A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing

Abstract

Finite element models of orthopedic implants such as hip resurfacing femoral components usually rely on contact elements to model the load-bearing interfaces that connect bone, cement and implant. However, contact elements cannot simulate progressive degradation of bone–cement interfaces or osseointegration. A new interface element is developed to alleviate these shortcomings. This element is capable of simulating the nonlinear progression of bone–cement interface debonding or bone–implant interface osseointegration, based on mechanical stimuli in normal and tangential directions. The new element is applied to a hip resurfacing femoral component with a stem made of a novel biomimetic composite material. Three load cases are applied sequentially to simulate the 6-month period required for osseointegration of the stem. The effect of interdigitation depth of the bone–cement interface is found to be negligible, with only minor variations of micromotions. Numerical results show that the biomimetic stem progressively osseointegrates (α averages 0.7 on the stem surface, with spot-welds) and that bone–stem micromotions decrease below 10 µm. Osseointegration also changes the load path within the femoral bone: a decrease of 300 µε was observed in the femoral head, and the inferomedial part of the femoral neck showed a slight increase of 165 µε. There was also increased stress in the implant stem (from 7 to 11 MPa after osseointegration), indicating that part of the load is supported through the stem. The use of the new osseointegratable interface element has shown the osseointegration potential of the biomimetic stem. Its ability to model partially osseointegrated interfaces based on the mechanical conditions at the interface means that the new element could be used to study load transfer and osseointegration patterns on other models of uncemented hip resurfacing femoral components.

Keywords

Bone–implant interface bone–cement interface hip resurfacing prosthesis biomimetic composite material finite element analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mandell

Carter

Goodman

. A conical-collared intramedullary stem can improve stress transfer and limit micromotions. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 695–703.

Goetzen

Lampe

Nassut

. Load-shift – numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses. J Biomech 2005; 38: 595–604.

Taylor

. Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220(2): 289–297.

Ong

Kurtz

Manley

. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(8): 1110–1115.

Pal

Gupta

New

. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2009; 223(4): 471–484.

Dammak

Shirazi-Adl

Zukor

. Analysis of cementless implants using interface nonlinear friction – experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech 1997; 30(2): 121–129.

Bragdon

Burke

Lowenstein

. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(8): 945–951.

Soballe

Hansen

B.-Rasmussen

. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992; 10(2): 285–299.

Kienapfel

Sprey

Wilke

. Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14(3): 355–368.

10.

Janssen

Mann

Verdonschot

. Finite element simulation of cement-bone interface micromechanics: a comparison to experimental results. J Orthop Res 2009; 27(10): 1312–1318.

11.

Miller

Eberhardt

Cleary

. Micromechanics of postmortem-retrieved cement-bone interfaces. J Orthop Res 2010; 28(2): 170–177.

12.

Bitsch

Jager

Lurssen

. Influence of bone density on the cement fixation of femoral hip resurfacing components. J Orthop Res 2010; 28(2): 986–991.

13.

Mann

Mocarski

Damron

. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface. J Orthop Res 2001; 19(6): 1153–1161.

14.

Pérez

Nuño

Madrala

. Computational modelling of bone cement polymerization: temperature and residual stresses. Comput Biol Med 2009; 39(9): 751–759.

15.

Lilikakis

Vowler

Villar

. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36(2): 215–222.

16.

Gross

Liu

. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with an uncemented femoral component. A seven-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 2008; 90(Suppl. 3): 32–37.

17.

Katrana

Crawford

Vowler

. Femoral neck resorption after hip resurfacing arthroplasty – a comparison of cemented and uncemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(Suppl. 2): 234.

18.

Beazley

Parsons

. Narrowing of the femoral neck after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison of cemented and uncemented femoral components. Hip Int 2010; 20(4): 542–546.

19.

Waal Malefijt

Huiskes

. A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993; 112(5): 220–225.

20.

Fernandes

Folgado

Jacobs

. A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. J Biomech 2002; 35(2): 167–176.

21.

Xiangyi

Niebur

. Bone ingrowth into a porous coated implant predicted by a mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm. Biomech Model Mechanbiol 2008; 7(4): 335–344.

22.

Swider

Ambard

. A predictive mechano-biological model of the bone-implant healing. Eur J Mech A-Solid 2006; 25(6): 927–937.

23.

Dickinson

Taylor

Browne

. Implant-bone interface healing and adaptation in resurfacing hip replacement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2011; 15(9): 935–947.

24.

Moreo

Perez

Garcia-Aznar

. Modelling the mixed-mode failure of cement-bone interfaces. Eng Fract Mech 2006; 73(10): 1379–1395.

25.

Moreo

Perez

Garcia-Aznar

. Modelling the mechanical behaviour of living bony interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2007; 196(35–36): 3300–3314.

26.

Caouette

Bureau

Vendittoli

. Anisotropic bone remodeling of a biomimetic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34: 559–565.

27.

Alfano

Crisfield

. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2001; 50(7): 1701–1736.

28.

Crisfield

Davies

GAO

. Progressive delamination using interface elements. J Compos Mater 1998; 32(14): 1246–1272.

29.

Qiu

Crisfield

Alfano

. An interface element formulation for the simulation of delamination with buckling. Eng Fract Mech 2001; 68(16): 1755–1776.

30.

Mann

Werner

Ayers

. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension. J Biomech 1999; 32(11): 1251–1254.

31.

Rho

Hobatho

Ashman

. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 1995; 17(5): 347–355.

32.

Hobatho

. Bone and joints modelling with individualized geometric and mechanical properties derived from medical images. CMES-Comp Model Eng 2003; 4(3–4): 489–496.

33.

Yang

J-M

C-S

Hsu

Y-G

. Mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement containing PMMA-SiO₂ hybrid sol-gel material. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38(2): 143–154.

34.

Bergmann

Deuretzbacher

Heller

. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 859–871.

35.

Heller

Bergmann

Deuretzbacher

. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 883–893.

36.

Morlock

Schneider

Bluhm

. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 2001; 34(7): 873–881.

37.

Kassi

J-P

Heller

Stoeckle

. Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. J Biomech 2005; 38(5): 1143–1154.

38.

Pal

Gupta

New

AMR

. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2009; 13(2): 143–155.

39.

Beaulé

Matar

Poitras

. 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(1): 84–93.

40.

Pérez

García

Doblaré

. Analysis of the debonding of the stem-cement interface in intramedullary fixation using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach. Eng Fract Mech 2005; 72(8): 1125–1147.

41.

Song

Beaupré

Goodman

. Osseointegration of total hip arthroplasties: studies in humans and animals. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 1999; 9(1–2): 77–112.

42.

Moskal

Jordan

Brown

. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: 11- to 13-year results. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(7): 837–844.

43.

Race

Mann

Edidin

. Mechanics of bone/PMMA composite structures: an in vitro study of human vertebrae. J Biomech 2007; 40(5): 1002–1010.