Facial-Feature Resemblance Elicits the Transference Effect

Abstract

In transference, a perceiver’s representation of a significant other is activated and used to interpret and respond to a new target person who bears some resemblance to the particular significant other. Integrating research on face perception and transference, we hypothesized that transference can occur on the basis of the resemblance of a target’s facial features to those of a perceiver’s significant other. Experimental results supported this hypothesis. Manipulating an upcoming interaction partner’s facial features to resemble those of participants’ significant other led participants to make representation-consistent inferences about and evaluations of the partner. Moreover, participants undergoing transference experienced shifts in their self-concept, so that they described themselves more like the person they are when with the relevant significant other. The results represent the first evidence of transference processes occurring through facial-feature resemblance. Implications for research on impression formation, social cognition, and emotions are discussed.

Keywords

transference face perception significant others impression formation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

S.M.

Baum

(1994). Transference in interpersonal relations: Inferences and affect based on significant-other representations. Journal of Personality, 62, 459–497.

Andersen

S.M.

Chen

(2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.

Andersen

S.M.

Cole

S.W.

(1990). “Do I know you?”: The role of significant others in general social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 384–399.

Andersen

S.M.

Glassman

N.S.

(1996). Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect. In Sorrentino

R.M.

Higgins

E.T.

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 262–321). New York: Guilford Press.

Bar

Neta

Linz

(2006). Very first impressions. Emotion, 6, 269–278.

Barsade

S.G.

(2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–675.

Chen

Andersen

S.M.

(1999). Relationships from the past in the present: Significant-other representations and transference in interpersonal life. In Zanna

M.P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 123–190). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Davies

M.F.

(1997). Private self-consciousness and the acceptance of personality feedback: Confirmatory processing in the evaluation of general vs. specific self-information. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 78–92.

Debruine

L.M.

(2004). Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 142–154.

10.

Debruine

L.M.

Jones

B.C.

Perrett

D.I.

(2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 379–383.

11.

Ekman

(1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In Wagner

Manstead

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychophysiology (pp. 143–164). Chichester, England: Wiley.

12.

Furnham

Varian

(1988). Predicting and accepting personality test scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 735–748.

13.

Gosling

S.D.

Rentrow

P.J.

Swann

W.B.

(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.

14.

Hatfield

Cacioppo

Rapson

R.L.

(1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Hinkley

Andersen

S.M.

(1996). The working self-concept in transference: Significant-other activation and self-change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1279–1295.

16.

Kenny

D.A.

Albright

Malloy

T.E.

Kashy

D.A.

(1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 245–258.

17.

Kramer

Zebrowitz

L.A.

San Giovanni

J.P.

Sherak

(1995). Infants’ preferences for attractiveness and babyfaceness. In Bardy

B.G.

Bootsma

R.J.

Guiard

(Eds.), Studies in perception and action III (pp. 389–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Livingston

R.W.

(2001). What you see is what you get: Systematic variability in perceptual-based social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1086–1096.

19.

Macrae

C.N.

Bodenhausen

G.V.

(2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.

20.

Rhodes

Zebrowitz

L.A.

Clark

Kalick

S.M.

Hightower

McKay

(2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31–46.

21.

Todorov

Mandisodza

A.N.

Goren

Hall

C.C.

(2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626.

22.

Walster

Aronson

Abrahams

Rottman

(1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508–516.

23.

Warner

R.M.

Sugarman

D.B.

(1986). Attributions of personality based on physical appearance, speech, and handwriting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 792–799.

24.

Willis

Todorov

(2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.

25.

Zebrowitz

L.A.

Monteparte

J.M.

(1992). Impressions of baby faced individuals across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1143–1152.