Computed tomography (CT) images are commonly used to diagnose liver disease. It is sometimes very difficult to comment on the type, category and level of the tumor, even for experienced radiologists, directly from the CT image, due to the varying intensities. In recent years, it has been important to design and develop computer-assisted imaging techniques to help doctors/physicians improve their diagnosis. The proposed work is to detect the presence of a tumor region in the liver and classify the different stages of the tumor from CT images. CT images of the liver have been classified between normal and tumor classes. In addition, CT images of the tumor have been classified between Hepato Cellular Carcinoma (HCC) and Metastases (MET). The performance of six different classifiers was evaluated on different parameters. The accuracy achieved for different classifiers varies between 98.39% and 100% for tumor identification and between 76.38% and 87.01% for tumor classification. To further, improve performance, a multi-level ensemble model is developed to detect a tumor (liver cancer) and to classify between HCC and MET using features extracted from CT images. The k-fold cross-validation (CV) is also used to justify the robustness of the classifiers. Compared to the individual classifier, the multi-level ensemble model achieved high accuracy in both the detection and classification of different tumors. This study demonstrates automated tumor characterization based on liver CT images and will assist the radiologist in detecting and classifying different types of tumors at a very early stage.
HsuWTYehJRChangYC, et al. A computer aided for image processing of computed tomography in hepatocellular carcinoma. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine workshops, BIBMW 2011, Atlanta, GA, 12–15 November 2011, pp.942–944. New York: IEEE.
2.
SeletchiEDDuliuOG.Image processing and data analysis in computed tomography. Rom J Phys2007; 52: 667–675.
3.
ChenELChungPCChenCL, et al. An automatic diagnostic system for CT liver image classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1998; 45(6): 783–794.
4.
GletsosMMougiakakouSGMatsopoulosGK, et al. Classification of hepatic lesions from CT images using texture features and neural networks. In: 2001 conference proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–28 October 2001, pp.2748–2751. New York: IEEE.
5.
ValavanisIKMougiakakouSGNikitaA, et al. Evaluation of texture features in hepatic tissue characterization from non-enhanced CT images. In: Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology - proceedings, Lyon, France, 2007. pp.3741–3744. New York: IEEE.
6.
YeJSunYWangS, et al. Multi-phase CT image based hepatic lesion diagnosis by SVM. In: 2009 2nd international conference on biomedical engineering and informatics, Tianjin, China, 17 October 2009, pp.1–5. New York: IEEE.
7.
ZhangXFurukawaTZhouX, et al. Detection of metastatic liver tumor in multi-phase CT images by using a spherical gray-level differentiation searching filter. In: Medical imaging 2011: Computer-aided diagnosis, Lake Buena Vista, FL, 25 April 2011, p.79632K. Bellingham, Washington USA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
8.
GunasundariSAnanthiMS.Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver tumor classification from CT datasets. Int J Comput Appl2012; 39(18): 46–51.
9.
UmamaheshwariJRadhamaniG.Quadratic program optimization using support vector machine for CT brain image classification. Int J Comput Sci Issues2012; 9(4): 305–310.
10.
KhachaneM.Fuzzy based CT scan brain image classification. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol2015; 4: 71–74.
11.
AlahmerHAhmedA.Computer-aided classification of liver lesions from CT images based on multiple ROI. Procedia Comput Sci2016; 90: 80–86.
12.
RajathiGIJijiGW.Chronic liver disease classification using hybrid whale optimization with simulated annealing and ensemble classifier. Symmetry (Basel)2019; 11(1): 33.
13.
ÖzyurtFTuncerTAvciE, et al. A novel liver image classification method using perceptual hash-based convolutional neural network. Arab J Sci Eng2019; 44(4): 3173–3182.
14.
StoitsisJValavanisIMougiakakouSG, et al. Computer aided diagnosis based on medical image processing and artificial intelligence methods. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A2006; 569(2): 591–595.
15.
ZhangXFujitaHQinT, et al. CAD on liver using CT and MRI. In: International conference on medical imaging and informatics, Beijing, China, 14 August 2007, pp.367-76. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
16.
KayaaltiÖAksebzeciBHKarahanIÖ, et al. Staging of the liver fibrosis from CT images using texture features. In: 2012 7th international symposium on health informatics and bioinformatics, HIBIT 2012, Nevsehir, Turkey, 19–22 April 2012, pp. 47–52. New York: IEEE.
17.
PuniaRSinghS.Automatic detection of liver in CT images using optimal feature based neural network. Int J Comput Appl2013; 76(15): 53–60.
18.
BhuvaneswariCArunaPLoganathanD.Classification of lung diseases by image processing techniques using computed tomography images. Int J Adv Comput Res2014; 4(14): 87–93.
19.
VeeramuthuAMeenakshiS.An efficient approach for medical image classification using association rules. Int J Comput Appl2014; 90(3): 1–6.
20.
VeeramuthuAMeenakshiSTejaswiYD.An efficient and fast brain CT image classification using hybrid technique. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci2015; 10(5): 2004–2010.
21.
Leena NangaiV. Automatic brain tumor medical image classification using hyperbolic Hopfield neural network. J Chem Pharm Res2015; 7(2): 190–199.
22.
AliAHHadiEMMazhirSN.Diagnosis of liver tumor from CT images using unsupervised classification with geometrical and statistical features. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng2015; 5(3): 28–35.
23.
AnthimopoulosMChristodoulidisSEbnerL, et al. Lung pattern classification for interstitial lung diseases using a deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2016; 35(5): 1207–1216.
24.
BogomasovKHimmelspachLKlassenG, et al. Feature-based approach for severity scoring of lung tuberculosis from CT images. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Avignon, France, 10–14 September 2018, pp. 2125–2135. Avignon: CEUR.
25.
RajendranPMadheswaranM.Hybrid medical image classification using association rule mining with decision tree algorithm. J Comput2010; 2(1): 2151–9617. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.3503.pdf
26.
PadmaA.Automatic classification and segmentation of brain tumor in CT images using optimal dominant gray level run length texture features. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl2011; 2(10): 53–59. www.ijacsa.thesai.org
27.
BhatnagarDTiwariAKVijayarajanV, et al. Classification of normal and abnormal images of lung cancer. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2017; 263: 042100.
28.
Al-AmeenZSulongGJoharMG.Employing a suitable contrast enhancement technique as a pre-restoration adjustment phase for computed tomography medibcal images. Int J Bio Sci Bio Technol2013; 5(1): 73–80.
29.
Al-AmeenZSulongGJoharMGM. Enhancing the contrast of CT medical images by employing a novel image size dependent normalization technique. Int J Bio Sci Bio Technol2012; 4(3): 63–68.
30.
RadhakrishnanMKuttiannanT.Comparative analysis of feature extraction methods for the classification of prostate cancer from TRUS medical images. Int J Comput Sci Issues2012; 9(1): 171–179.
31.
NiuLQianMYangW, et al. Surface roughness detection of arteries via texture analysis of ultrasound images for early diagnosis of atherosclerosis. PLoS One2013; 8(10): e76880.
32.
MaterkaAStrzeleckiM.Texture analysis methods – a review. Vol. COST B11. Technical University of Lodz, Institute of Electronics, 1998.
33.
GuanXLiangJQianY, et al. A multi-view OVA model based on decision tree for multi-classification tasks. Knowl Based Syst2017; 138: 208–219.
34.
SchapireRE.Explaining adaboost. In: Empirical inference: Festschrift in Honor of Vladimir N. Vapnik.Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, pp.37–52.
35.
LiawAWienerM.Classification and regression by random forest. R News2002; 2(3): 18–22.
36.
GnanasekarPNagappanA.Investigation on feature extraction and classification of medical images. World Acad Sci Eng Technol2011; 60(12): 327–332. http://waset.org/journals/waset/v60/v60-64.pdf
37.
RekikIAllassonnièreSCarpenterTK, et al. Medical image analysis methods in MR/CT-imaged acute-subacute ischemic stroke lesion: segmentation, prediction and insights into dynamic evolution simulation models. A critical appraisal. NeuroImage Clin2012; 1(1): 164–178.
