Scaling effects in spiral capsule robots

Abstract

Spiral capsule robots can be applied to human gastrointestinal tracts and blood vessels. Because of significant variations in the sizes of the inner diameters of the intestines as well as blood vessels, this research has been unable to meet the requirements for medical applications. By applying the fluid dynamic equations, using the computational fluid dynamics method, to a robot axial length ranging from 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻² m, the operational performance indicators (axial driving force, load torque, and maximum fluid pressure on the pipe wall) of the spiral capsule robot and the fluid turbulent intensity around the robot spiral surfaces was numerically calculated in a straight rigid pipe filled with fluid. The reasonableness and validity of the calculation method adopted in this study were verified by the consistency of the calculated values by the computational fluid dynamics method and the experimental values from a relevant literature. The results show that the greater the fluid turbulent intensity, the greater the impact of the fluid turbulence on the driving performance of the spiral capsule robot and the higher the energy consumption of the robot. For the same level of size of the robot, the axial driving force, the load torque, and the maximum fluid pressure on the pipe wall of the outer spiral robot were larger than those of the inner spiral robot. For different requirements of the operating environment, we can choose a certain kind of spiral capsule robot. This study provides a theoretical foundation for spiral capsule robots.

Keywords

Capsule robots spiral scaling effects computational fluid dynamics turbulent intensity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Meron

. The development of the swallowable video-capsule (M2A). Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52(6): 812–819.

Uehara

Hoshina

. Capsule endoscope Norika system. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2003; 12(5): 227–234.

Park

Nam

Song

. Design of bi-directional and multi-channel miniaturized telemetry module for wireless endoscopy. In: Proceedings of the 2nd annual international IEEE-EMB special topic conference on microtechnologies in medicine & biology, Madison, WI, 2–4 May 2002, pp.273–276. New York: IEEE.

Maqbool

Parkman

Friedenberg

. Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54(10): 2167–2174.

Liao

Jin

. Mapping of gastrointestinal remote capsule endoscopy. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2015.

Gao

Yan

. Locomotion analysis of an inchworm-like capsule robot in the intestinal tract. IEEE T Biomed Eng 2016; 63(2): 300–310.

Zhang

Tan

. Experimental Investigation of the intestine’s friction characteristic based on ‘internal force-static friction’ capsubot. In: Proceedings of the IASTED international conference biomedical engineering, Innsbruck, Austria, 16–18 February 2011, pp.117–123. New York: IEEE.

Munoz

Alici

. A magnetically actuated drug delivery system for robotic endoscopic capsules. J Med Dev Trans ASME 2016; 10(1): 011004 (11 pp.).

Park

Prak

. A paddling based locomotive mechanism for capsule endoscopes. J Mech Sci Tech 2006; 20(7): 1012–1018.

10.

Woo

Kim

Mohy-Ud-Din

. Small intestinal model for electrically propelled capsule endoscopy. Biomed Eng Online 2011; 10(1): 1–20.

11.

Yim

Sitti

. Shape-programmable soft capsule robots for semi-implantable drug delivery. IEEE T Robot 2012; 28(5): 1198–1202.

12.

Simi

Valdastri

Quaglia

. Design, fabrication and testing of a capsule with hybrid locomotion for gastrointestinal tract exploration. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2010; 15(2): 170–180.

13.

Sendoh

Ishiyama

. Fabrication of magnetic actuator for use in a capsule endoscope. IEEE T Magn 2003; 39(5): 3232–3234.

14.

Lee

Kim

Hong

. A flexible chain-based screw propeller for capsule endoscopes. Int J Precis Eng Man 2009; 10(4): 27–34.

15.

Ikeuchi

Yoshinaka

Tomita

. Low invasive propulsion of medical devices by traction using mucus. Wear 1997; 209: 179–183.

16.

Zhou

Quan

Yoshinaka

. A new medical microrobot for minimal invasive surgery. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2001; 215(2): 215–220.

17.

Zhang

Jiang

Zhang

. A variable-diameter capsule robot based on multiple wedge effects. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2011; 16(2): 241–254.

18.

Mahoney

Abbott

. Generating rotating magnetic fields with a single permanent magnet for propulsion of untethered magnetic devices in a lumen. IEEE T Robot 2014; 30(2): 411–420.

19.

Liang

Peng

Chen

. Performance analysis and parameter optimization of an inner spiral in-pipe robot. Robotica 2016; 34(2): 361–382.

20.

Shimoyama

. Scaling in microrobots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Pittsburgh, PA, 5–9 August 1995, pp.208–211. New York: IEEE.

21.

Mei

Kong

Zhang

. Mechanical properties and scaling effects in micro-electro-mechanical systems. J Mech Strength 2001; 23(4): 373–379.

22.

Wang

. Computational fluid dynamics analysis-CFD software theory and application. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2004.

23.

Ikeuchi

Yoshinaka

Hashimoto

. Locomotion of medical micro robot with spiral ribs using mucus. In: Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on micro machine and human science, Nagoya, Japan, 2–4 October 1996, pp.217–222. New York: IEEE.