Sliding of the load carrier in third-generation intramedullary nails for proximal femur fractures: An in vitro mechanical comparison study

Abstract

Dynamic osteosynthesis of proximal femur fractures facilitates compression at the fracture site through distal glide of the femoral head load carrier in the intramedullary nail. Modern implants are currently designed according to diverse gliding principles. The aim of this study was to compare the sliding mechanisms of different types of nails. As in other similar mechanical studies the load patterns occurring around the femoral head load carrier and the intramedullary nail under full load were simulated for three different types of intramedullary nail - PFNA, Targon PFT and Trigen Intertan. The load necessary to trigger distal displacement of the femoral head implant in the nail was determined. The lengths of the load carriers were varied. For the three lengths of load carrier, mechanical testing showed that the Targon PFT started to slide at a significantly lower load compared to the other two implants. Comparison of the PFNA and Trigen Intertan in terms of load to dynamization for 77 mm carriers revealed a significantly lower load for the PFNA. Slide efficacy for the PFNA and the Trigen Intertan was found to improve as the length of the blade/screw was shortened. The dynamization properties of the Targon PFT with its cylindrical sliding mechanism, similar to the DHS, were far better compared to the PFNA and the Trigen Intertan that have more complex sliding actions. Since theoretical considerations indicate that a less efficient gliding action leads to a higher complication rate, implants of the next generation should be optimized in this regard.

Keywords

Biomechanics proximal femur fracture intramedullary nails cut out

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Hirschmuller

. Intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: central or caudal positioning of the load carrier? A biomechanical comparative study on cadaver bones. Injury 2013; 44: 784–790.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Blanke

. Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 2701–2716.

Davis

Sher

Horsman

. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 26–31.

Halder

. The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 340–344.

Radford

Needoff

Webb

. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 789–793.

Heyse-Moore

MacEachern

Evans

. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A comparison of the Richards screw-plate with the Jewett nail-plate. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983; 65: 262–267.

Mainds

Newman

. Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with a sliding screw device. Injury 1989; 20: 98–100.

Loch

Kyle

Bechtold

. Forces required to initiate sliding in second-generation intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1626–1631.

Hohendorff

Meyer

Menezes

. Treatment results and complications after PFN osteosynthesis. Unfallchirurg 2005; 108: 938, 940, 941–946 passim.

10.

Bergmann

Deuretzbacher

Heller

. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34: 859–871.

11.

Jacobs

McClain

Armstrong

. Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 146: 62–70.

12.

Frei

Hotz

Cadosch

. Central head perforation, or “cut through,” caused by the helical blade of the proximal femoral nail antirotation. J Orthop Trauma 2012; 26: e102–e107.

13.

Parker

Handoll

. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 3: CD000093.

14.

Konstantinidis

Papaioannou

Mehlhorn

. Salvage procedures for trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure: biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylar screw. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2011; 225: 710–717.

15.

Mehlhorn

Strohm

Muller

. The reversed locked internal plate fixator as an alternative internal fixation of problematic proximal femur fractures. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147: 561–566.