It has been hypothesized that the biodynamic responses of the human finger tissues to vibration are among the major stimuli that cause vibration health effects. Furthermore, the finger contact pressure can alter these effects. It is difficult to test these hypotheses using human subjects or existing animal models. The objective of this study was to develop a new rat-tail vibration model to investigate the combined effects of vibration and contact pressure and to identify their relationships with the biodynamic responses. Physically, the new exposure system was developed by adding a loading device to an existing rat-tail model. An analytical model of the rat-tail exposure system was proposed and used to formulate the methods for quantifying the biodynamic responses. A series of tests with six tails dissected from rat cadavers were conducted to test and evaluate the new model. The experimental and modeling results demonstrate that the new model behaves as predicted. Unlike the previous model, the vibration strain and stress of the rat tail does not depend primarily on the vibration response of the tail itself but on that of the loading device. This makes it possible to quantify and control the biodynamic responses conveniently and reliably by measuring the loading device response. This study also identified the basic characteristics of the tail biodynamic responses in the exposure system, which can be used to help design the experiments for studying vibration biological effects.
GriffinMJ. Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic Press, 1990, p.988.
2.
PelmearPLWassermanDE. Hand-arm vibration: a comprehensive guide for occupational health professionals. 2nd ed. Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press, 1998.
3.
ANSI. ANSI S2.70: guide for the measurement and evaluation of human exposure to vibration transmitted to the hand (Revision of ANSI S3.34-1986). New York, NY: American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 2006.
4.
ISO 5349-1. Mechanical vibration—measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration—part 1: general requirements. Report no. ISO 5349-1:2001, 2001. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
5.
AdewusiSARakhejaSMarcotteP, et al. Vibration transmissibility characteristics of the human hand-arm system under different postures, hand forces and excitation levels. J Sound Vib2010; 329: 2953–2971.
6.
KihlbergS. Biodynamic response of the hand-arm system to vibration from an impact hammer and a grinder. Int J Ind Ergon1995; 16: 1–8.
7.
PyykköIFärkkiläMToivanenJ, et al. Transmission of vibration in the hand-arm system with special reference to changes in compression force and acceleration. Scand J Work Environ Health1976; 2: 87–95.
8.
DongJHDongRGRakhejaS, et al. A method for analyzing absorbed power distribution in the hand and arm substructures when operating vibrating tools. J Sound Vib2008; 311: 1286–1304.
9.
YeJ. Structural and stress analysis: theories, tutorials and examples. 2nd ed. New York, NY: CRC Press, 2015.
10.
SchijveJ. Fatigue of structures and materials. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
11.
TaberLA. Biomechanics of growth, remodeling and morphogenesis. Appl Mech Rev1995; 48: 487–545.
12.
DongRGWuJZXuXS, et al. A review of hand-arm vibration studies conducted by US NIOSH since 2000. Vibration2021; 4: 482–528.
13.
LidströmIM. Vibration injury in rock drillers, chiselers, and grinders. Some views on the relationship between the quantity of energy absorbed and the risk of occurrence of vibration injury. In: Proceedings of the international conference on hand-arm vibration, pp.77–83. NIOSH-publication 1977, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
14.
DongRGSchopperAWMcDowellTW, et al. Vibration energy absorption (VEA) in human fingers-hand-arm system. Med Eng Phys2004; 26: 483–492.
15.
WuJZKrajnakKWelcomeDE, et al. Analysis of the dynamic strains in a fingertip exposed to vibration: correlation to the mechanical stimuli on mechanoreceptors. J Biomech2006; 39: 2445–2456.
16.
WuJZDongRGRakhejaS, et al. A structural fingertip model for simulating the biomechanics of tactile sensation. Med Eng Phys2004; 26: 165–175.
17.
WuJZKrajnakKWelcomeD, et al. Analysis of the biodynamic interaction between the fingertip and probe in the vibrotactile tests: the influences of the probe/fingertip contact orientation and static indentation. J Biomech2009; 42: 116–124.
18.
KrajnakKRileyDAWuJ, et al. Frequency-dependent effects of vibration on physiological systems: experiments with animals and other human surrogates. Ind Health2012; 50: 343–353.
19.
KrajnakKMillerGRWaughS, et al. Characterization of frequency-dependent responses of the sensorineural system to repetitive vibration. J Occup Environ Med2012; 54: 1010–1016.
20.
KrajnakKWaughSMillerGR, et al. Vascular responses to vibration are frequency dependent. Indian J Occup Environ Med2010; 52: 584–594.
21.
LoffredoMAYanJGKaoD, et al. Persistent reduction of conduction velocity and myelinated axon damage in vibrated rat tail nerves. Muscle Nerve2009; 39: 770–775.
22.
CurryBDGovindarajuSRBainJL, et al. Evidence for frequency-dependent arterial damage in vibrated rat tails. Anat Rec A Discon Mol Cell Evol Biol2005; 284: 511–521.
23.
WelcomeDEKrajnakKKashonML, et al. An investigation on the biodynamic foundation of a rat tail vibration model. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2008; 222: 1127–1141.
24.
KrajnakKMillerGRWaughS. Contact area affects frequency-dependent responses to vibration in the peripheral vascular and sensorineural systems. J Toxicol Environ Health, A2018; 81: 6–19.
25.
DongRGWarrenCWuJZ, et al. Development of a novel rat tail model for studying human finger vibration health effects. In: The 15th international conference on hand-arm vibration, Nancy, France, 6–9 June 2023.
26.
GallagherSSSchallMCJr. Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: evidence, implications and research needs. Ergonomics2017; 60: 255–269.
27.
DongRGWelcomeDEMcDowellTW, et al. Frequency weighting derived from power absorption of fingers-hand-arm system under zh-axis vibration. J Biomech2006; 39: 2311–2324.
28.
DongRGWuJZWelcomeDE, et al. Estimation of vibration power absorption density in human fingers. J Biomech Eng2005; 127: 849–856.
29.
DongRGWelcomeDEMcDowellTW, et al. Theoretical foundation, methods, and criteria for calibrating human vibration models using frequency response functions. J Sound Vib2015; 356: 195–216.
30.
HarrisCM. Shock and vibration handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
31.
GriffinMJMacfarlaneCRNormanCD. The transmission of vibration to the hand and the influence of gloves. In: BrammerAJTaylorW (eds) Vibration effects on the hand and arm in industry. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1982, pp.103–116.
32.
WelcomeDEDongRGXuXS, et al. The effects of vibration-reducing gloves on finger vibration. Int J Ind Ergon2014; 44: 45–59.
33.
XuXSWelcomeDEWarrenC, et al. An evaluation of experimental methods for measuring the vibration transmissibility of vibration-reducing gloves at or on the fingers. In: The 14th international conference on hand-arm-vibration, Bonn, Germany, 2019.
34.
DongRGWelcomeDEWuJZ. Estimation of biodynamic forces distributed on the fingers and the palm exposed to vibration. Ind Health2005; 43: 485–494.
35.
KrajnakKWWarrenCXuXS, et al. Effects of applied pressure on sensorineural and peripheral vascular function in an animal model of hand-arm vibration syndrome. In: The 15th international conference on hand-arm vibration, Nancy, France, 6–9 June 2023.
36.
WuJDongRGSmutzWP. Characterization of nonlinear and time-dependent behavior of skin under compression. In: VossoughiJ (ed.) Biomedical engineering recent developments. Washington, DC: Medical and Engineering Publishers, Inc., 2002, pp.187–188.
