Analytical vibro-acoustic model of laminated spherical shell is developed in order to study the vibrational characteristics of human eyeball considering intraocular pressure (IOP) effect. Eyeball layers are assumed to be viscoelastic with frequency- and IOP-dependent properties, filled with compressible inviscid internal fluid. Love’s first approximation theory, along with the method of stress function, is used to formulate the governing equations of motion for a laminated spherical shell. The wave equation models the internal acoustic domain, and fluid–solid interaction is accounted for by enforcing velocity and stress continuity condition at the interface. The coupled system frequency equations are derived using the modal expansion method in conjunction with the orthogonality property of mode shapes. The analytical results are validated with the available literature and compared with the finite element simulations. The effects of different parameters including elastic modulus, eyeball thickness and radius, IOP variation, and frequency- and pressure-dependent properties on natural frequencies and damping characteristics are studied. It is observed that multi-layer modelling reduces natural frequencies slightly, whereas incorporating frequency- and IOP-dependent viscoelastic properties significantly increase them, demonstrating the critical importance of viscoelastic modelling for accurate eyeball biomechanics.
KrausH. Thin elastic shells: an introduction to the theoretical foundations and the analysis of their static and dynamic behavior. John Wiley & Sons, 1967.
2.
LeissaAW. Vibration of shells. NASA SP-288. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
3.
EnginAELiuYK. Axisymmetric response of a fluid-filled spherical shell in free vibrations. J Biomech1970; 3(1):11–16.
4.
ChenWQDingHJ. Natural frequencies of a fluid-filled anisotropic spherical shell. J Acoust Soc Am1999; 105(1): 174–182.
5.
HuJQiuZSuTC. Axisymmetric vibrations of a viscous-fluid-filled piezoelectric spherical shell and the associated radiation of sound. J Sound Vib2011; 330(24): 5982–6005.
6.
GhaheriAAhmadianMTFallahF. Free vibration analysis of a fluid-filled functionally graded spherical shell subjected to internal pressure. Acta Mech2022; 233(8): 3095–3112.
7.
CoquartLDepeursingeCCurnierA, et al. A fluid–structure interaction problem in biomechanics: prestressed vibrations of the eye by the finite element method. J Biomech1992; 25(10): 1105–1118.
8.
AloyMAAdsuaraJECerdá-DuránP, et al. Estimation of the mechanical properties of the eye through the study of its vibrational modes. PLoS One2017; 12(9): e0183892.
9.
PiacsekAAAbdul-WahidSTaylorR. Resonance frequencies of a spherical aluminum shell subject to static internal pressure. J Acoust Soc Am2012; 131(6): EL506–EL512.
10.
KuoKAHuntHEMListerJR. Small oscillations of a pressurized, elastic, spherical shell: model and experiments. J Sound Vib2015; 359: 168–178.
11.
EslaminejadAZiejewskiMKaramiG. Vibrational properties of a hemispherical shell with its inner fluid pressure: an inverse method for noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring. J Vib Acoust2019; 141(4): 041002.
12.
AtchisonD. Optics of the human eye. CRC Press, 2023.
13.
WeinrebRNAungTMedeirosFA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA2014; 311(18): 1901–1911.
14.
GoldmannHSchmidtTH. Über applanationstonometry. Ophthalmologica1957; 134(4): 221–242.
15.
GrolmanB. A new tonometer system. Optom Vis Sci1972; 49(8): 646–660.
16.
ForbesMPicoGGrolmanB. A noncontact applanation tonometer: description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol1974; 91(2): 134–140.
17.
HamelinkJMCloudGL. Ocular tonometry through sonic excitation and laser Doppler velocimetry. J Biomech Eng1979; 101(4): 267–270.
18.
AlamSKRichardsDWParkerKJ. Detection of intraocular pressure change in a human eye model using sonoelastic Doppler ultrasound. In: IEEE ultrasonics symposium proceedings, Tucson, AZ, USA, 20–23 October 1992, pp.1057–1060. New York: IEEE.
19.
AlamSKRichardsDWParkerKJ. Detection of intraocular pressure change in the eye using sonoelastic Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol1994; 20(8): 751–758.
20.
DrescherJStorkWHeyS, et al. Noncontact tonometry using laser interferometry. In: Medical applications of lasers in dermatology, cardiology, ophthalmology, and dentistry II, Stockholm, Sweden, 11–12 September 1998, Vol. 3564, pp. 122–131, Proceedings of SPIE. DOI: 10.1117/12.339145.
21.
GundlachARawerRHeyS, et al. Design and realization of a handheld vibrometer system for noncontact in-vivo detection of microvibrations of the human eye to determine the intraocular pressure (IOP). In: Ophthalmic technologies XII, 13 June 2002, Vol. 4611, pp. 9–19. Proceedings of SPIE. DOI: 10.1117/12.470585.
22.
DuboisPZemmouriJRoulandJF, et al. A new method for intra ocular pressure in vivo measurement: first clinical trials. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2007; 2007: 5762–5765.
23.
Von FreybergASorgMFuhrmannM, et al. Acoustic tonometry: feasibility study of a new principle of intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma2009; 18(4): 316–320.
24.
SalimiSParkSSFreiheitT. Dynamic response of intraocular pressure and biomechanical effects of the eye considering fluid–structure interaction. J Biomech Eng2011; 133: 091009.
25.
ShihPJCaoHJHuangCJ, et al. A corneal elastic dynamic model derived from Scheimpflug imaging technology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt2015; 35(6): 663–672.
26.
ShihPJGuoYR. Resonance frequency of fluid-filled and prestressed spherical shell – a model of the human eyeball. J Acoust Soc Am2016; 139(4): 1784–1792.
27.
OsmersJSorgMFischerA. Optical measurement of the corneal oscillation for the determination of the intraocular pressure. Biomed Tech2019; 64(4): 471–480.
28.
KimDChungYYeonY, et al. A pilot study for intraocular pressure measurements based on vibroacoustic parameters. Sci Rep2021; 11(1): 1–10.
29.
ShihPJWuSJSungYH, et al. Eye orbit effects on eyeball resonant frequencies and acoustic tonometer measurements. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 1–10.
30.
WooSYKobayashiASSchlegelWA, et al. Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res1972; 14(1): 29–39.
31.
GraebelWP and Van Alphen GWHM. The elasticity of sclera and choroid of the human eye, and its implications on scleral rigidity and accommodation. J Biomech Eng1977; 99(4): 203–208.
32.
FribergTRLaceJW. A comparison of the elastic properties of human choroid and sclera. Exp Eye Res1988; 47(3): 429–436.
33.
WollensakGSpoerlE. Collagen crosslinking of human and porcine sclera. J Cataract Refract Surg2004; 30(3): 689–695.
34.
EilaghiAFlanaganJGTertineggI, et al. Biaxial mechanical testing of human sclera. J Biomech2010; 43(9): 1696–1701.
35.
ElsheikhAGeraghtyBAlhassoD, et al. Regional variation in the biomechanical properties of the human sclera. Exp Eye Res2010; 90(5): 624–633.
36.
FranzeKFranckeMGünterK, et al. Spatial mapping of the mechanical properties of the living retina using scanning force microscopy. Soft Matter2011; 7(7): 3147–3154.
37.
ChenKRowleyAPWeilandJD, et al. Elastic properties of human posterior eye. J Biomed Mater Res A2014; 102(6): 2001–2007.
38.
ChenKWeilandJD. Discovery of retinal elastin and its possible role in age-related macular degeneration. Ann Biomed Eng2014; 42(3): 678–684.
39.
PalkoJRPanXLiuJ. Dynamic testing of regional viscoelastic behavior of canine sclera. Exp Eye Res2011; 93(6): 825–832.
40.
PalkoJRIwabeSPanX, et al. Biomechanical properties and correlation with collagen solubility profile in the posterior sclera of canine eyes with an ADAMTS10 mutation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2013; 54(4): 2685–2695.
41.
Gol’DenveizerAL. Theory of elastic thin shells. Pergamon Press, 1961.
42.
VlasovVZ. General theory of shells and its application in engineering. NASA TT F-99. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1964.
43.
BattaglioliJLKammRD. Measurements of the compressive properties of scleral tissue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1984; 25(1): 59–65.
44.
SoedelW. Vibrations of shells and plates. CRC Press, 2004.
45.
MorsePMIngardKU. Theoretical acoustics. Princeton University Press, 1986.
46.
AbramowitzMStegunIA. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. US Government Printing Office, 1964.
47.
COMSOLAB. COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6, www.comsol.com (2020, accessed 15 February 2026).
48.
WooSLKobayashiASLawrenceC, et al. Mathematical model of the corneo-scleral shell as applied to intraocular pressure–volume relations and applanation tonometry. Ann Biomed Eng1972; 1(1): 87–98.
49.
NogueiraPZanklMSchlattlH, et al. Dose conversion coefficients for monoenergetic electrons incident on a realistic human eye model with different lens cell populations. Phys Med Biol2011; 56(21): 6919.
