEE, pp. 51–55.
10.
BouabdallahSNothASiegwartR. PID vs LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004, Vol. 3, pp. 2451–2456.
11.
PoundsPMahonyRCorkeP. Modelling and control of a large quadrotor robot. J Control Eng Pract2010; 18: 691–699.
12.
CowlingIDWhidborneJFCookeAK. Optimal trajectory planning and LQR control for a quadrotor UAV. In: Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on Control, 2006.
13.
GuichardJ.LQR control for a quadrotor using unit quaternions: Modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computing, 2013, pp.172–178.
14.
PanomrattanarugBHiguchiKMora-CaminoF. Attitude control of a quadrotor aircraft using LQR state feedback controller with full order state observer. In: Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference, 2013, pp. 2041–2046.
15.
Da SilvaALDa CruzJJ. Fuzzy adaptive extended Kalman filter for UAV INS/GPS data fusion. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2016; 38: 1671–1688.
16.
VianaLBDos SantosDAGoesLCS. Formation control of multirotor aerial vehicles using decentralized MPC. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2018; 40: 1–12
17.
NavabiMMirzaeiH. θ-D based nonlinear tracking control of quadcopter. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, 2016, IEEE, pp. 331–336.
18.
NavabiMSoleymanpourS. Immersion and invariance based adaptive control of aerial robot in presence of inertia uncertainty. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, 2017. IEEE, pp.959–964.
19.
AhmadiKAsadiDPazookiF. Nonlinear L1 adaptive control of an airplane with structural damage. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2019; 233: 341–353.
20.
AlkamachiAErcelebiE. A proportional derivative sliding mode control for an overactuated quadcopter. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2019; 233: 1354–1363.
21.
SanwaleJTrivediPKothariM. Quaternion-based position control of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle using robust nonlinear third-order sliding mode control with disturbance cancellation. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2020; 234: 997–1013.
22.
VoosH. Nonlinear control of a quadrotor micro-UAV using feedback- linearization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, 2009. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
23.
ChoiYAhnH. Nonlinear control of quadrotor for point tracking: Actual implementation and experimental tests. Ieee/asme Trans Mechatron2015; 20: 1179–1192.
24.
AshfaqAMDaoboW. Modeling and backstepping–based nonlinear control strategy for a 6 DOF quadrotor helicopter. Chin J Aeronaut2008; 21: 261–268.
25.
JasimWDongbingG. Integral backstepping controller for quadrotor path tracking. In: International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 2015, pp.593–598.
26.
NavabiMSoleymanpourS. Integrated adaptive backstepping attitude control of spacecraft. In: Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, 2017. IEEE, pp. 949–954.
27.
NavabiMMirzaeiH. Robust optimal adaptive trajectory tracking control of quadrotor helicopter. Lat Am J Sol Stru2017; 14: 1043–1066.
28.
SayadiMKosariARMohammadzadehP. Robust optimal control for precision improvement of guided gliding vehicle positioning. IEEE Access2018; 6: 25797–25815.
29.
YanKChenMWuQ. Neural network-based adaptive fault tolerant tracking control for unmanned autonomous helicopters with prescribed performance. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2019; 233: 4350–4362.
30.
NavabiMSafaei HashkavaeiN. Design of optimal adaptive control for satellite attitude in presence of uncertainty in moment of inertia. In: Proceedings of 5th IEEE International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation, 2019, IEEE, pp. 478–483.
31.
NavabiMMirzaeiHDavoodiA. Optimum design of robust adaptive controller with actuator constraints. Int J Control Automation Syst2020; 18: 2734–2741.
32.
BressanGRussoAInvernizziD. Adaptive augmentation of attitude control system for a multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Part G: J Aerospace Eng2020; 234: 1587–1596.
33.
DydekZTAnnaswamyAMLavretskyE. Adaptive control of quadrotor UAVs in the presence of actuator uncertainties. In: AIAA Infotech@ Aerospace, AIAA 2010-3416, 2010, pp. 1–9.
34.
SadeghzadehIMehtaAZhangY. Fault/damage tolerant control of a quadrotor helicopter UAV using model reference adaptive control and gain-scheduled PID. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA 2011-6716, 2011, pp. 1–20.
35.
HuangMXianBDiaoC, et al.Adaptive tracking control of underactuated quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles via backstepping. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2010, pp. 2076–2081.
36.
LiuHYLiJYaoJG, et al.Backstepping based adaptive control for a mini rotorcraft with four rotors. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, 2010, pp. 472–476.
37.
ChenWBifengSNahonM. Adaptive robust backstepping (ARB) control for quadrotor robot in presence of payload variation and unknown disturbances. Int J Control Autom2016; 9: 417–434.
38.
BouabdallahSSiegwartR. Full control of a quadrotor. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 153–158.
Al–YounesYJarrahMASukkariehS. Adaptive integral backstepping controller for an autonomous rotorcraft. In: 6th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications, 2009, pp. 1–7.
