This paper presents an original rehabilitative robotic walking simulation device. As a novel feature, it can duplicate the walking motion of the feet completely by including the motion of the metatarsophalangeal joints as well. It is also adjustable to different foot sizes and gait parameters such as speed, step length, and foot elevation. The presented device comprises two identical mechanisms that simulate the right and left feet. Each mechanism is designed as a planar parallel manipulator with three degrees of freedom and thus its platform (i.e. foot plate) can duplicate the sagittal-plane motion of a foot completely. A prototype of the device is already built, patented, and tested by several people, two of whom are physiotherapists. In the paper, the inverse and forward kinematic analyses of each parallel manipulator are also presented. The inverse kinematic analysis is carried out based on a typical gait cycle data of a healthy person gathered from the related literature. The results of the inverse kinematic analysis are then used as reference trajectory data in testing the device with different healthy people at different speeds.
EsquenaziATalatyMJayaramanA. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PM R2017; 9(1): 46–62.
VaughanCLDavisBO’ConnorJ. Dynamics of Human Gait. 2nd ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Kiboho Publishers, 1999.
4.
CalabroRSCacciolaABerteF, et al. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now?Neurol Sci2016; 37(4): 503–514.
5.
SchmidtHSorowkaDHesseS, et al. Design of a robotic walking simulator for neurological rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEWRSJ intielligent conference on intelligent robots and systems EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 30 September–4 October 2002, pp.1487–1492. New York: IEEE.
6.
RostonGPPeurachT. A whole body kinesthetic display device for virtual reality applications. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM, 25 April 1997, pp.3006–3011. New York: IEEE.
7.
HesseS. Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation2007; 22: 1–11.
8.
TaoWLiuTZhengR, et al. Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors2012; 12: 2255–2283.
9.
ChenBMaHQinLY, et al. Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons. J Orthop Transl2016; 5: 26–37.
10.
EsquenaziATalatyM. Robotics for lower limb rehabilitation. PM R2019; 30: 385–397.
11.
MohanSMohantaJKKurtenbachS, et al. Development and control of a 2PRP-2PPR planar parallel manipulator for lower limb rehabilitation therapies. Mech Mach Theory2017; 2: 272–294.
12.
ChenBZiBZengY, et al. Ankle-foot orthoses for rehabilitation and reducing metabolic cost of walking: possibilities and challenges. Mechatronics2018; 53: 241–250.
13.
RuthenbergBJWasylewskiNABeardJE. An experimental device for investigating the force and power requirements of a powered gait orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev1997; 34(2): 07487711.
14.
ColomboGWirzMDietzV. Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord2001; 39: 252–255.
15.
ColomboGJoergMSchreierR, et al. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev2000; 37(6): 693–700.
16.
RabischongESgarbiFRabischongP, et al. Control and command of a six degrees of freedom active electrical orthosis for paraplegic patient. In: IEEE international workshop on intelligent robots and systems lROS ‘90, Ibaraki, Japan, 3–6 July 1990, pp.987–991. New York: IEEE.
17.
ZhangCLanBMatsuuraD, et al. Kinematic design of a footplate drive mechanism using a 3-DOF parallel mechanism for walking rehabilitation device. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2018; 12(1): JAMDSM0017.
18.
FreivogelSMehrholzJHusak-SotomayoriT, et al. Gait training with the newly developed ‘LokoHelp’-system is feasible for non-ambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study. Brain Injury2008; 22(7–8): 625–632.
19.
SchmidtHWernerCBernhardtR, et al. Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil2007; 4: 2.
20.
SalePFranceschiniMWaldnerA, et al. Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2012; 48: 111–121.
21.
ChenW-PTangF-TJuC-W. Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gait: a 3-D finite element analysis. Clin Biomech2001; 16(7): 614–620.
22.
MacWilliamsBACowleyMNicholsonDE. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture2003; 17: 214–224.
23.
LeardiniABenedettiMGBertiL, et al. Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot during the stance phase of gait. Gait Posture2007; 25: 453–462.
24.
SimonJDoederleinLMcIntoshAS, et al. The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. Gait Posture2006; 23: 411–424.
25.
ZhengRLiuTInoueY, et al. Kinetics analysis of ankle, knee and hip joints using a wearable sensor system. J. Biomech Sci Eng2008; 3: 343–355.
26.
LarocheDPozzoTOrnettiP, et al. Effects of loss of metatarsophalangeal joint mobility on gait in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatolgy2006; 45: 435–440.
27.
KoseKC. Design and construction of a foot motion based robotic gait trainning device. PhD Thesis, Dumlupinar University, Kutahya, 2018. (in Turkish)
28.
WinterD. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Inc., 2009, pp.75–78.
29.
RoseJGambleJG. Human walking. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006.
30.
SousaASSilvaATavaresJM. Interlimb relation during the double-support phase of gait: an electromyographic, mechanical and energy-based analysis. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2013; 227(3): 327–333.
31.
GeyerHSeyfarthABlickhanR. Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running. Proc R Soc B2006; 273: 2861–2867.
32.
TakeuchiNIzumiS-I. Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Res Treat2013; 2013: 128641.
33.
YoonJParkHSDamianoDL. A novel walking speed estimation scheme and its application to treadmill control forgait rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil2012; 9: 62.
34.
LauenrothASchulzeSIoannidisA, et al. Effect of an age simulation suit on younger adults’ gait performance compared to older adults’ normal gait. Res Gerontol Nurs2017; 10(5): 227–233.
35.
OzgorenMK. Kinematic and kinetostatic analysis of parallel manipulators with emphasis on position, motion, and actuation singularities. Robotica2019; 37(4): 599–625.
