Abstract
Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is reported to have distinct clinical and histologic presentations in patients with HIV infection. Here we present 20 cases to further define some of these unique characteristics. Common features include erythematous, scaly papules, and plaques involving areas beyond the typical seborrheic distribution; thick, greasy scale on the scalp; and an increased frequency of erythroderma. Histologically, there is widespread parakeratosis, spongiosis, and necrotic keratinocytes. Treatment is often difficult, requiring prolonged use of oral and topical antifungals and corticosteroids as well as antibiotics for bacterial superinfection. SD with these features represents a marker for HIV infection and can aid in early diagnosis.
Introduction
In patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is common (prevalence 20–83%), and has been reported to have distinct clinical and histopathologic features compared to HIV-negative patients.1–3 Here, we present 20 cases of HIV-associated SD to further delineate its unique clinical and histologic characteristics. Recognition of this variant may aid in early detection and treatment of HIV.
Cases
Demographics.
ART: antiretroviral therapy.
Physical findings included exuberant erythema and scale originating within a typical seborrheic distribution on the face and scalp, but also extending to other areas. There was often extensive involvement of the scalp, axillae, groin, and extremities, particularly flexural surfaces. There was marked yellow scaling of the scalp, which was greasier and thicker than typical SD. Multiple patients had bacterial superinfection. Notably, five patients were erythrodermic; three of these had biopsies consistent with SD (see Figure 1).
Clinical presentation of diffuse HIV-related seborrheic dermatitis. (a) Scalp involvement in an erythrodermic patient. (b) Scalp involvement with thick, yellow, greasy, and confluent scale. (c and d) Prominent axillary and groin involvement.
Biopsies were performed in six cases. Four were read by local pathologists as consistent with SD. Slides from two cases were available for review by a US dermatopathologist, which demonstrated epidermal acanthosis, widespread parakeratosis, spongiosis, necrotic keratinocytes, and a mixed infiltrate of plasma cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. These features have been described in association with HIV-related SD. 4
Importantly, our patients were refractory to standard SD treatments and required prolonged courses of topical and systemic antifungals plus topical or oral corticosteroids. Treatment failure and frequent recurrence were common. Several cases showed improvement following initiation of anti-staphylococcal antibiotics.
Discussion
The distinct appearance and recalcitrance of SD in HIV has been noted previously, with some authors suggesting it should be classified as a distinct entity altogether.4–7
Clinically, our cases were notable for extensive involvement beyond typical seborrheic areas, including the extremities, groin, and axillae, consistent with other reports.3,4 The markedly thick, yellow scale on the scalp also appears to be a distinguishing feature, as is the propensity to cause erythroderma, which has not been well described in the literature.
Histologically, lesions of SD in HIV-negative patients demonstrate spongiosis and a lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, as well as follicular plugs with parakeratotic cells and uneven rete ridges. 7 Our two cases reviewed by a US dermatopathologist showed necrotic keratinocytes, more widespread parakeratosis, and a superficial perivascular infiltrate of plasma cells. Soeprono et al. 4 described these differences in detail. Of note, however, our cases did not demonstrate focal dermal-epidermal obliteration as seen by Soeprono et al.
The pathophysiology of this SD variant is unknown, but one hypothesis involves immune dysregulation leading to alterations in quantity and speciation of fungal growth on the skin. However, there is disagreement in the literature as to whether HIV-associated SD has higher 8 or lower 5 levels of Pityrosporum yeast compared to SD in HIV-negative patients. The skin of patients with HIV may also have an altered dermal lipid profile9,10 and produces heat shock proteins not seen in HIV-negative patients with SD or psoriasis. 6
The relationship of SD severity to CD4 cell count appears uncertain both in the literature and in our patients. SD can be an early finding in HIV patients with high CD4 cell counts,11–13 but it is also reported to increase in severity with worsening immunosuppression. 1 In our cases, it is notable that only seven patients had a CD4 cell count lower than 200 cells/μl, suggesting that the degree of immunosuppression need not be profound. In general, however, those with very low CD4 cell counts had particularly severe disease. The three patients with the lowest CD4 cell counts (25, 31, 115 cells/μl) were all erythrodermic. It is not clear whether ART improves the dermatitis or makes it less refractory to treatment.13–15 As is typical for HIV-related SD, many of our patients received prolonged treatment with topical and systemic antifungals plus topical or oral corticosteroids as well as oral antibiotics, when needed, to address bacterial superinfection.
In summary, we describe a series of 20 patients with diffuse HIV-associated SD to highlight its severe and distinctive clinical appearance, its notable propensity for erythroderma, and its chronic course that is often refractory to standard SD treatments. We believe this pattern serves as a marker for underlying HIV infection. Because patients may present with a relatively high CD4 cell count, recognition of this disease variant may aid early screening and diagnosis of HIV.
Footnotes
Authors’ contributions
Drs Forrestel and Micheletti had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Drs Maurer, Mosam, Micheletti. Acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data: Drs Forrestel, Micheletti, Maurer, Mosam, Gupta, Kovarik. Drafting of the manuscript: Dr Forrestel. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Drs Micheletti, Mosam, Maurer, Kovarik. Statistical analysis: Drs Forrestel, Micheletti.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
