Arash: A social robot buddy to support children with cancer in a hospital environment

Abstract

This article presents the thorough design procedure, specifications, and performance of a mobile social robot friend Arash for educational and therapeutic involvement of children with cancer based on their interests and needs. Our research focuses on employing Arash in a pediatric hospital environment to entertain, assist, and educate children with cancer who suffer from physical pain caused by both the disease and its treatment process. Since cancer treatment causes emotional distress, which can reduce the efficiency of medications, using social robots to interact with children with cancer in a hospital environment could decrease this distress, thereby improving the effectiveness of their treatment. Arash is a 15 degree-of-freedom low-cost humanoid mobile robot buddy, carefully designed with appropriate measures and developed to interact with children ages 5–12 years old. The robot has five physical subsystems: the head, arms, torso, waist, and mobile-platform. The robot’s final appearance is a significant novel concept; since it was selected based on a survey taken from 50 children with chronic diseases at three pediatric hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Founded on these measures and desires, Arash was designed, built, improved, and enhanced to operate successfully in pediatric cancer hospitals. Two experiments were devised to evaluate the children’s level of acceptance and involvement with the robot, assess their feelings about it, and measure how much the robot was similar to the favored conceptual sketch. Both experiments were conducted in the form of storytelling and appearance/performance evaluations. The obtained results confirm high engagement and interest of pediatric cancer patients with the constructed robot.

Keywords

Children with cancer robot design humanoid robot social robot storytelling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Siegel

Miller

Jemal

. Cancer statistics, 2018. Cancer J Clin2018; 68(1): 7–30.

Carlson

Angen

Cullum

et al . High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer2004; 90(12): 2297–2304.

Alemi

Ghanbarzadeh

Meghdari

et al . Clinical application of a humanoid robot in pediatric cancer interventions. Int J Soc Robot2016; 8(5): 743–759.

Alemi

Meghdari

Ghanbarzadeh

et al . Impact of a social humanoid robot as a therapy assistant in children cancer treatment. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 27 October 2014, pp.11–22. Cham: Springer. Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Meghdari

Alemi

Khamooshi

et al . Conceptual design of a social robot for pediatric hospitals. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on robotics and mechatronics, Tehran, Iran, 26–28 October 2016, pp.566–571. New York: IEEE.

Meghdari

Shouraki

Siamy

et al . The real-time facial imitation by a social humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on robotics and mechatronics, Tehran, Iran, 26–28 October 2016, pp.524–529. New York: IEEE.

Meghdari

Alemi

Pour

et al . Spontaneous human-robot emotional interaction through facial expressions. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 7 October 2016, pp.351–361. Cham: Springer. Kansas City, MO, USA.

Zakipour

Meghdari

Alemi

. RASA: a low-cost upper-torso social robot acting as a sign language teaching assistant. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 7 October 2016, pp.630–639. Cham: Springer. Kansas City, MO, USA.

Elahi

Korayem

Shariati

et al . “Xylotism”: a tablet-based application to teach music to children with autism. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 24 October 2017, pp.728–738. Cham.: Springer. Tsukuba, Japan.

10.

Alemi

Meghdari

Ghazisaedy

. Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. Int J Hum Robot2014; 11(03): 1450022.

11.

Taheri

Alemi

Meghdari

et al . Social robots as assistants for autism therapy in Iran: research in progress. In: Proceedings of the 2nd RSI/ISM international conference on robotics and mechatronics, Tehran, Iran, 15–17 October 2014, pp.760–766. New York: IEEE.

12.

Taheri

Alemi

Meghdari

et al . Clinical application of humanoid robots in playing imitation games for autistic children in Iran. Procd Soc Behv2015; 176: 898–906.

13.

Van den Heuvel

Lexis

de Witte

. Can the IROMEC robot support play in children with severe physical disabilities? A pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res2017; 40(1): 53–59.

14.

Georgia Institute of Technology. Socially intelligent machines lab: Simon the robot, http://www.cc.gatech.edu/social-machines/projects.html (accessed 30 March 2015).

15.

Pioggia

Sica

Ferro

et al . Human-robot interaction in autism:FACE,an android-based social therapy. In: Proceedings of the 16th international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Jeju, South Korea, 26–29 August 2007, pp.605–612. New York: IEEE

16.

Quigley

Conley

Gerkey

et al . ROS: an open-source robot operating system. ICRA Workshop Open Source Softw2009; 3(3.2): 5.

17.

Striepe

Lugrin

. There once was a robot storyteller: measuring the effects of emotion and non-verbal behavior. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 24 October 2017, pp.126–136. Cham: Springer. Tsukuba, Japan.

18.

U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board). Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines for buildings and facilities. Fed Regist1991; 56: 173.

19.

Lafaye

Collette

Wieber

. Model predictive control for tilt recovery of an omnidirectional wheeled humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the international conference on robotics and automation, Seattle, WA, 26–30 May 2015, pp.5134–5139. New York: IEEE.

20.

Argentieri

Danès

Souères

. A survey on sound source localization in robotics: from binaural to array processing methods. Comput Speech Lang2015; 34(1): 87–112.

21.

Saffari

Meghdari

Vazirnezhad

et al . Ava (a social robot): design and performance of a robotic hearing apparatus. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social robotics, 28 October 2015, pp.440–450. Cham: Springer. Paris, France

22.

Parisi

Camoes

Scarpiniti

et al . Cepstrum prefiltering for binaural source localization in reverberant environments. IEEE Signal Proc Let2012; 19(2): 99–102.

23.

KUTE, http://thednp.github.io/kute.js/

24.

Bartneck

Kulić

Croft

et al . Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot2009; 1(1): 71–81.

25.

Appel

Gnambs

Richter

et al . The Transportation Scale—Short Form (TS-SF). Media Psychol2015; 18(2): 243–266.

26.

Green

Brock

. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol2000; 79(5): 701–721.

27.

Bradley

Lang

. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psy1994; 25(1): 49–59.

28.

Read

MacFarlane

Casey

. Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’s fun. In: Interaction design and children, vol. 2. Eindhoven: Shaker Publishing, 2002, pp.1–23.

29.

Taheri

Meghdari

Alemi

et al . Clinical interventions of social humanoid robots in the treatment of a pair of high- and low-functioning autistic Iranian twins. Sci Iran Trans B. Epub ahead of print 30August2017. DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4337.

30.

Taheri

Meghdari

Alemi

et al . Teaching music to children with autism: a social robotics challenge. Sci Iran Trans G. Epub ahead of print 5December2017. DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4608.