Abstract
Female sex workers (FSWs) are at high risk of HIV infection. Alcohol use prior to sex can compound this risk. We investigated the factors associated with having sex under the influence of alcohol among Zambian FSWs. Community health workers and peer FSWs recruited 331 HIV-negative FSWs in Lusaka and Ndola. In a cross-sectional survey, we asked FSWs how often they had sex under the influence of alcohol in the previous month and categorised responses as ‘always’ and ‘not always’. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of always having sex under the influence of alcohol were higher among FSWs who charged clients medium (AOR: 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–4.68) and low fees (AOR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.26–5.60) for sex versus high fees; received 9–19 (AOR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.15–4.91) and 20 or more clients per month (AOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.47–6.37) versus up to 8 clients per month; and never used condoms versus always used condoms with clients (AOR: 4.21, 95% CI: 1.53–11.55). FSWs who always used alcohol before sex appeared more likely to engage in riskier sex and charge clients lower fees. Interventions for financial empowerment and alcohol risk reduction should complement existing HIV prevention interventions for FSWs.
Introduction
With an estimated 980,000 (820,000–1,200,000) new HIV infections every year, sub-Saharan Africa is in the midst of an epidemic. 1 One of the drivers of the HIV epidemic is alcohol use, which lowers inhibitions and elevates the likelihood of condomless sex.2–6 Sex work is simultaneously characterised by risky sexual behaviour and frequent alcohol use. 7 Sex work usually occurs in drinking venues, making it likely that female sex workers (FSWs) and/or their sexual partners will be intoxicated during ensuing sexual encounters.8,9 These factors converge to render FSWs vulnerable to acquiring and transmitting sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV.10–13
Although risky, having sex under the influence of alcohol is commonplace among FSWs and is potentially tied to the financial relationship between FSWs and their clients. 7 Globally, research shows that clients of FSWs often purchase alcohol for FSWs in order to facilitate the sexual transaction. 7 In Malawi and Zambia, FSWs who frequently had sex under the influence of alcohol reported using alcohol to lower their inhibitions and attract clients.14,15
In Zambia, FSWs have an estimated HIV prevalence of 50%, which is almost five times greater than that of the general population.1,16 FSWs also have a high prevalence (43%) of alcohol use, have no intermediaries and negotiate directly with clients.17,18 Drinking before sex diminishes an FSW’s agency to negotiate safe sex with clients because alcohol use before sex inhibits the discussion of risk between sexual partners; increases the frequency of condomless sex; and elevates the risk of acquiring HIV.19–21 Finding out the factors associated with drinking before sex could inform the design of targeted behavioural interventions for FSWs who are a high-risk group for HIV. Despite this, there are no studies among FSWs in Zambia focusing on situational alcohol use and its potential consequences. To fill this knowledge gap, we studied the associated factors of having sex under the influence of alcohol among FSWs in Zambia.
Methods
Design and setting
This cross-sectional study draws from baseline questionnaires among FSWs enrolled in an HIV-incidence study at two HIV research sites in Lusaka and Ndola. Participants were enrolled between September 2012 and May 2015.
Participants
The inclusion criteria included identifying as a sex worker, i.e. exchanging sex for money, being unmarried, being HIV-negative and aged 18 to 45 years. Of the 419 FSWs interviewed at baseline, 331 FSWs reported that they ever used alcohol and thus formed the subset of our analysis for this study.
Study procedures
The University of Zambia Research Ethics Committee (REF. No. 011–01-14) (Lusaka, Zambia) and the Emory University Institutional Review Board (IRB00071160) (Atlanta, GA, USA) approved this study. Seventeen community-based health workers and 12 peer sex workers recruited FSWs from sex work hotspots in Lusaka and Ndola. Recruiters approached FSWs in bars, boarding houses, lodges and streets, handing out written invitations for HIV counselling and testing at the research site. FSWs who tested HIV-negative were eligible to enrol in a broader HIV-incidence study of which our study is a subset.
Enrolled participants provided informed consent to take part in the study in English, Bemba or Nyanja. Medical staff, trained to minimise bias, administered a face-to-face standardised survey to all participants, which contained questions on socioeconomic information and HIV risk behaviour. FSWs underwent gynaecological examinations with screening for syphilis (rapid plasma reagin serology) and for Trichomonas vaginalis (microscopy of vaginal swabs). Participants were reimbursed for their travel to and from the study sites. We also provided food and beverages to all participants during enrolment visits.
Outcome
FSWs were asked how often they had sex under the influence of alcohol in the preceding month, to which they responded: ‘always’, ‘most of the time’, ‘sometimes’, ‘rarely’ or ‘never’. For ease of interpretation, we dichotomised this variable into ‘always’ and ‘not always’ to create our study outcome. Since only 3% (n = 10) of FSWs reported never having sex under the influence of alcohol, we had inadequate statistical power to compare this sub-group against FSWs who reported drinking before sex. We did not use The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) or CAGE questionnaires to inform our outcome as these measures typically assess problem drinking/alcohol misuse, whereas the focus of our study was situational alcohol use, i.e. drinking before sex.
Explanatory variables
We examined associations between volunteer characteristics and our outcome. The literature informed our explanatory variable choices, which fell broadly under one of three categories: socioeconomics, behaviour or STI test results.12,22 Socioeconomic variables were age, level of education, city of residence, reason for beginning sex work, number of years in sex work and amount charged per sexual act. Charges for sex with clients were categorised as low (≤45 Zambian Kwacha [ZMK]), medium (46–89 ZMK) and high (≥90 ZMK) (one United States Dollar [USD] = ∼13 ZMK). Behavioural variables included monthly volume of clients and condom use with clients. STI test results were for syphilis and Trichomonas vaginalis.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics calculated were frequencies, percentages and Chi square tests to examine the difference in sample characteristics between FSWs who always/not always had sex under the influence of alcohol. We then conducted bivariate logistic regression analysis to test each of the explanatory variables against the outcome. Variables that were significant in bivariate analysis at p < 0.25 were selected for multivariable analysis as per recommended guidelines. 23 We employed a forward stepwise method to construct the final multivariable logistic regression model. We chose to adjust for the potential confounding effect of age a priori because our study participants had a broad age range (18–45 years). We conducted a complete case analysis to deal with missingness. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
The median age of participants was 23 years with an interquartile range (IQR) of 20 to 28. As shown in Table 1, the majority of women enrolled lived in Ndola (68%) and had primary school level education (52%). The median duration in sex work was two years (IQR: 1–3). FSWs in our cohort saw a median of 10 clients per month (IQR: 6–20).
Sample characteristics by frequency of sex under the influence of alcohol among Zambian FSWs (N = 331).
FSWs: female sex workers; STI: sexually transmitted infection; ZMK: Zambian Kwacha. Note that numbers do not always equal the total due to missingness.
Of the 331 women who reported using alcohol before sex in the preceding month, 88 (27%) always had sex under the influence of alcohol; 72 (22%) mostly had sex under the influence of alcohol; 101 (30%) sometimes had sex under the influence of alcohol; 60 (18%) rarely had sex under the influence of alcohol; and 10 (3%) never had sex under the influence of alcohol. Table 1 displays comparisons of sample characteristics by always versus not always having sex under the influence of alcohol. Ndola-based FSWs had a higher proportion of sexual encounters that were always under the influence of alcohol than Lusaka-based FSWs (p < 0.05) (Table 1). Older and more educated FSWs had a lower proportion of sexual encounters exclusively under the influence of alcohol than their younger and less educated counterparts (p < 0.05) (Table 1). FSWs with more years of experience had a higher proportion of sexual encounters that were always under the influence of alcohol than less experienced FSWs (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the variables associated with sex under the influence of alcohol in multivariable logistic regression analysis. FSWs who never used condoms with clients had a fourfold increase in odds (AOR [adjusted odds ratio]: 4.21, 95% CI: 1.53–11.55) of always having sex under the influence of alcohol compared to FSWs who always used condoms with clients. We also found that FSWs who charged clients medium (AOR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.04–4.68) and low fees (AOR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.26–5.60) were over twice as likely to always have sex under the influence of alcohol as FSWs who charged clients high fees for sex. Compared to FSWs who saw up to 8 clients per month, FSWs who saw 9–19 (AOR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.15–4.91) and 20 or more clients per month (AOR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.47–6.37) had increased odds of always having sex under the influence of alcohol.
Adjusted and unadjusted factors associated with always having sex under the influence of alcohol among Zambian FSWs (N = 331).
FSWs: female sex workers; STI: sexually transmitted infection; ZMK: Zambian Kwacha; OR: odds ratio (age-adjusted); CI: confidence interval.
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Discussion
Our results show that 97% of FSWs reported some level of alcohol use before sex in the preceding month. This prevalence is higher than that found among FSWs in Kenya (76%), China (30%), Mexico (69%) and the Middle East and North Africa (37%).12,13,24,25 We found that FSWs who charged clients lower fees, saw more clients and never used condoms with clients were more likely to always have sex under the influence of alcohol. Our findings collectively suggest that drinking before sex results in FSWs engaging in risky sexual behaviour and receiving decreased income from sex work.
Socioeconomics
In our cohort, FSWs who charged their clients low fees had over twofold greater odds of always having sex under the influence of alcohol than FSWs who charged clients high fees. This is an important finding in the context of low-income countries, such as Zambia, where FSWs mostly come from impoverished backgrounds. 26 In support of this, our data show that 83% of FSWs began practising sex work to meet their financial needs. This is consistent with the economic background of FSWs from other African countries, whose motivations for beginning sex work are financial.27,28
The literature demonstrates a link between low economic empowerment and increased risk-taking behaviour such as condomless sex among African FSWs.29,30 In our analysis, the median monthly client volume for FSWs who charged high fees (n = 12) was similar to that of FSWs who charged low fees (n = 10). This implies that, irrespective of client volume, FSWs who charge low fees for sex earn less monthly income than FSWs who charge high fees for sex. Recent evidence from an FSW cohort in Cameroon reveals that high monthly income corresponds to a reduction in new HIV infections. 31 Charging clients lower fees for sex due to the apparent influence of alcohol could hence be detrimental to both the livelihood and sexual health of FSWs. This calls for HIV prevention interventions for FSWs to include financial empowerment tools, which improve FSWs agency to negotiate condom use and be more selective of clients, as shown in Tanzania. 32 This package would combine negotiating skills and risk reduction counselling around alcohol use to better preserve the financial and sexual well-being of FSWs.
Risky sexual behaviour
It is well corroborated that alcohol use before sex is associated with multiple sexual partners and inconsistent condom use. 21 We found that FSWs who saw more clients and never used condoms with clients had higher odds of having sex under the influence of alcohol. Our findings mirror those among FSWs in Kenya and China, where having sex under the influence of alcohol was associated with lower condom use and higher rates of STI.12,13 Although we did not identify any direct associations between sex under the influence of alcohol and syphilis or trichomoniasis, it is likely that condomless sex mediates this relationship.
These findings further reinforce our recommendation that HIV prevention programmes for FSWs include risk reduction interventions on alcohol consumption before sexual encounters. In Kenya, FSWs who received a peer-delivered behavioural HIV prevention intervention were more likely to use condoms with occasional clients than those who did not. 33 This is an encouraging example for other sub-Saharan African countries such as Zambia, where FSWs have a high prevalence of alcohol use before sex, linked to condomless sex. Using FSWs to deliver such interventions to their peers could help circumvent the barriers of stigma that FSWs face from healthcare workers.34,35
Limitations and future directions
In spite of their significance, our findings have certain limitations. We cannot infer causality from our results due to the cross-sectional methodology of our study. The variables on the frequency of sex under the influence of alcohol, charges, client volume and condom use in the past month were all self-report and subject to recall bias. Moreover, alcohol use itself can affect recall. Providing coital calendars to participants could help surmount the challenge of recall.
Our study only presented the perspective of the FSWs and not that of the client. In the context of sex work in Zambia, negotiation and sexual encounters are a two-way street between FSWs and clients. Conducting a similar study among clients of FSWs, who also use alcohol before sex, 7 would provide a more complete picture of why sex under the influence of alcohol is likely cheaper and condomless.
Amidst the outlined limitations, our findings contribute importantly to the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to elucidate that sex under the influence of alcohol results in a decrease in the financial earnings of FSWs. This finding may be generalisable in sub-Saharan Africa where FSWs are typically poor and regularly use alcohol.36–38 In the future, qualitative studies among FSWs and their clients could shed more light on how drinking before sex affects the negotiation of price.
Conclusions
We have shown, among HIV-negative FSWs in Zambia, that always having sex under the influence of alcohol results in lower charges and risky sexual behaviour with clients. This calls for multi-level interventions that target both FSWs and their clients. Based on previously cited successful interventions in Tanzania and Kenya,32,33 we offer that these interventions be three-tiered and serve to (1) empower FSWs with financial negotiation skills; (2) counsel FSWs on alcohol risk reduction; and (3) offer alcohol risk reduction counselling to clients of FSWs. Such interventions could simultaneously tackle the coexisting burdens of poverty and alcohol use before sex, which – if left unabated – fuel the concentrated HIV epidemic among FSWs in sub-Saharan Africa.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all participants and study staff for their invaluable contributions to this work.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) with the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID, https://www.usaid.gov/). A full list of IAVI donors can be found at https://www.iavi.org/; National Institutes of Health (
) grants (R01 MH66767, R01 HD40125 and R01 MH95503; R01 AI051231); the AIDS International Training and Research Program Fogarty International Center (D43 TW001042) and the Emory Center for AIDS Research (P30 AI050409). The contents of this manuscript are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the US Government.
