A review of advanced fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) techniques in attitude control systems (ACSs) of spacecraft is presented. In the first part of the paper, several types of ACS failure scenarios with their practical solutions are presented. Next, the existing approaches to FDD are considered and classified based on different criteria, including applications and design techniques. The literature of this part showed that to enhance ACS operational safety, predictability of failure of an ACS and/or of its components as well as reducing the possibility of failure occurrence is imperative. In addition, fast FDD of various kinds of failures is necessary to guarantee the required reliability of an ACS. The second part of this study highlights challenges involved with different FDD approaches, emphasizing their practical applicability. Current research gaps in FDD techniques such as insensitive residual signal, process monitoring methods, accurate plant model design, easy-to-use software development, FDD tuning process, dealing with noisy sensor measurements, time taken for fault management, the sensitivity of FDD system to faults, and FDD robustness are further elaborated on. Subsequently, the state-of-the-art FDD and its future needs are reflected on. The results of this study could direct spacecraft manufacturers and ACS providers to focus on future needs and improve ground testing for enhanced operational reliability and redundancy.
IsermannRBalléP. Trends in the application of model based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. IFAC Proceedings Volumes1996; 29(1): 6325–6336.
2.
GaoZCecatiCDingSX. A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques—part I: fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(6): 3757–3767.
3.
MahmoudMSXiaY. Analysis and synthesis of fault-tolerant control systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2013.
4.
YuXJiangJ. A survey of fault-tolerant controllers based on safety-related issues. Annu Rev Control2015; 39: 46–57.
5.
ZolghadriAHenryDCieslakJ, et al.Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control and guidance for aerospace vehicles. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2014.
6.
PirmoradiF. Fault detection and diagnosis in a spacecraft attitude determination system. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, 2005.
7.
Codetta-RaiteriDPortinaleL. Dynamic Bayesian networks for fault detection, identification, and recovery in autonomous spacecraft. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2015; 45(1): 13–24.
8.
Riera-GuaspMAntonino-DaviuJACapolinoG-A. Advances in electrical machine, power electronic, and drive condition monitoring and fault detection: state of the art. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(3): 1746–1759.
9.
IqbalRManiykTDoctorF, et al.Fault detection and isolation in industrial processes using deep learning approaches. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2019; 99: 1.
10.
GhasemiSKhorasaniK. Fault detection and isolation of the attitude control subsystem of spacecraft formation flying using extended Kalman filters. Int J Control2015; 88(10): 2154–2179.
11.
XiaoBHuQSinghoseW, et al.Reaction wheel fault compensation and disturbance rejection for spacecraft attitude tracking. J Guid Control Dyn2013; 36(6): 1565–1575.
12.
HassrizalHRossiterJ. A survey of control strategies for spacecraft attitude and orientation in control (CONTROL). In: 11th International Conference on 2016 UKACC. Hoboken, NJ, 2016.
13.
SmaeilzadehSMGolestaniM. A finite-time adaptive robust control for a spacecraft attitude control considering actuator fault and saturation with reduced steady-state error. Trans Inst Meas Control2018; 45: 0142331218785698.
14.
SamyIPostlethwaiteIGuD-W. Survey and application of sensor fault detection and isolation schemes. Cont Eng Prac2011; 19(7): 658–674.
15.
TipaldiMBruenjesB. Survey on fault detection, isolation, and recovery strategies in the space domain. J Aerosp Inf Syst2015; 12(2): 235–256.
16.
FonodRHenryDCharbonnelC, et al.Position and attitude model-based thruster fault diagnosis: a comparison study. J Guid Control Dyn2015; 38(6): 1012–1026.
17.
GaoCDuanG. Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for nonlinear satellite attitude control systems. Aerosp Sci Technol2014; 33(1): 9–15.
18.
HanYBiggsJDCuiN. Adaptive fault-tolerant control of spacecraft attitude dynamics with actuator failures. J Guid Control Dyn2015; 38(10): 2033–2042.
19.
WertzJR. Spacecraft attitude determination and control. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2012
20.
XiaoBHuQZhangY, et al.Fault-tolerant tracking control of spacecraft with attitude-only measurement under actuator failures. J Guid Control Dyn2014; 37(3): 838–849.
21.
GaoZHanBJiangG, et al.Active fault tolerant control design approach for the flexible spacecraft with sensor faults. J Franklin Inst2017; 354(18): 8038–8056.
22.
HarlandDMLorenzR. Space systems failures: disasters and rescues of satellites, rocket and space probes. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, pp. 9–12, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-27961-9.
23.
LiL. Fault detection and fault-tolerant control for nonlinear systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2016.
24.
DingSX. Model-based fault diagnosis techniques: design schemes, algorithms, and tools. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2008.
25.
BaldiPBlankeMCastaldiP, et al.Fault diagnosis for satellite sensors and actuators using nonlinear geometric approach and adaptive observers. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2019; 29(16): 5429–5455.
26.
WanderAFörstnerR. Innovative fault detection, isolation and recovery strategies on-board spacecraft: state of the art and research challenges. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft-und Raumfahrt-Lilienthal-Oberth eV, 2013.
27.
WangRChengYXuM. Analytical redundancy based fault diagnosis scheme for satellite attitude control systems. J Franklin Inst2015; 352(5): 1906–1931.
28.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHMohd AliMA. Three-axis attitude estimation of satellite through only two-axis magnetometer observations using LKF algorithm. Metrol Meas Syst2015; 22(4): 577–590.
29.
MiriSHMehrjardiMFMirshamsM. Optimal stabling of attitude maneuver for a special satellite with reaction wheel actuators. In: ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. New York, NJ, December, 2010
30.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHAliMAM. Developing a proposed satellite reaction wheel model with current mode control. In: Space Science and Communication (IconSpace), 2015 International Conference on 2015. Langkawi, Malaysia, 1-12 August 2015.
31.
MehrjardiMFMirshamsM. Design and manufacturing of a research magnetic torquer rod. Fourth International Conference on Experimental Mechanics2010; 3(5): 227–236.
32.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHAliMA, et al.PD controller for three-axis satellite attitude control using discrete Kalman filter. In: International Conference on Computer, Communications, and Control Technology (I4CT). Langkawi, Malaysia, 02-04 September 2014.
33.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHMohd AliMA, et al.Proportional derivative controller using discrete Kalman filter estimation method for spacecraft attitude control. Appl Mech Mater2015; 789–790: 923–926.
34.
ChoiHSLeeJChoK. et al.Analysis of GEO spacecraft anomalies: space weather relationships. Space Weather2011; 9(6): 2011.
35.
TafazoliM. A study of on-orbit spacecraft failures. Acta Astronaut2009; 64(2–3): 195–205.
36.
SalehJHCastetJ-F. Spacecraft reliability and multi-state failures: a statistical approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.
37.
PeltonJN. History of satellite communications. In: Handbook of satellite applications, Germany: Springer; 2016: pp. 1–41.
38.
KoppesС. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the beginning of American exploration of space. J Br Interplanet Soc1981; 34: 324.
39.
HarlandDMLorenzRD. Attitude control system failures. In: Space systems failures: disasters and rescues of satellites. rockets and space probes. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005: pp. 211–226.
40.
RobertsonBSabelhausPMendenhallT, et al.The recovery of TOMS-EP. NASA; 1998.
41.
ViswanathanSP. Design, dynamics and control of an adaptive singularity-free control moment gyroscope actuator for microspacecraft attitude determination and control system. Las Cruces, New Mexico: New Mexico State University, 2015.
42.
HemphillREdelsteinJ. Analysis of a chemical method to increase extreme ultraviolet microchannel-plate quantum efficiency international society for optics and photonics. In: Future EUV/UV and Visible Space Astrophysics Missions and Instrumentation. France: SPIE; 2003.
43.
KaslowD. 6.6. 2 Factors contributing to space system failures and successes. INCOSE International Symposium2003; 13: 992–1006.
44.
BurtRRLoffiRW. Failure analysis of international space station control moment gyro. In: 10th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium. France, 2003
45.
ZaretskyEV. Liquid lubrication in space. Tribology International1990; 23: 75–93.
46.
GurrisiCSeidalRDickersonS. et al.Space station control moment gyroscope lessons learned. NASA; 2010.
47.
DavisJPMayberryJPPennJP. On-orbit servicing: inspection repair refuel upgrade and assembly of satellites in space. The Aerospace Corporation, Report, CENTER FOR SPACE POLICY AND STRATEGY2019; 1–14.
NaikSRReliabilityAssuranceQ. Reliability and quality assurance in space applications hardware systems. IETE Techn Rev1989; 6(1): 16–25.
50.
WalterT. Satellite based augmentation systems. In: Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017, pp. 339–361.
51.
RussellMStraubJ. Characterization of command software for an autonomous attitude determination and control system for spacecraft. Inter J. Comp. Appl2017; 39(4): 198–209.
52.
EcoffetR. Radiation effects on embedded systems. In: In-flight anomalies on electronic devices. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007, pp. 31–68.
53.
CrosbyN. Solar extreme events 2005–2006: effects on near-earth space systems and interplanetary systems. Adv Space Res2009; 43(4): 559–564.
54.
SullivanBRAkinDLRoeslerG. A parametric investigation of satellite servicing requirements, revenues and options in geostationary orbit. In: Processdings of the AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition. Pasadena, California, 2015.
55.
YendlerB. Satellite rescue-luck of skillful application of technology. In: Processdings of the AIAA SPACE 2012 Conference and Exposition. Pasadena, California, 2012.
56.
JoshiAGovriliuV, BaruaA, et al.Intelligent and learning-based approaches for health monitoring and fault diagnosis of RADARSAT-1 attitude control system. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. New York, NJ, 2007.
57.
WatkinsN. The rebirth of the Russian space program: 50 years after Sputnik, New Frontiers. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union2008; 89(29): 264–265.
58.
SrinivasamurthyKGopinathN. Strategy analysis for colocation of INSAT-2 satellites. Acta Astronaut2002; 50(6): 343–349.
59.
ElleryAKreiselJSommerB. The case for robotic on-orbit servicing of spacecraft: spacecraft reliability is a myth. Acta Astronaut2008; 63(5–6): 632–648.
KovalevskyJFroeschleM. HIPPARCOS, three years after launch. In: Symposium-international astronomical union. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
62.
BaumRAMorrisonGESHoskinsJK. Prelaunch checkout of the inertial upper stage redundant IMU in the Magellan and Galileo missions. Navigation1991; 38(1): 53–70.
63.
McNallyD. Astronomy from Space L’Astronomie à partir de l’Espace, in reports on astronomy. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1991, pp. 505–540.
64.
FieselerPDArdalanSMFredericksonA. The radiation effects on Galileo spacecraft systems at Jupiter. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci2002; 49(6): 2739–2758.
65.
WiseMASalehJHHagaRA. Health scorecard of spacecraft platforms: track record of on-orbit anomalies and failures and preliminary comparative analysis. Acta Astronaut2011; 68(1–2): 253–268.
YinSXiaoBDingSX, et al.A review on recent development of spacecraft attitude fault tolerant control system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63(5): 3311–3320.
68.
WayerJKCastetJ-FSalehJH. Spacecraft attitude control subsystem: reliability, multi-state analyses, and comparative failure behavior in LEO and GEO. Acta Astronaut2013; 85: 83–92.
69.
PattonRJFrankPMClarkRN. Issues of fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013.
70.
YinSDingSXZhouD. Diagnosis and prognosis for complicated industrial systems—part II. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63(5): 3201–3204.
71.
YinSDingSXZhouD. Diagnosis and prognosis for complicated industrial systems—part I. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63(4): 2501–2505.
72.
MauryaMRRengaswamyRVenkatasubramanianV. Fault diagnosis by qualitative trend analysis of the principal components. Chem Eng Res Des2005; 83(9): 1122–1132.
73.
MauryaMRRengaswamyRVenkatasubramanianV. Computer aided chemical engineering. Qualitative trend analysis of the principal components: application to fault diagnosis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2003, pp. 968–973.
74.
MarzatJPiet-LahanierHDamongeotF, et al.Model-based fault diagnosis for aerospace systems: a survey. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2012; 226(10): 1329–1360.
75.
HenryDSimaniSPattonRJ. Fault detection and diagnosis for aeronautic and aerospace missions, in fault tolerant flight control. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2010, pp. 91–128.
76.
ErenUPrachAKocerBB, et al.Model predictive control in aerospace systems: current state and opportunities. J Guid Control Dyn2017; 40(7): 1541–1566.
77.
EstefanJA. Survey of model-based systems engineering (MBSE) methodologies. Incose MBSE Focus Group2007; 25(8): 1–12.
78.
ZhaoZLiuPXGaoJ. Model-based fault diagnosis methods for systems with stochastic process–a survey. Neurocomputing2022; 513: 137–152.
79.
SidiMJ. Cambridge university press. In: Spacecraft dynamics and control: a practical engineering approach, England: Cambridge press; 1997.
80.
FekihA. Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control design for aerospace systems: a bibliographical review. In: American control conference (ACC), New York, NY, 2014.
81.
JiangTKhorasaniKTafazoliS. Parameter estimation-based fault detection, isolation and recovery for nonlinear satellite models. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2008; 16(4): 799–808.
82.
LeHXMatunagaS. A residual based adaptive unscented Kalman filter for fault recovery in attitude determination system of microsatellites. Acta Astronaut2014; 105(1): 30–39.
83.
FrankPMDingX. Survey of robust residual generation and evaluation methods in observer-based fault detection systems. J. Proc Control1997; 7(6): 403–424.
84.
GertlerJ. Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. Virginia, USA: CRC, 1998.
85.
Prud’HommeCRovasDVVeroyK, et al.Reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations: reduced-basis output bound methods. J. Fluids Eng2002; 124(1): 70–80.
86.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHAliMAM. Integrated attitude and orbit model of an earth orbiting satellite using three-axis control. In: 2015 International Conference on Space science and Communication (IconSpace). New York, NY, 10-12 August 2015.
87.
WenXJiLZhangH, et al.Fault detection and diagnosis in the INS/GPS navigation system. In: World Automation Congress (WAC). Waikoloa, HI, 03–07 August 2014.
WuYZouDLiuP, et al.Dynamic magnetometer calibration and alignment to inertial sensors by Kalman filtering. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2018; 26(2): 716–723.
90.
ParkS-TLeeJG, Improved Kalman filter design for three-dimensional radar tracking. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2001; 37(2): 727–739.
91.
PasadynAJ. Kalman filter state estimation for a manufacturing system. Santa Clara, California: Advanced Micro Devices Inc, 2004.
92.
HarveyA. (1987). Applications of the Kalman filter in econometrics. In T. Bewley (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics: Fifth World Congress (Econometric Society Monographs, pp. 285-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521344301.008.
93.
GimonetB. Signal processing: Kalman filtering, In CNES, Location and Navigation Satellite Systems. p 287-300 (SEE N90-23420 17-12), 1989.
94.
WangYPapageorgiouM. Real-time freeway traffic state estimation based on extended Kalman filter: a general approach. Transp Res B: Methodol2005; 39(2): 141–167.
95.
QiJTahaAFWangJ. Comparing Kalman filters and observers for power system dynamic state estimation with model uncertainty and malicious cyber attacks. IEEE Access2018; 6: 77155–77168.
96.
WuQSaifM. Robust fault diagnosis for a satellite large angle attitude system using an iterative neuron PID (INPID) observer. In: 2006 American Control Conference. New York, NY, 14–16 June 2006.
97.
ChenWSaifM. Observer-based fault diagnosis of satellite systems subject to time-varying thruster faults, J Dyn Sys Meas Control129(3): 352–356.
98.
GaoCZhaoQDuanG. Robust actuator fault diagnosis scheme for satellite attitude control systems. J Franklin Inst2013; 350(9): 2560–2580.
99.
GaoSZhangWHeX, et al.Sliding mode observer based satellite actuator fault diagnosis with attitude-only measurement. In: 2019 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). New York, NY, 3–5 June 2019.
100.
CarvalhoLPToriumiFYAngelicoBA, et al.Model-based fault detection filter for Markovian jump linear systems applied to a control moment gyroscope. Eur J Control2021; 59: 99–108.
101.
BarrauABonnabelS. The invariant extended Kalman filter as a stable observer. IEEE Trans Automat Contr2017; 62(4): 1797–1812.
102.
ChenXSunRJiangW, et al.A novel two-stage extended Kalman filter algorithm for reaction flywheels fault estimation. Chinese J. Aeronaut2016; 29(2): 462–469.
103.
GrewalMSAndrewsAP. Applications of Kalman filtering in aerospace 1960 to the present [historical perspectives]. IEEE Control Syst2010; 30(3): 69–78.
104.
JulierSJUhlmannJKDurrant-WhyteHF. A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems. In: American Control Conference, Proceedings of the 1995. New York, NY, 1995.
105.
TalebiS. Adaptive filtering algorithms for quaternion-valued signals. London: Imperial College London, 2016.
106.
MehrjardiMFSanusiHAliMAM, et al.Integrated attitude-orbit dynamics and control of spacecraft systems: state of the art and future trends. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag2018; 33(7): 60–71.
107.
ByeonSMokSHWooH, et al.Sensor-fault tolerant attitude determination using two-stage estimator. Advances in Space Research2019; 63(11): 3632–3645.
108.
LiZMaLKhorasaniK. A dynamic neural network-based reaction wheel fault diagnosis for satellites. In: The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings. New York, NY, 2006.
109.
PirmoradiFSassaniFDe SilvaC. Fault detection and diagnosis in a spacecraft attitude determination system. Acta Astronaut2009; 65(5–6): 710–729.
110.
DingJRecursiveLeastI. Recursive and iterative least squares parameter estimation algorithms for multiple-input–output-error systems with autoregressive noise. Circuits Syst Signal Process2018; 37(5): 1884–1906.
111.
GertlerJ. Fault detection and diagnosis. Encyclopedia of Systems and Control2015; 417–422.
112.
CimpoesuEMCiubotaruBDStefanoiuD. Fault detection and diagnosis using parameter estimation with recursive least squares. In: 2013 19th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science. New York, NY, 2013.
113.
OdendaalHMJonesT. Actuator fault detection and isolation: an optimised parity space approach. Control Eng Pract2014; 26: 222–232.
114.
JoslynC. A possibilistic approach to qualitative model-based diagnosis. Telemat Inform1994; 11(4): 365–384.
115.
LiuWChengL, Nan-HauW, et al.Quantitative and qualitative model based fault diagnosability evaluation of momentum wheel. Chinese Space Sci and Tech2011. 31(4): 54–63.
116.
SamantarayAKBouamamaBO. Model-based process supervision: a bond graph approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science and Business Media, 2008.
117.
QijiangSMinqiangXRixinW, Spacecraft fault diagnosis based on hierarchical digraphs. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, 2009. 6: 018.
118.
MesbahiMHadaeghFY. Formation flying control of multiple spacecraft via graphs, matrix inequalities, and switching. J Guid Control Dyn2001; 24(2): 369–377.
119.
LeeW-SGroshDLTillmanFA, et al.Fault tree analysis, methods, and application: a review. IEEE Trans Reliab1985; R-34(3): 194–203.
120.
LeeCAlenaRLRobinsonP. Migrating fault trees to decision trees for real time fault detection on international space station. In: Aerospace Conference, 2005. New York, NY, 2005.
121.
BaruaASinhaP, KhorasaniK, et al.A novel fault-tree approach for identifying potential causes of satellite reaction wheel failure control applications. In CCA 2005. Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference on 2005. New York, NY, 2005.
122.
YangS. Fault detection characterization, designalysis. Montrel, QC: University of Alberta, 2013.
123.
VicenteKJ. Ecological interface design: a research overview, in analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems 1995. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1995, pp. 623–628.
124.
VinhNQ. An approach to the spacecraft functional stability with changes of inertia moments. J Aerosp Sci Technol, 2015. 1: 73–77.
125.
VassevEHincheyM. Autonomy requirements engineering for space missions. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2014.
126.
PérezCGTrave-MassuyesLChantheryE, et al.Decentralized diagnosis in a spacecraft attitude determination and control system. J Phys: Conf Ser2015; 659: 012054.
127.
GuptaV. Automatic control, robotics and computer vision. Doctoral School, 2016.
128.
TalebiHAKhorasaniK. A neural network-based multiplicative actuator fault detection and isolation of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2013; 21(3): 842–851.
129.
TalebiHAKhorasaniKTafazoliS. A recurrent neural-network-based sensor and actuator fault detection and isolation for nonlinear systems with application to the satellite’s attitude control subsystem. IEEE Trans Neural Netw2009; 20(1): 45–60.
130.
SunBWangJHeZ, et al.Fault identification for a closed-loop control system based on an improved deep neural network. Sensors2019; 19(9): 2131.
131.
ChenMTaoGJiangB. Dynamic surface control using neural networks for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with input saturation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2015; 26(9): 2086–2097.
132.
TavakoliMAssadianN. Predictive fault-tolerant control of an all-thruster satellite in 6-DOF motion via neural network model updating. Advan Space Res2018; 61(6): 1588–1599.
133.
ZhaoLJiaY. Neural network-based adaptive consensus tracking control for multi-agent systems under actuator faults. Int J Syst Sci2016; 47(8): 1931–1942.
134.
MeirelesMRAlmeidaPESimõesMG. A comprehensive review for industrial applicability of artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2003; 50(3): 585–601.
135.
XiaoBYinS. An intelligent actuator fault reconstruction scheme for robotic manipulators. IEEE Trans Cybern2018; 48(2): 639–647.
136.
RanderathBGerdesMScholzD. Method and device for condition monitoring. 2016. Google patents.
137.
BingqingFShoulinH, ChaunL, et al.Anomaly detection of spacecraft attitude control system based on principal component analysis. In: Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2017 29th Chinese. New York, NY, 2017.
138.
SinghDLeavlineEJ, Model-based outlier detection system with statistical preprocessing. J Mod Appl Stat Methods, 2016; 15(1): 39.
139.
NasriOGueddi IDagueP, et al.Spacecraft actuator diagnosis with principal component analysis: application to the rendez-vous phase of the mars sample return mission. J Control Sci and Eng, 2015; 1: 2015.
140.
FuNZhangGXiaK, et al.Research on fault detection and principal component analysis for spacecraft feature extraction based on kernel methods. Open Astronomy2022; 31(1): 333–339.
GiarratanoJCRileyG. Expert systems: principles and programming. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, 1989.
143.
RotondoD. Background on fault tolerant control, in advances in gain-scheduling and fault tolerant control techniques. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018, pp. 129–145.
144.
IbrahimSKAhmedAZeidanMAE, et al.Machine learning techniques for satellite fault diagnosis. Ain Shams Engineering Journal2020; 11(1): 45–56.
145.
LiLDingSXQiuJ, et al.Fuzzy observer-based fault detection design approach for nonlinear processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2017; 47(8): 1941–1952.
146.
PrecupR-EHellendoornH. A survey on industrial applications of fuzzy control. Comput Ind2011; 62(3): 213–226.
147.
RossTJ. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
148.
LiALiuMShiY. Adaptive sliding mode attitude tracking control for flexible spacecraft systems based on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy modelling method. Acta Astronaut2020; 175: 570–581.
149.
MeiYLioYKongK, et al.Fuzzy adaptive sliding mode fault estimation and fixed-time fault-tolerant control for coupled spacecraft based on SE (3). Aerosp Sci Technol2022; 1: 107673.
150.
LiuSHeWZhuH, et al.A new fault diagnosis model of flywheel system based on belief rule base and fuzzy fault tree analysis. In: 2021 CAA symposium on fault detection, supervision, and safety for technical processes (SAFEPROCESS), Chengdu, China, 17–18 December 2021.
151.
LiuRYangBZioE, et al.Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a review. Mech Syst Signal Process2018; 108: 33–47.
152.
HauCC. Handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. World Scientific, 2015.
BaldiP. Fault detection, diagnosis and active fault tolerant control for a satellite attitude control system. Alma, 2015.
155.
WillskyAS. A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica (Oxf)1976; 12(6): 601–611.
156.
ZhangTWangFFuW. Fault Detection and isolation for redundant inertial measurement unit under quantization. Applied Sciences2018; 8(6): 865.
157.
LemmaTA. Model uncertainity, fault detection and diagnostics, in a hybrid approach for power plant fault diagnostics. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018, pp. 75–97.
158.
LaprieJ-CArlatJBeounesC, et al.Hardware-and software-fault tolerance, in ESPRIT’90. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1990, pp. 786–789.
159.
SharmaRDewanLChatterjiS. Fault diagnosis methods in dynamic systems: A review. Int J Electron Electr Eng2015; 3(6): 465–471.
160.
IsermannR. Process fault detection based on modeling and estimation methods—a survey. Automat1984; 20(4): 387–404.
161.
LalaJHAlgerLS. Hardware and software fault tolerance: a unified architectural approach. In: 1988 The eighteenth international symposium on fault-tolerant computing. Digest of papers. New York, NY, 1988.
162.
FengZLiangMChuF. Recent advances in time–frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples. Mech Syst Signal Process2013; 38(1): 165–205.
163.
LezanaPAguileraRRodríguezJ. Fault Detection on multicell converter based on output voltage frequency analysis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2009; 56(6): 2275–2283.
164.
CauffriezLGrondelSLosleverP, et al.Bond Graph modeling for fault detection and isolation of a train door mechatronic system. Control Engineering Practice2016; 49: 212–224.
165.
Murray-SmithDJ. Modelling and simulation of integrated systems in engineering: issues of methodology, quality, testing and application. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2012.
166.
BaigAARuzliRBuangAB. Reliability analysis using fault tree analysis: a review. Int J Chem Eng Appl2013. 4(3): 169.
167.
MilneR.ChandrasekaranB. Fault diagnosis and expert systems. The 6th International Workshop on Expert Systems And Their Applications1986.
168.
BisantzAMVicenteKJ. Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. Int J Hum Comput Stud1994; 40(1): 83–117.
169.
PietersmaJvan GemundAJBosA. A model-based approach to sequential fault diagnosis. In: IEEE autotestcon, 2005. NJ, USA: IEEE, 2005.
170.
Abu-HannaAJansweijerWBenjaminsR, et al.Functional models in perspective: their characteristics and integration in multiple model-based diagnosis. Appl Artif Intell1994; 8(2): 219–237.
171.
LiuZHeHAhmedQ, et al.Structural analysis based fault detection and isolation applied for a lithium-ion battery pack. IFAC-PapersOnLine2015; 48(21): 1465–1470.
172.
ThirumarimuruganMBagyalakshmiNPaarkaviP. Comparison of fault detection and isolation methods: a review. In: 2016 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO). New York, NY, 2016.
173.
BigdeliEMohammadiMRaahemiB, et al.Incremental anomaly detection using two-layer cluster-based structure. Inform Sci2018; 429: 315–331.
174.
AbidM. Fault detection in nonlinear systems: an observer-based approach 2010. Duisburg, Essen: Diss University, 2010.
175.
Al-AmeriSMKamarudinMSYousofMFM, et al.Interpretation of frequency response analysis for fault detection in power transformers. Applied Sciences2021; 11(7): 2923.
176.
DuranMJBarreroF. Recent advances in the design, modeling, and control of multiphase machines—part II. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2016; 63(1): 459–468.
177.
MerhebA-RBatemanF.NouraH. Passive and active fault tolerant control of octorotor UAV using second order sliding mode control. CCA2015; 1907–1912, doi:10.1109/CCA.2015.7320888.
178.
JainTYaméJJSauterD. Active fault-tolerant control systems. Springer, 2018.
179.
HuQXiaoBFriswellM. Robust fault-tolerant control for spacecraft attitude stabilisation subject to input saturation. IET Control Theory and Applications2011; 5(2): 271–282.
180.
ShenQWangDZhuS, et al.Finite-time fault-tolerant attitude stabilization for spacecraft with actuator saturation. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst2015; 51(3): 2390–2405.
181.
BaiLGaoZ. Integrated Fault-tolerant stabilization control for satellite attitude systems with actuator and sensor faults. J Control Autom Electr Syst2019; 30(6): 864–878.
182.
HuQFriswellMXiaoB. Fault tolerant control with H∞ performance for attitude tracking of flexible spacecraft. IET Control Theory and Applications2012; 6(10): 1388–1399.
183.
HuQLiBWangD, et al.Velocity-free fault-tolerant control allocation for flexible spacecraft with redundant thrusters. Int J Syst Sci2015; 46(6): 976–992.
184.
MirshamsMKhosrojerdiMHasaniM. Passive fault-tolerant sliding mode attitude control for flexible spacecraft with faulty thrusters. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2014; 228(12): 2343–2357.
185.
HuQ. Robust adaptive sliding-mode fault-tolerant control with L2-gain performance for flexible spacecraft using redundant reaction wheels. IET Control Theory and Applications2010; 4(6): 1055–1070.
186.
MengQZhangTSongJ. Modified model-based fault-tolerant time-varying attitude tracking control of uncertain flexible satellites. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2013; 227(11): 1827–1841.
187.
XiaoYYeDSunZ. Finite time fault-tolerant attitude control for rigid-flexible coupling satellites based on Legendre neural network. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2018; 232(15): 2845–2857.
188.
ZhouCZhouD. Robust dynamic surface sliding mode control for attitude tracking of flexible spacecraft with an extended state observer. Proc Inst Mech Eng G J Aerosp Eng2017; 231(3): 533–547.
189.
JinJKoSRyooC-K. Fault tolerant control for satellites with four reaction wheels. Control Eng Pract2008; 16(10): 1250–1258.
190.
XiaoBHuoMYangX, et al.Fault-tolerant attitude stabilization for satellites without rate sensor. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(11): 7191–7202.
191.
JiangYHuQMaG. Adaptive backstepping fault-tolerant control for flexible spacecraft with unknown bounded disturbances and actuator failures. ISA Trans2010; 49(1): 57–69.
192.
KumarKDAbreuNAbreuN, et al.Fault-tolerant attitude control of miniature satellites using reaction wheels. Acta Astronautica2018; 151: 206–216.
193.
WangXPin tanCWuFet al. Fault-tolerant attitude control for rigid spacecraft without angular velocity measurements. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics2021; 51(3): 1216–1229.
194.
HyderAKFloodJSabaripourS, et al.Spacecraft power technologies, Imperial College Press London, 2000.
BozzanoMCimattiAKatoenJP, et al.Spacecraft early design validation using formal methods. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2014; 132: 20–35.
197.
HayashiMLachterJListonD, et al.Evaluation of an advanced Fault Management system display for next generation crewed space vehicles. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Los Angeles, CA, 2006.
198.
TudoroiuNKhorasaniK. Fault detection and diagnosis for reaction wheels of satellite’s attitude control system using a bank of Kalman filters. In: International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2005. ISSCS 2005. New York, NY, 2005.
199.
LeeJParkCG. Cascade filter structure for sensor/actuator fault detection and isolation of satellite attitude control system. Int J Control Autom Syst2012; 10(3): 506–516.
200.
JiangTKhorasaniK. A fault detection, isolation and reconstruction strategy for a satellite’s attitude control subsystem with redundant reaction wheels. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Montreal, QC, 2007.
201.
WilliamsonWRSpeyerJLDangVT, et al.Fault detection and isolation for deep space satellites. J Guid Control Dyn2009; 32(5): 1570–1584.
202.
MousaviSKhorasaniK. Fault detection of reaction wheels in attitude control subsystem of formation flying satellites: a dynamic neural network-based approach. Int. J. Intell. Unmanned Syst2014; 2(1): 2–26.
203.
ChengYWangRXuM, et al.Simultaneous state and actuator fault estimation for satellite attitude control systems. Chinese J. Aeronaut2016; 29(3): 714–721.
204.
KolcioKHansonMLFesqLM, et al.Integrating autonomous fault management with conventional flight software: a case study. In: 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Proceedings. Snowmass, CO, 1999.
