Prevalence of standing plantar pressure distribution variation in north Asian Indian patients with diabetes mellitus: A study to understand ulcer formation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2013
Prevalence of standing plantar pressure distribution variation in north Asian Indian patients with diabetes mellitus: A study to understand ulcer formation
Diabetes Mellitus is a disorder of metabolism. Foot problems are common in diabetes and altered plantar pressures distribution may lead to ulceration in people with Diabetes Mellitus. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate standing plantar pressure distribution variations in north Asian Indian diabetes mellitus subjects and its association with duration of diabetes. Thirty three subjects with age range from 40 to 75 years are recruited from AIIMS Endocrinology & metabolism lab Delhi, India and divided into three groups: 11 control subjects (non-diabetic), 11 diabetic subjects without neuropathy (DNN) and 11 diabetic subjects with neuropathy (DN). Neuropathy status was assessed by measuring loss of protective sensation to 10gm Semen’s Weinstein monofilament. Plantar pressure distributions parameter-Power ratio (PR) was measured during barefoot standing using portable PedoPowerGraph and results are analyzed using one way analysis of variance to detect significant difference between the groups. We found significant (p<0.05; p<0.01) difference in PR value between DN and CG groups in fore foot and hind foot but no significant (p>0.05) difference in PR value was found between DNN and CG groups in the foot. As compared to DNN, DN group have maximum PR variations in the fore foot. Plantar pressure distribution parameter-PR was higher with longer duration of diabetes among type 2 diabetes subjects. In this study we conclude that plantar pressure distribution parameter-PR was able to distinguish the DN groups from the CG group in hind and fore foot during standing. Increased forefoot PR value is prevalent in the diabetic neuropathic subjects and may be responsible for the occurrence of foot sole ulcers but additional prospective studies are needed. In the future we will investigate the plantar pressure distribution parameter-PR variations in diabetes with obese and osteoarthritis subject.
SeeCKAcharyaURKuanyiZ. Automated identification of diabetes type 2 subjects with and without neuropathy using eigenvalues. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine224: 43–52.
CavanaghPRSimoneauGGUlbrechtJS. Ulceration, unsteadiness and uncertainty: the biomechanical consequences of diabetes mellitus. J Biomech1993; 26: S23–S40.
4.
MuellerJMMinorSDSahrmannSA. Differences in the gait characteristics of patients with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy compared with age-matched controls. Phys Ther1994; 74: 299–308.
5.
KwonO-YMinorSDMalufK. Comparison of muscle activity during walking in subjects with and without diabetic neuropathy. Gait Posture2003; 18: 105–113.
6.
ShawJEVan ShieCHMCarringtonAL. An analysis of dynamic forces transmitted through the foot in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care1998; 21: 1955–1959.
7.
MalufKSMuellerMJStrubeMJ. Tendon Achilles lengthening for treatment of neuropathic ulcers causes a temporary reduction in forefoot pressure associated with changes in plantar flexor power rather than ankle motion during gait. J Biomech2004; 37: 897–906.
8.
MassonEAHayEMStockleyI. Abnormal foot pressures alone may not cause ulceration. Diabet Med1989; 6: 426–428.
9.
FernandoDJSMassonEAVevesA. Relationship of limited joint mobility to abnormal foot pressures and diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care1991; 14: 8–11.
10.
PayneCTurnerDMillerK. Determinants of plantar pressure in the diabetic foot. J Diabetes Complications2002; 16: 277–283.
11.
BusSAMaasMDe LangeA. Elevated plantar pressures in neuropathic diabetic patients with claw/hammer toe deformity. J Biomech2005; 38: 1918–1925.
12.
PecoraroREReiberGEBurgessEM. Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabetes Care1990; 13: 513–521.
13.
BeltsRPFranksCIDuckworthT. Analysis of pressures and loads under the foot. Part I. Quantitation of the dynamic distribution. Clin Phys Physiol M1980; 2: 102–112.
WeltonEA. The Harris and Beath footprint: interpretation and clinical value. Foot Ankle1992; 13: 462–468.
16.
HughesJKrissSKlenermanL. A clinician’s view of foot pressure: a comparison of three different techniques. Foot Ankle1987; 7: 277–284.
17.
FrykbergRGLaveryLAPhamH. Role of neuropathy and high foot pressures in diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care1998; 21: 1714–1719.
18.
VevesAMurrayHJYoungMJ. The risk of foot ulceration in diabetic patients with high foot pressure—a prospective study. Diabetologia1992; 35: 660–663.
19.
StessRMJensenSRMirmiranR. The role of dynamic plantar pressures in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care1997; 20: 855–858.
20.
CavanaghPRUlbrechtJSCaputoGN. Biomechanics of the foot in diabetes mellitus. In: LevinMEO’NealLWBowkerJH (eds) The diabetic foot. 5th ed.St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 1993, pp.199–232.
21.
CavanaghPRRodgersMMLiboshiA. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle1997; 7: 262–276.
22.
GefenA. Plantar soft tissue loading under the medial metatarsals in the standing diabetic foot. Med Eng Phy2003; 25: 491–499.
23.
HessertMJVyasMLeachJ. Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and old adults. BMC Geriatr2005; 5: 8.
24.
RaiDVAggarwalLMBahadurR. Plantar pressure changes in normal and pathological foot during bipedal standing. Indian J Orthop2006; 40: 119–122.
25.
UccioliLCaselliAGiacomozziC. Pattern of abnormal tangential forces in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)2001; 16: 445–446.
26.
AbouaeshaFVan SchieCHMArmstrongDG. Plantar soft-tissue thickness predicts high peak plantar pressure in the diabetic foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc2004; 94: 39–42.
27.
PatakyZAssalJPConneP. Plantar pressure distribution in Type 2 diabetic patients without peripheral neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Diabet Med2005; 22: 762–767.
28.
RahmanMAAzizZAcharyaUR. Analysis of plantar pressure in diabetic type 2 subjects with and without neuropathy. ITBM-RBM2006; 27: 46–55.
29.
PatilSLThatteMAChaskarUM. Development of planter foot pressure distribution system using flexi force sensors. Sens Transducer J2009; 108: 73–79.
30.
LordM. Spatial resolution in plantar pressure measurement. Med Eng Phys1997; 19: 140–144.
31.
PrabhuKGPatilKMSrinivasanS. A new method of analysis of standing foot pressure images for detection of plantar ulcers in early-stage diabetic neuropathy. Front Med Biol Eng2001; 11: 31–43.
32.
ThomasJVPatilKMRadhakrishnanS. The role of skin hardness, thickness, and sensory loss on standing foot power in the development of plantar ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus—a preliminary study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds2003; 2: 132–139.
33.
CharanyaGPatilKMNarayanamurthyVB. Effect of foot sole hardness, thickness and footwear on foot pressure distribution parameters in diabetic neuropathy. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2004; 218: 431–443.
34.
DonovanJLDequanZMuellerMJ. Pressure gradient and subsurface shear stress on the neuropathic forefoot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)2008; 23: 342–348.
35.
GiacomozziCSawachaZUccioliL. The role of shear stress in the aetiology of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. J Foot Ankle Res2008; 1: O3.
36.
SawachaZCristoferiGGabriellaG. Characterizing multisegment foot kinematics during gait in diabetic foot patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil2009; 6: 37.
37.
LeardiniABenedettiMGCataniF. An anatomically based protocol for the description of foot segment kinematics during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)1999; 14: 528–536.
38.
JenkynTR. Motion of the ankle complex and forefoot twist during walking and medial direction changes (abstract). Gait Posture2002; 16: 11.
39.
CappozzoACataniFDella CroceU. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)1995; 10: 171–178.
40.
BenedettiMGCataniFLeardiniA. Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)1998; 13: 204–215.
41.
DiamondJEMuellerMJDelittoA. Reliability of a diabetic foot evaluation. Phys Ther1989; 69: 797–802.
42.
WeinsteinS. Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein enhanced sensory test. J Hand Ther1993; 6: 11–28.
43.
NarayanamurthyVBPoddarRPeriyasamyR. Surveillance and early detection of altered biomechanical parameters help keeping reconstructed ulcer healed. Eur J Plast Surg2009; 32: 131–140.
44.
PatilKMBhatiaVMNarayanmurthyVB. New on-line methods for analysis of walking foot pressures in diabetic neuropathy. Front Med Biol Eng1999; 9: 49–62.
45.
CavanaghPRMoragEBoultonAJM. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech1997; 30: 243–250.
BacarinTAAkashiPMHSaccoICN. Duration of disease, neuropathic symptoms and plantar sensitivity in patients with diabetes with and without previous plantar ulceration. Wounds2008; 20: 37–45.
48.
TaylorAMenzHBKeenanA-M. Effects of experimentally induced plantar insensitivity on forces and pressures under the foot during normal walking. Gait Posture2004; 20: 232–237.
49.
BacarinTASaccoICNHennigEM. Plantar pressure distribution patterns during gait in diabetic neuropathy patients with a history of foot ulcers. Clinics2009; 64: 113–120.
50.
ViswanathanVSnehalathaCSivagamiM. Association of limited joint mobility and high plantar pressure in diabetic foot ulceration in Asian Indians. Diabetes Res Clin Pract2003; 60: 57–61.
