Readers Use Bayesian Estimation for Eye Movement Control

Abstract

During reading, saccadic landing positions within words show a pronounced peak close to the word center, with an additional systematic error that is modulated by the distance from the launch site and the length of the target word. Here we show that the systematic variation of fixation positions within words, the saccadic range error, can be derived from Bayesian decision theory. We present the first mathematical model for the saccadic range error; this model makes explicit assumptions regarding underlying visual and oculomotor processes. Analyzing a corpus of eye movement recordings, we obtained results that are consistent with the view that readers use Bayesian estimation for saccade planning. Furthermore, we show that alternative models fail to reproduce the experimental data.

Keywords

reading eye movements saccadic range error Bayesian model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Engbert

Nuthmann

(2008). Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading. PLoS ONE, 3, e1534. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0001534

Engbert

Nuthmann

Richter

E.M.

Kliegl

(2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.

Findlay

J.M.

(1982). Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 22, 1033–1045.

Kapoula

(1985). Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system. Vision Research, 25, 1155–1157.

Kliegl

Nuthmann

Engbert

(2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.

Körding

K.P.

(2007). Decision theory: What “should” the nervous system do? Science, 318, 606–610.

Körding

K.P.

Wolpert

D.M.

(2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427, 244–247.

Körding

K.P.

Wolpert

D.M.

(2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 319–326.

Legge

G.E.

Hooven

T.A.

Klitz

T.S.

Mansfield

J.S.

Tjan

B.S.

(2002). Mr. Chips 2002: New insights from an ideal-observer model of reading. Vision Research, 42, 2219–2234.

10.

McConkie

G.W.

Kerr

P.W.

Reddix

M.D.

Zola

(1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–1118.

11.

Nuthmann

Engbert

(2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49, 322–336.

12.

Nuthmann

Engbert

Kliegl

(2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–2217.

13.

Rayner

(1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21–30.

14.

Rayner

(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.

15.

Rayner

Pollatsek

(1989). The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Rayner

Sereno

S.C.

Raney

G.E.

(1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188–1200.

17.

Reichle

E.D.

Pollatsek

Fisher

D.L.

Rayner

(1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157.

18.

Reichle

E.D.

Rayner

Pollatsek

(1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403–4411.

19.

Vitu

(1991). Against the existence of a range effect during reading. Vision Research, 31, 2009–2015.

20.

Wolpert

D.M.

Ghahramani

(in press). Bayes rule in perception, action and cognition. In Gregory

R.L.

(Ed.), Oxford companion to consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.

21.

Yang

S.-N.

(2006). An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 56–69.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.54 MB

0.01 MB