A stroke is a neurological disease that primarily causes paralysis. Besides paraplegia, all other types of paralysis affect the upper extremity. Advanced technologies, such as wearable devices and rehabilitation regimens, are also being developed to enhance the functional ability of a stroke person to grasp and release daily living objects. In this research, we developed a rehabilitation functional assist device combining a flexion and extension mechanism with suction cup technology (hybrid technology) to help post-stroke patients improve their hand grip strength in day-to-day grasping activities. Ten poststroke hemiplegia patients were studied to test the functional ability of the impaired hand by wearing and not wearing the device. The outcomes were validated by three standard clinical tests, such as the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – Hand Functional Test (TRI-HFT), the Chedoke Arm Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-9), and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) with overall score improvements of 14.5 ± 3.8–25 ± 2.2 (p = 0.005), 5.4 ± 2.8–10 ± 1.6 (p = 0.008), and 9.6 ± 2.6–17 ± 2.4 (p = 0.005) respectively. The p-value for each of the three evaluations was less than 0.05, indicating significantly improved results and the average feedback score of the participants was 3.8 out of 5. The proposed device significantly increased impaired hand functionality in post-stroke patients. The subjects could complete some of the grasping tasks that they could not grasp without the device.
Clinical trial registration
The Clinical Trial Registry of India approved the work CTRI/2022/02/040495 described in this manuscript.
BenjaminEJBlahaMJChiuveSE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation2017; 135: e146–e603.
2.
FeiginVLBraininMNorrvingB, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 18–29.
3.
VergaraMSancho-BruJLGracia-IbáñezV, et al. An introductory study of common grasps used by adults during performance of activities of daily living. J Hand Ther2014; 27: 225–234.
4.
BullockIMZhengJZde La RosaS, et al. Grasp frequency and usage in daily household and machine shop tasks. IEEE Trans Haptics2013; 6: 296–308.
5.
NanayakkaraVKCotugnoGVitzilaiosN, et al. The role of morphology of the thumb in anthropomorphic grasping: a review. Front Mech Eng2017; 3: 5.
6.
BroeksJGLankhorstGJRumpingK, et al. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil1999; 21: 357–364.
KwakkelGKollenBJWagenaarRC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy1999; 85: 377–391.
9.
BützerTLambercyOArataJ, et al. Fully wearable actuated soft exoskeleton for grasping assistance in everyday activities. Soft Robot2021; 8: 128–143.
10.
MarconiDBaldoniAMcKinneyZ, et al. A novel hand exoskeleton with series elastic actuation for modulated torque transfer. Mechatronics2019; 61: 69–82.
11.
YooHJLeeSKimJ, et al. Development of 3D-printed myoelectric hand orthosis for patients with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil2019; 16: 1–14.
12.
WangDMengQMengQ, et al. Design and development of a portable exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2018; 26: 2376–2386.
13.
ThielbarKOTriandafilouKMFischerHC, et al. Benefits of using a voice and EMG-driven actuated glove to support occupational therapy for stroke survivors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2017; 25: 297–306.
14.
PolygerinosPWangZGallowayKC, et al. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Rob Auton Syst2015; 73: 135–143.
15.
InHKangBBSinMK, et al. Exo-glove: a wearable robot for the hand with a soft tendon routing system. IEEE Robot Autom Mag2015; 22: 97–105.
16.
WestlingGJohanssonRS. Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res1984; 53: 277–284.
17.
EdinBBWestlingGJohanssonRS. Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. J Physiol1992; 450: 547.
18.
AdamsMJJohnsonSALefèvreP, et al. Finger pad friction and its role in grip and touch. J R Soc Interface2013: 10(80): 20120467.
19.
WalankarPPVermaCVMehtaA. Study of hand grip strength in Indian population. Int J Health Sci Res2016; 6: 162–166.
20.
JeongSTranPDesaiJP. Integration of self-sealing suction cups on the FLEXotendon glove-II robotic exoskeleton system. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2020; 5: 867–874.
21.
MatheusKDollarAM. Benchmarking grasping and manipulation: properties of the objects of daily living. In: IEEE/RSJ 2010 international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2010 – conference proceedings, Taipei, Taiwan, 2010, pp. 5020–5027.
22.
RoldãoEPascoalAG. Grasps in daily tasks. IJRDO J Health Sci Nurs2021; 6: 1–7.
23.
StuartHSWangSCutkoskyMR. Tunable contact conditions and grasp hydrodynamics using gentle finger-tip suction. IEEE Trans Robot2019; 35: 295–306.
24.
HasegawaSWadaKNiitaniY, et al. A three-fingered hand with a suction gripping system for picking various objects in cluttered narrow space. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems, British Columbia, Canada, 2017, pp. 1164–1171.
25.
TiwariAPerssonBNJ. Physics of suction cups. Soft Matter2019; 15: 9482–9499.
26.
TsukagoshiHOsadaY. Soft hybrid suction cup capable of sticking to various objects and environments. Actuators2021; 10: 50.
27.
KimJNakajimaYKobayashiK. A suction-fixing, stiffness-tunable liver manipulator for laparoscopic surgeries. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2018; 23: 262–273.
28.
JangNIhnYSJeongJ, et al. A miniature suction-gripper with passive and active microneedle arrays to manipulate peripheral nerves. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Robotics and Automation, Quebec, Canada, 2019, pp. 9202–9208.
29.
AnsariNNNaghdiSMashayekhiM, et al. Intra-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) in the assessment of upper-limb muscle spasticity. NeuroRehabilitation2012; 31: 215–222.
30.
YurkewichAKozakIJHebertD, et al. Hand Extension Robot Orthosis (HERO) Grip Glove: enabling independence amongst persons with severe hand impairments after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil2020; 17: 1–17.
31.
YurkewichAKozakIJIvanovicA, et al. Myoelectric untethered robotic glove enhances hand function and performance on daily living tasks after stroke. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng2020; 7: 2055668320964050.
32.
KapadiaNZivanovicVVerrierM, et al. Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil2012; 18: 167–186.
33.
RowlandTTurpinMGustafssonL, et al. Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory-9 (CAHAI-9): perceived clinical utility within 14 days of stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil2011; 18: 382–393.
34.
RechKDSalazarAPMarcheseRR, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment scores are related with kinematic measures in people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29(1): 104463.
35.
LeeS-HJungB-KParkSY. Korean translation and psychometric properties of quebec user evaluation of satisfaction assistive technology 2.0. J Korea Acad Ind Cooperation Soc2013; 14: 3284–3292.
36.
DemersLWeiss-LambrouRSkaB. The quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disability2002; 14: 101–105.
37.
RoseCGO’MalleyMK. Hybrid rigid-soft hand exoskeleton to assist functional dexterity. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2019; 4: 73–80.
38.
SoekadarSRWitkowskiMGómezC, et al. Hybrid EEG/EOG-based brain/neural hand exoskeleton restores fully independent daily living activities after quadriplegia. Sci Robot2016; 1(1): eaag3296.
39.
RadderBPrange-LasonderGBKottinkAIR, et al. The effect of a wearable soft-robotic glove on motor function and functional performance of older adults. Assistive Technol2020; 32: 9–15.
40.
ChengNPhuaKSLaiHS, et al. Brain-computer interface-based soft robotic glove rehabilitation for stroke. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2020; 67: 3339–3351.
41.
LiMHeBLiangZ, et al. An attention-controlled hand exoskeleton for the rehabilitation of finger extension and flexion using a rigid-soft combined mechanism. Front Neurorobot2019; 13: 34.
42.
AubinPMSallumHWalshC, et al. A pediatric robotic thumb exoskeleton for at-home rehabilitation: the Isolated Orthosis for Thumb Actuation (IOTA). Int J Intell Comput Cybern2014; 7: 233–252.
43.
IqbalJKhanHTsagarakisNG, et al. A novel exoskeleton robotic system for hand rehabilitation – conceptualization to prototyping. Biocybern Biomed Eng2014; 34: 79–89.
44.
AtesSHaarmanCJWStienenAHA. SCRIPT passive orthosis: design of interactive hand and wrist exoskeleton for rehabilitation at home after stroke. Auton Robot2017; 41: 711–723.
