This article reports on the use of the binder jetting three-dimensional printing process combined with sintering to process bioceramic materials to form micro- and macroporous three-dimensional structures. Three different glass-ceramic formulations, apatite–wollastonite and two silicate-based glasses, have been processed using this route to create porous structures which have Young’s modulus equivalent to cortical bone and average bending strengths in the range 24–36 MPa. It is demonstrated that a range of macroporous geometries can be created with accuracies of ±0.25 mm over length scales up to 40 mm. Hot-stage microscopy is a valuable tool in the definition of processing parameters for the sintering step of the process. Overall, it is concluded that binder jetting followed by sintering offers a versatile process for the manufacture of load-bearing bioceramic components for bone replacement applications.
SachsECimaMWilliamsP. Three dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model. J Eng Ind: T ASME1992; 114(4): 481–488.
2.
SachsEAllenSGuoH. Progress on tooling by 3D printing; conformal cooling, dimensional control, surface finish and hardness. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Held in Austin, Texas on August 11– 13, Proceedings (8th) – 1, pp. 115–123, (1997).
3.
BoseSVahabzadehSBandyopadhyayA.Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today2013; 16(12): 496–504.
4.
LeukersBGülkanHIrsenSH. Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2005; 16(12): 1121–1124.
5.
SeitzHRiederWIrsenS. Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B2005; 74(2): 782–788.
6.
WarnkePHSeitzHWarnkeF. Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigations. J Biomed Mater Res B2010; 93(1): 212–217.
7.
SantosCFLSilvaAPLopesL. Design and production of sintered β-tricalcium phosphate 3D scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C2012; 32(5): 1293–1298.
8.
BergmannCLindnerMZhangW. 3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc2010; 30(12): 2563–2567.
9.
SuwanprateebJSanngamRSuvannaprukW. Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2009; 20(6): 1281–1289.
10.
HabibovicPGbureckUDoillonCJ. Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants. Biomaterials2008; 29(7): 944–953.
11.
KlammertUGbureckUVorndranE. 3D powder printed calcium phosphate implants for reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects. J Cranio Maxill Surg2010; 38(8): 565–570.
12.
KhalyfaAVogtSWeisserJ. Development of a new calcium phosphate powder-binder system for the 3D printing of patient specific implants. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2007; 18(5): 909–916.
13.
MancusoE.Processing and characterisation of novel bioceramics for load bearing applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University, 2016.
14.
AlharbiNA.Indirect three dimensional printing of apatite-wollastonite structures for biomedical applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University, 2015.
15.
XiaoKDalgarnoKWWoodDJ. Indirect selective laser sintering of apatite-wollostonite glass-ceramic. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2008; 222(7): 1107–1114.
16.
UtelaBStortiDAndersonR. A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP). J Manuf Process2008; 10(2): 96–104.
17.
UtelaBRStortiDAndersonRL. Development process for custom three-dimensional printing (3DP) material systems. J Manuf Sci E: T ASME2010; 132(1): 0110081–0110089.
18.
BretcanuOChatzistavrouXParaskevopoulosK. Sintering and crystallisation of 45S5 Bioglass® powder. J Eur Ceram Soc2009; 29(16): 3299–3306.
19.
GoldsteinSA.The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J Biomech1987; 20(11–12): 1055–1061.
20.
KeavenyTMHayesWC. Mechanical properties of cortical and trabecular bone. In: HallBK (ed.) Bone a treatise, volume 7: bone growth. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993, pp.285–344.
21.
RhoJ-YKuhn-SpearingLZiouposP.Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys1998; 20(2): 92–102.
22.
LeeJAKnightCAKunX. In vivo biocompatibility of custom-fabricated apatite-wollastonite-mesenchymal stromal cell constructs. J Biomed Mater Res A2015; 103(10): 3188–3200.
23.
DysonJAGeneverPGDalgarnoKW. Development of custom-built bone scaffolds using mesenchymal stem cells and apatite-wollastonite glass-ceramics. Tissue Eng2007; 13(12): 2891–2901.
24.
OhsawaKNeoMOkamotoT. In vivo absorption of porous apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2004; 15(8): 859–864.
25.
ButscherABohnerMRothC. Printability of calcium phosphate powders for three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. Acta Biomater2012; 8(1): 373–385.
26.
CoxSCThornbyJAGibbonsGJ. 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2015; 47: 237–247.
27.
TadicDEppleM.A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. Biomaterials2004; 25(6): 987–994.
