A 6-DOF extended state observer–based adaptive generalized super twisting algorithm of fault-tolerant control for coupled spacecraft with actuator saturation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2023
A 6-DOF extended state observer–based adaptive generalized super twisting algorithm of fault-tolerant control for coupled spacecraft with actuator saturation
This paper aims to address an integrated relative attitude and position fault-tolerant control strategy between a follower spacecraft and a leader spacecraft for coupled spacecraft tracking maneuver in the case of inertia parametric uncertainties, external disturbances, actuator failures, and saturation. The coupled rotational and translational kinematics and dynamics of the rigid spacecraft are derived on the Lie group SE(3), where the actuator failures and saturation are taken into account. Then, a 6-DOF extended state observer is proposed by using terminal sliding mode technique to estimate the lumped disturbance in finite time. An adaptive generalized super twisting algorithm of fault-tolerant controller is developed to guarantee the finite-time stability based on the estimated lumped disturbance information. The stability of the closed-loop system is proved in spite of the aforementioned disturbances via the Lyapunov analysis. Finally, the numerical simulation illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy.
ZhangJQYeDLiuM, et al.. Adaptive fuzzy finite-time control for spacecraft formation with communication delays and changing topologies. J Franklin Inst2017; 354(11): 4377–4403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.04.018.
2.
HenryDZentenoTJCieslakJ, et al.A 6-DOF sliding mode fault tolerant control solution for in-orbit autonomous rendezvous. Aerospace Sci Tech2021; 118: 1270–9638. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107050.
3.
LiBHuQYangY, et al.Continuous finite-time extended state observer based fault tolerant control for attitude stabilization. Aerospace Sci Tech2019; 84: 204–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.006.
4.
HuangXYanY. Fully actuated spacecraft attitude control via the hybrid magnetocoulombic and magnetic torques. J Guidance Control Dyn2017; 40(12): 1–8. DOI: 10.2514/1.G002925.
5.
FragopoulosDInnocentiM. Autonomous spacecraft 6DOF relative motion control using quaternions and H-infinity methods. In: Proceedings of AIAA, Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, San Diego, USA, 1996, pp. 1–12.
6.
WangPKCHadaeghFYLauK, et al.. Synchronized formation rotation and attitude control of multiple free-flying spacecraft. J Guidance Control Dyn1999; 22(1): 28–35. DOI: 10.2514/2.4367.
7.
ZhangFDuanGR. Integrated relative position and attitude control of spacecraft in proximity operation missions. Int J Automation Comput2012; 9(4): 342–351. DOI: 10.1007/s11633-012-0654-0.
8.
ShiraziACeberioJLozanoJA, et al.Spacecraft trajectory optimization: a review of models, objectives, approaches and solutions. Prog Aerospace Sci2018; 102(1): 0376–0421. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.07.007.
9.
ShiKKLiuCSunZW, et al.. Coupled orbit-attitude dynamics and trajectory tracking control for spacecraft electromagnetic docking. Appl Math Model2022; 101: 553–572. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.030.
10.
LeiXZhangJQLiuC, et al.Fuzzy-logic-based adaptive event-triggered sliding mode control for spacecraft attitude tracking. Aerospace Sci Tech2021; 108; 106394. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106394.
11.
ZhangJQYeDSunZW, et al.Extended state observer based robust adaptive control on SE(3) for coupled spacecraft tracking maneuver with actuator saturation and misalignment. Acta Astronautica2017; 143: 221–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.11.034.
12.
LeeDVukovichGdoi. Robust Adaptive terminal sliding mode control on SE(3) for autonomous spacecraft rendezvous and docking. Nonlinear Dyn2016; 83(4): 2263–2279. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-015-2479-1.
13.
LeeDSanyalAKButcherEA. Asymptotic tracking control for spacecraft formation flying with decentralized collision avoidance. J Guidance Control Dyn2015; 38(4): 587–600. DOI: 10.2514/1.G000101.
14.
FarrellJAPolycarpouMSharmaM, et al.Backstepping-based flight control with adaptive function approximation. J Guidance Control Dyn2005; 28(6): 1089–1102. DOI: 10.2514/1.13030.
15.
SunLZhengZ. Disturbance-observer-based robust backstepping attitude stabilization of spacecraft under input saturation and measurement uncertainty. IEEE Trans Ind Elect2017; 64(10): 7994–8002. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2694349.
16.
ZhangFDuanGR. Integrated translational and rotational finite-time maneuver of a rigid spacecraft with actuator misalignment. Iet Control Theor Appl2012; 6(9): 1192–1204. DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0413.
17.
ZhangJQBiggsJDYeD, et al.Extended-state-observer-based event-triggered orbit-attitude tracking for low-thrust spacecraft. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst2020; 56(4): 2872–2883. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2019.2955257.
18.
LiuCYueXKZhangJQ, et al.Active disturbance rejection control for delayed electromagnetic docking of spacecraft in elliptical orbits. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst2022; 58(3): 2257–2268. DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3130830.
19.
GongKJLiaoYMeiYF. Extended state observer-based output feedback control for spacecraft pose tracking with control input saturation. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerospace Eng2021; 236: 1–16. ( to be published). DOI: 10.1177/09544100211017751.
20.
LeeDChoJHdoi. , et al.Spacecraft coupled tracking maneuver using sliding mode control with input saturation. J Aerospace Eng2021; 28(5): 1–11. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000473.
21.
MeiYFLiaoYGongKJ, et al.Adaptive fuzzy modified fixed-time fault-tolerant control on SE(3) for coupled spacecraft. Math Probl Eng2021; 2021(1): 1–21.doi:10.1155/2021/6648578.
22.
LiuCYueXKYangZY, et al.Are nonfragile controllers always better than fragile controllers in attitude control performance of post-capture flexible spacecraft?Aerospace Sci Tech2021; 118: 1270–9638. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107053.
23.
HanJQdoi. From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans Ind Elect2009; 56(3): 900–906. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621.
24.
WangWGaoZ. A comparison study of advanced state observer design techniques. Am Control Conf2003; 6: 4754–4759.
25.
YanRWuZ. Spacecraft attitude tracking via robust disturbance observer. In: 29th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC). Chongqing, China, 28–30 May 2017, IEEE, 2017, pp. 7415–7420. DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2017.7978526.
26.
LiangSWeiHJiaoZ. Disturbance observer-based robust relative pose control for spacecraft rendezvous and proximity operations under input saturation. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst2018; 54(4): 1605–1617. DOI: 10.1109/taes.2018.2798239.
27.
BaiYLBiggsJDZazzeraFB, et al.Adaptive attitude tracking with active uncertainty rejection. J Guidance, Control Dyn2018; 41(2): 546–554. DOI: 10.2514/1.G002391.
28.
YinLXiaYDengZ, et al.Extended state observer-based attitude fault-tolerant control of rigid spacecraft. Int J Syst Sci2018; 49(12): 2525–2535. DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2018.1498556.
29.
ZhaoZLGuoBZdoi. A novel extended state observer for output tracking of MIMO systems with mismatched uncertainty. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2018; 63(1): 211–218. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2720419.
30.
YangHXiuYXiaY, et al.Adaptive control for attitude synchronisation of spacecraft formation via extended state observer. IET Control Theor Appl2014; 8(18): 2171–2185.
31.
LevantAdoi. Sliding order and sliding accuracy in sliding mode control. Int J Control1993; 58(6): 1247–1263. DOI: 10.1080/00207179308923053.
32.
CastilloIFridmanLMorenoJA. Super-twisting algorithm in presence of time and state dependent perturbations. Int J Control2018; 91(11): 2535–2548. DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1269952.
33.
EdwardsCShtesselY. Adaptive dual layer second-order sliding mode control and observation. American Control Conference (ACC), July, 2015, pp. 5853–5858. DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7172257.
34.
NixonMShtesselYB. Adaptive double-layer continuous super-twisting control of a satellite formation. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, 2021. DOI: 10.2514/6.2021-0560.
