Defending an interceptor with lure role scenario: A finite-time cooperative guidance method

Abstract

The problem of multi-aircraft cooperative intercepting maneuvering targets is focused in the study. To effectively save the required cost of interception, a cooperative guidance scheme with different roles is considered, and a cooperative guidance method is proposed based on H₂ norm performance index under finite-time boundedness conditions. First, a cooperative interception model is established based on the relative motion equation and first-order dynamics characteristics. Second, by considering the system state and finite-time stability characteristics of the output, sufficient conditions for the synthesis of the H₂ norm performance of the system under the finite-time bounded conditions are derived. Then, under the finite-time boundedness conditions, a cooperative guidance method with lure roles is designed based on the H₂ norm performance index synthesis method. The proposed method can ensure that the defender satisfies the output finite-time convergence characteristic with a small energy consumption. Furthermore, the intermediate state does not exceed the predetermined limit value and effectively saves the overload required for interception during the guidance process. Additionally, simulation experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords

inite-time boundedness finite-time stability finite-time convergence cooperative guidance lure role

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zong

Wang

Zheng

, et al. Finite–time H_∞ control for discrete–time switched nonlinear systems with time delay. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2015; 25(6): 914–936.

Fonod

Shima

. Estimation enhancement by cooperatively imposing relative intercept angles. J Guid Control Dynam 2017; 40(7): 1711–1725.

Balhance

Weiss

Shima

. Cooperative guidance law for intrasalvo tracking. J Guid Control Dynam 2017, article in advance, January.

Boyell

. Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 1976; 12(4): 522–526.

Boyell

. Counterweapon aiming for defense of a moving target. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 1980; 16(3): 402–408.

Dong

Wen

Xia

. Multiple-constraint cooperative guidance based on two-stage sequential convex programming. Chin J Aeronaut; 33(1): 296–307.

Ratnoo

Shima

. Line of sight guidance for defending an aircraft. In: AIAA guidance navigation and control conference. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010.

Yamasaki

Balakrishnan

. Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference. Toronto, Canada, 2010, pp. 2010–7876.

Guo

Yao

Wang

, et al. Maneuver control strategies to maximize prediction errors in ballistic middle phase. J Guid Control Dynam 2013; 35(4): 1226–1234.

10.

Guo

Wang

Yao

, et al. Evader maneuver on consideration of energy consumption in fight vehicle interception scenarios. Aero Sci Technol 2011; 15(7): 519–525.

11.

Yamasaki

Balakrishnan

Takano

. Modified CLOS intercept guidance for aircraft defense against a guided missile. In: AIAA guidance navigation and control conference. Portland, Oregon, USA, 2011.

12.

Ratnoo

Shima

. Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J Guid Control Dynam 2011; 34(2): 522–532.

13.

Guo

, et al. Triangle interception scenario: a finite-time guidance approach. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2016; 1: 1–12.

14.

Zhao

Zhou

. Distributed three-dimensional cooperative guidance via receding horizon control. Chin J Aeronaut; 29(4): 972–983.

15.

Pan

. Efficient PID tracking control of robotic manipulators driven by compliant actuators. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2018; 27(2): 915–922.

16.

Zhang

Guo

, et al. Cooperative detection based on the adaptive interacting multiple model-information filtering algorithm. Aero Sci Technol 2019; 93: 1–15.

17.

Shima

. Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. J Guid Control Dynam 2011; 34: 414–425.

18.

Song

. Three-dimensional adaptive finite-time guidance law for intercepting maneuvering targets. Chin J Aeronaut; 30(6): 1985–2003.

19.

Amato

Ariola

Dorato

. Finite–time control of linear systems subject to parametric uncertainties and disturbances. Automatica 2001; 37(9): 1459–1463.

20.

Guo

Yao

Wang

, et al. Input output finite-time stabilization of linear systems with finite time boundedness. ISA (Instrum Soc Am) Trans 2014; 53(4): 977–982.

21.

Yan

Song

Park

. Finite–time stability and stabilization for stochastic markov jump systems with mode–dependent time delays. ISA (Instrum Soc Am) Trans. 2017.

22.

Liu

Shen

Zhao

. Finite–time stabilization and boundedness of switched linear system under state–dependent switching. J Franklin Inst 2013; 350(3): 541–555.

23.

Amato

Ariola

Cosentino

. Finite-time stability of linear time-varying systems: analysis and controller design. IEEE Trans Automat Control 2010; 55(4): 1003–1008.

24.

Amato

Ariola

. Finite-time control of discrete time linear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 2005; 50(5).

25.

She

, et al. Stability analysis of discrete-time switched systems via multi-step multiple Lyapunov-like function. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 2018; 27(2): 44–61.

26.

Amato

Ambrosino

Cosentino

, et al. Finite-time stabilization of impulsive dynamical linear systems. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 2011; 5(1): 89–101.

27.

Amato

Ambrosino

Ariola

, et al. Finite–time stability of linear time–varying systems with jumps. Automatica 2009; 45(5): 1354–1358.

28.

Amato

Ambrosino

Cosentino

, et al. Input-output finite time stabilization of linear systems. Automatica 2010; 46(9): 1558–1562.

29.

Amato

Tommasi

Pironti

. Input-output finite-time stabilization of impulsive linear systems: necessary and sufficient conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems 2016; 19(2): 93–106.

30.

Guo

Deng

, et al. Finite-time stabilization of switched linear systems and its application in terminal guidance. Int J Adv Rob Syst 2016; 13(6): 1–13.

31.

Zames

. Feedback and optimal sensitivity: model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms and approximate inverses. IEEE Trans Automat Control 1981; 26(2): 301–320.

32.

Doyle

Glover

Khargonekar

, et al. State-space solutions to H2 and H∞ standard control problems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 1989; 34(8): 831–847.

33.

Khargonekar

Nagpal

Poola

. H_∞ control with transients. SIAM J Control Optim 1991; 29(6): 1373–1393.

34.

Zhou

Doyle

Glover

. Robust and optimal control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.

35.

Rotea

. The generalized H₂ control problem. Automatica 1993; 29(2): 373–385.

36.

Farges

Peaucelle

Arzelier

, et al. Robust H2 performance analysis and synthesis of linear polytopic discrete-time periodic systems via LMIs. Syst Control Lett. 2007; 56(2): 159–166.

37.

Lin

. Finite–time boundedness and L2–gain analysis for switched delay systems with norm–bounded disturbance. Appl Math Comput 2011; 217(12): 5982–5993.

38.

Pan

Guo

, et al. Output-feedback adaptive neural control of a compliant differential SMA actuator. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2017; 25(6): 2202–2210.

39.

Zhang

Guo

Wang

. Cooperative intercept guidance of multiple aircraft with a lure role included. In: International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2018.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB