Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare malignancy which HIV infection appears to increase the risk of. The magnitude of this risk and the pathogenesis remain unclear. A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken using conventional search strategies. Twenty-four publications were identified by this methodology, of which nine were case reports and 15 were observational studies. These studies were highly heterogeneous, with varying study designs, populations, and objectives. The risk of penile cancer within HIV-positive individuals is significantly greater than in those without HIV (RR = 3 .7 to 5.8, 3 studies; SIR = 3.8 to 11.1, 4 studies). HIV is also shown to influence disease characteristics, with a four-fold increased risk of death from penile cancer. Moreover, progression from intraepithelial neoplasia occurs earlier in HIV, six years sooner than in HIV-negative men. HIV-positive men have a higher prevalence of HPV infection. Ethnicity is also shown to modulate the relationship between HIV and penile carcinoma, with a higher risk of cancer in Hispanic, compared with Caucasian, HIV-positive men. This review has collated data from diverse sources to improve understanding of the relationship between HIV and penile cancer. This relationship has been quantitatively and qualitatively characterised and highlights areas deserving further enquiry.
Keywords
Introduction
Penile cancer is a rare cancer, the majority (95%) being squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) although other types are seen.1,2 Recognised risk factors for penile (Pe)SCC include omission of neonatal circumcision, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, lichen sclerosus (LSc) and phimosis, HIV, tobacco use, and poor penile hygiene, of which circumcision status is probably the most important.1,3–6 In the uncircumcised the most significant drivers seem to be HPV and LSc with a dichotomous but sometimes overlapping carcinogenetic pathway analogous to vulval cancer.4,5,7
HIV is known to increase the risk of a number of cancers e.g. Kaposi sarcoma (KS), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and invasive cervical cancer, i.e. those that together constitute the AIDS-defining cancers (ADC). 6 Although AIDS‐related cancers are decreasing in incidence, non‐AIDS‐defining cancers (NADC) are on the increase, particularly non‐melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and ano‐oro‐genital cancer. 8 Specific risk factors for SCC of the skin in HIV-positive individuals include low CD4 nadir and viral load.9,10
As with all NMSC, HIV also appears to increase the risk of developing PeSCC, despite antiretroviral treatment.4,11,12 At present, the exact nature of this relationship, the risk ratio (RR) and mechanisms that lead HIV-positive men to develop PSCC, remain unclear.
We have undertaken a literature review to determine what is known and published about the relationship and interplay of HIV with PeSCC.
Methods
We searched Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library using a prespecified search criteria. The search terms used were HIV, AIDS, HIV-1, HIV-2, human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, AND penile cancer, penis cancer, penile neoplasm, penile carcinoma, non-melanoma.
Titles, abstract and full texts were imported into Mendeley reference manager. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers to assess if they met our prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any discrepancies in findings were resolved by a third reviewer. Relevant data from the manuscripts were extracted and tabulated.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
We included published articles concerning PeSCC amongst patients with known HIV infection, in any language, country and publication date. Articles that mentioned penile cancer alone, without reference to HIV/AIDS, were excluded. Articles about HPV-associated, anogenital, or non-melanoma cancers, without clarification of the specific site of cancer, were excluded. Case reports and case series were included, but literature reviews were excluded. Articles about penile carcinoma in situ/penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) were also excluded. Wherever it was possible so to determine, articles relating to non-PeSCC penile cancer were excluded.
Results
A total of 303 articles were identified through our search across all three databases. Nineteen additional articles were identified by screening the citations of these papers. All 322 articles were scrutinised through their abstract and 232 papers were excluded. The 90 remaining articles were then assessed for relevance based on their full text. A total of 24 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion (Figure 1). The studies included in this review were highly heterogeneous, with varying study designs, populations, and objectives. PRISMA chart showing literature search and study selection.
Case reports and case series
Case reports included in the study.
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; (Pe)SCC, (penile) squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papilloma virus; ART, antiretroviral therapy; LN, lymphadenopathy; MSM, men who have sex with men; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; Pt., patient.
Observational studies
Observational studies included in the study. *These studies form part of the NIH HIV/AIDS cancer match Study.
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papilloma virus; ART, antiretroviral therapy; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; SIR, standardised incidence ratio; RR, risk ratio; aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; OR, odds ratio; MSM, men who have sex with men; IVDU, intravenous drug user.
Prevalence of PeSCC amongst HIV-positive individuals
A three-year study by Fuchs and colleagues attempted to determine the prevalence of anogenital disease, including PeSCC, within 400 HIV-positive individuals through the use of a screening programme. 25 One case of PeSCC was observed at baseline (0.25%) and no additional cases were diagnosed within 3 years of regular follow up.
In another study of 2560 HIV-positive men, two cases of PeSCC were identified in a retrospective chart review, representing a prevalence of 0.08%. 32
Risk of PeSCC amongst HIV-positive individuals
Risk of PeSCC in HIV/AIDS
Two of these studies were based upon a sample of HIV-positive men (with and without AIDS, without differentiating between the two groups) and found the risk of PeSCC ranged from 3.8 to 5.8 times that of HIV-negative individuals.30,33
One study explored HIV-positive men (stratified by AIDS status) and found that only those with AIDS had an increased SIR of developing PeSCC (SIR = 11.1). 27
Another four studies were concerned only with patients diagnosed with AIDS. In these, the risk of PeSCC ranged from 3.7 to 8.0 times that of HIV-negative individuals.6,11,23,24
Within these studies, the risk of developing PeSCC was highly variable between different population subgroups. In one such study, the risk of PeSCC was increased in men who have sex with men (MSM) and heterosexual men (SIR = 4.4 and = 14.7, respectively), but failed to reach statistical significance in the intravenous drug user (IVDU) group. 23 Conversely, in another study, IVDUs were the only exposure group to reach statistical significance (RR = 7.1). 11 In the same study, the increased risk of PeSCC was only significant in Black and Hispanic patients (RR = 5.3 and = 5.4, respectively) but not amongst White patients.
Characteristics of PeSCC amongst HIV-positive individuals
Some studies included in this review provided further qualitative and quantitative findings to characterise PeSCC as it appears in HIV-positive individuals.
In the study by Ngendahayo and colleagues, out of 30 Rwandan men with PeSCC, six were HIV positive and undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least two years. 29 In them, HIV infection showed no relationship to disease presentation or progression.
In contrast, other studies did demonstrate HIV as a variable for PeSCC. Chalya et al. demonstrated that HIV positivity increased the risk of death from PeSCC four-fold. 22 Additionally, HIV-positive patients undergoing surgical management of PeSCC were more likely to experience surgical site infections.
Frisch et al. published data on the age difference at the point of PeIN and PeSCC diagnoses. In the general population, the average age of diagnosis of PeSCC was 7.6 years older than that of PeIN. In contrast, in the AIDS group, the age difference was reduced to only 1.7 years, thus suggesting an accelerated progress to invasive disease. Moreover, the risk of PeSCC was greatest in those diagnosed with AIDS below the age of 30 (RR = 37.2), with the risk decreased with increasing age of AIDS onset. 11
Three articles, all based upon the HACM Study, compared the risk of developing PeSCC prior to AIDS diagnosis with that of post-AIDS diagnosis.6,11,23 Although a positive trend was observed, this trend was marginally non-significant. In another study, Parkin et al. did not observe a trend linking the incidence of PeSCC to the timeline of the AIDS epidemic. 31
A large study of HIV-positive Hispanic men found them to be at 2.6 times greater risk of PeSCC than non-Hispanic White men with HIV. 30 Moreover, there was no difference in PeSCC risk between Hispanic men and Black men with HIV. Finally, no difference was found in the five-year survival between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with PeSCC.
In a study of 65 patients with PeSCC, by Wentzel et al., HIV-positive men had a significantly lower age at presentation compared with HIV-negative men (mean difference 13.5 years). 34
Amongst nine case reports and series, data regarding HPV status were included for four patients;13,17,21 all were of high-risk HPV subtypes, except one. 17 Similarly, in the study by Wentzel et al., HIV-positive men had a higher prevalence of HPV infection, compared to those without HIV (55.6% vs 23.8%). 34
Discussion
Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, especially in Europe and the USA where it occurs with an incidence of 0.1–0.9 per 100,000 males. 1 In contrast, the incidence of penile cancer is markedly higher in South America, Southeast Asia, and Africa where it can account for up to 10% of male cancers and tends to affect younger patients compared with the Western world.1,2 The vast majority (over 95%) of penile cancers are histologically classified as PeSCC, followed by less common types, such as adenocarcinoma, melanoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and true sarcoma.2,35,36
A number of risk factors have been identified for PeSCC, most importantly the presence of a foreskin (i.e. omission of neonatal or childhood circumcision), HPV infection, LSc and phimosis, HIV, tobacco use, and poor penile hygiene. Omission of neonatal circumcision is probably the single biggest risk factor for developing PeSCC and neonatal circumcision, therefore, is an effective prophylactic measure.3,37 However, circumcision in later life is thought to reduce the risk of cancer only partially and less so if circumcision is performed for the treatment of penile disease. 4 LSc also predisposes to PeSCC, with one small study indicating a past history and/or evidence of LSc in over half of PeSCC patients. 5 HPV is also recognised as a principal risk factor for penile cancer, having been identified in 22–45% of penile tumours. 4 Unlike cervical cancer, where HPV is the principal aetiological agent, but more like vulval cancer, PeSCC is thought to arise from PeIN via two distinct carcinogenic pathways: HPV-related (undifferentiated PeIN) and non-HPV-related (differentiated PeIN), the latter being associated with LSc. 7 Histologically, HPV-related PeSCC is largely of basaloid and warty or condylomatous subtypes, while the non-HPV, or LSc-related pathway, most often gives rise to the ‘usual’ and verrucous subtypes. 4
The primary objective of this study was to determine what is currently known and published in the literature about the relationship with, and interplay between, HIV and PeSCC. Particular attention has been given to addressing epidemiology, patient characteristics, aetiology, and outcomes. A broad, heterogeneous range of evidence has been uncovered and explored to synthesise a summary of this topic. Given this heterogeneity, it has not been possible to perform a formal meta-analysis, yet some important conclusions can nonetheless be drawn.
We present multisource evidence to demonstrate categorically the significantly increased risk of PeSCC in those with HIV. Although this relationship is already generally accepted, this review adds rigour to the claim. It also shows the range of magnitude of the actual risk that has been calculate (RR = 3.7 to 5.8, three studies; SIR = 3.8 to 11.1, four studies). Estimates of risk are markedly variable between studies, most likely because penile cancer is a rare malignancy. Therefore, analysis of risk is based only on a small number of cases, despite large HIV-positive study populations.
Ethnicity is also found to be a variable that appears to modulate the relationship between HIV infection and PeSCC. Most notably, Ortiz and colleagues reported Hispanic men to be at almost 3 times greater risk of PeSCC than White American men living with HIV. 30 This may be attributed to differences in rates of circumcision in White and Hispanic Americans (reported to be 91% and 44%, respectively), or to disparity in healthcare between ethnic and socioeconomic groups. 38 Further studies addressing ethnicity would be necessary to improve our understanding of the risk factors for PeSCC in different ethnic populations.
Beyond increasing the risk of developing PeSCC, HIV infection may also give rise to different phenotypes of penile disease. Wentzel et al. indicated that HIV-positive men with PeSCC present at a significantly earlier age than HIV-negative men. 34 Similarly, Frisch et al. observed a shorter interval between diagnosis of PeIN and PeSCC in those with HIV infection, suggesting more rapid transformation to invasive disease in HIV. 11 HIV infection is therefore likely to drive oncogenesis and transformation to PeSCC at an earlier age, a phenomenon also seen in other SCCs, such as those of the cervix and lung. 34
Furthermore, HIV status seems to affect clinical outcomes: HIV increased the risk of mortality from PeSCC four-fold in one study. 22 Conversely, another study found no effect of HIV status (in patients undergoing ART for more than 2 years) on disease characteristics or progression. 29 These findings highlight the varying phenotypic spectrum of HIV disease, from undetectable viral load to AIDS, variability that has not been controlled for in this review. Indeed, the question of whether effective ART negates the effect of HIV on PeSCC is an intriguing area for further research.
Regarding the aetiopathogenesis of penile cancer in the context of HIV, review of the literature shows that it is difficult to make generalisations or come to conclusions, but does allow the generation of hypotheses. What can be said ensues.
Across cancer types, HIV and AIDS are most signally associated with cancers of infectious origin; this implicates susceptibility to oncogenic viruses as the driver of the excess burden of malignancy in the HIV-positive population. 12 HIV infection is associated with increased HPV incidence, higher rates of co-infection with multiple HPV genotypes, reduced HPV clearance, and greater progression to pre-neoplastic lesions.39,40 Moreover, HIV-positive men diagnosed with PeSCC are significantly more likely to be co-infected with HPV, when compared with HIV-negative men. 34 Whether the relationship between HIV and HPV infection is causal or simply due to common lifestyle factors that give rise to both HIV and HPV is debated in the literature.6,12 The largest study to date, a meta-analysis of cancer in people with HIV/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients, demonstrated similar patterns of excess HPV-associated cancers in both groups. 12 Given that lifestyle-related cancer risk factors likely differ between the two groups, increased cancer risk may in fact be attributed to immunocompromise.
We have noted a paucity of findings relating to HPV status. Wentzel and colleagues reported HIV-positive men to have a greater likelihood of HPV positivity, a finding in keeping with existing literature and the conclusions made above. 34 To further this line of enquiry, future research could explore the relationships with oncogenic high risk HPV types and undifferentiated PeIN; we have not specifically addressed the literature relating to PeIN in HIV and this itself may be a fruitful endeavour.
Further characterising the nature of immunocompromise and its relation to cancer risk is challenging. Immune status varies considerably during the course of HIV infection and AIDS, and it would be helpful to identify parameters of immune function that contribute to cancer risk. In PeSCC, Frisch et al. showed a correlation between the age of AIDS onset and the RR of PeSCC, with the greatest risk in those diagnosed with AIDS below the age of 30; the risk of PeSCC was significantly elevated during the first 4–27 months post-AIDS diagnosis, when compared with the pre-AIDS period. 11 But another study by the same group failed to find an association between CD4 count at the time of AIDS diagnosis and PeSCC risk. 6 Yet, CD4 nadir has been suggested to be a risk factor for NMSC.9,10 A retrospective study of HIV-positive patients found an inverse relationship between SCC risk and most recent CD4 count. 41 Moreover, a prospective study of HIV-positive patients in Denmark found the risk of SCC to be related to nadir, but not most recent, CD4 count thus highlighting the importance of the history of immune status. 10 These findings are congruent with work on transplant recipients where the degree of pharmacological immunosuppression has been shown to correlate with SCC risk.42,43
The conflicting data regarding the relationship of CD4 nadir to PeSCC risk are intriguing. The topic is being further researched by us in our small but slowly growing cohort of patients. Intuitively, an important working hypothesis is that the risk of penile cancer must be related to the profundity and duration of immunocompromise. But immune function is a complex entity that is difficult to measure; a single CD4 count provides only a snapshot proxy marker of immune function. Instead, assessing the CD4 count (and other parameters) through the course of disease may prove more valuable, albeit investigationally challenging in retrospect. Nonetheless, future research could employ study designs that better characterise and measure immune function. Also, there is a scarcity of research concerning the immunopathogenesis of penile cancer in general that further limits our understanding of the drivers of PeSCC in HIV-positive individuals. For example, oncogenic HPV infection is probably more prevalent than appreciated, yet penile cancer is rare. There is no evidence that LSc is more prevalent in HIV and LSc does not emerge from the literature as risk factor for PeSCC in HIV, although we have seen cases, probably because the topic has not been addressed.
We have performed a comprehensive review of what has been published about HIV and penile cancer, embracing a range of study designs and settings. A limitation is that it is not a formal meta-analysis. Given the heterogeneity of relevant studies, we decided to conduct a literature review to ensure a comprehensive range of qualitative and quantitative data were obtained for consideration. Furthermore, while inclusion of both HIV and AIDS populations was necessary given the existing literature, it makes interpretation of results complex. The most pertinent findings are that the risk of penile cancer is indeed higher in HIV/AIDS (RR = 3.7 to 5.8, 3 studies; SIR = 3.8 to 11.1, 4 studies) and four times more lethal; progression from PeIN occurs ∼6 years sooner; certain ethnic groups (e.g. Hispanic) are more at risk.
More work is needed to understand the risk of cancer amongst the two populations, namely people living with HIV and people with AIDS, as well as in those undergoing effective ART.
We intend this study to be a useful reference for the relationship of HIV and PeSCC. We anticipate that it will be of utility in hypothesis-generation for further research into the aetiology and characteristics of penile cancer and other skin cancers, or indeed all cancers, in people living with HIV and AIDS.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
