In vitro investigation of friction at the interface between bone and a surgical instrument

Abstract

This study investigated the friction between surgical instruments and bone to aid improvements to instrument design. The bases of orthopaedic surgical instruments are usually made of metal, especially stainless steel. Silicone elastomer was chosen as an alternate biocompatible material, which would be compliant on the bone surface when used as the base of an instrument. The coefficient of static friction was calculated at the bone/material interface in the presence of a synthetic solution that had a comparable viscosity to that of blood, to assess the friction provided by each base material. Three types of silicone elastomers with different hardnesses (Shore A hardness 23, 50 and 77) and three distinct stainless steel surfaces (obtained by spark erosion, sand blasting and surface grinding) were used to assess the friction provided by the materials on slippery bone. The bone specimens were taken from the flattest region of the femoral shaft of a bovine femur; the outer surfaces of the specimens were kept intact. In general, the stainless steel surfaces exhibited higher values of coefficient of static friction, compared to the silicone elastomer samples. The stainless steel surface finished by spark erosion (surface roughness R_a = 8.9 ± 1.6 µm) had the highest coefficient value of 0.74 ± 0.04. The coefficient values for the silicone elastomer sample with the highest hardness (Dow Corning Silastic Q7-4780, Shore A hardness 77) was not significantly different to values provided by the stainless steel surface finished by sand blasting (surface roughness R_a = 2.2 ± 0.1 µm) or surface grinding (surface roughness R_a = 0.1 ± 0.0 µm). Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that silicone could be a potentially useful material for the design of bases of orthopaedic instruments that interface with bone.

Keywords

Bone friction coefficient silicone stainless steel surgical instrument

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Canale

. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, 2002.

Rancourt

Shirazi-Adl

Drouin

. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1990; 24: 1503–1519.

Dammak

Shirazi-Adl

Schwartz

. Friction properties at the bone-metal interface: comparison of four different porous metal surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 35: 329–336.

Davim

Marques

. Dynamical experimental study of friction and wear behaviour of bovine cancellous bone sliding against a metallic counterface in a water lubricated environment. J Mater Process Tech 2004; 152: 389–394.

Korvick

Newbrey

Bagby

. Stress shielding reduced by a silicon plate-bone interface: a canine experiment. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 611–616.

Colas

Curtis

. Medical applications of silicones. In: Ratner

Hoffman

Schoen

. (eds) An introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, pp.697–707.

Massey

. Silicone. In: The effects of sterilization methods on plastics and elastomers. 2nd ed. New York: William Andrews, 2005, p.265.

Mahomed

Hukins

DWL

Kukureka

. Viscoelastic properties of Silastic medical grade silicones: implications for finger joint replacement. J Polym Mater 2009; 26: 389–399.

Brookshier

Tarbell

. Evaluation of a transparent blood analog fluid: aqueous xanthan gum/glycerine. Biorheology 1993; 30: 107–116.

10.

Pohl

Wendt

Werner

. In vitro testing of artificial heart valves: comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Artif Organs 1996; 20: 37–46.

11.

Banerjee

Ashtekar

Helmy

. Hemodynamic diagnostics of epicardial coronary stenosis: in-vitro experimental and computational study. Biomed Eng Online 2008; 7: 24.

12.

ASTM G115. Standard guide for measuring and reporting friction coefficients. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, 2004.

13.

Ludema

. Friction. In: Bhushan

(ed.) Modern tribology handbook, vol. 1, ch. 5. London: CRC Press, 2001, pp.205–230.

14.

Bland

. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

15.

Hill

. Design process and factors. In: Hill

(ed.) Design engineering of biomaterials for medical device, ch. 15. Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, pp.241–266.