The Role of the Dorsal Visual Processing Stream in Tool Identification

Abstract

The dorsal visual processing stream subserves object-directed action, whereas the ventral visual processing stream subserves visual object recognition. Little is known about how information computed by dorsal-stream structures influences object recognition. We used continuous flash suppression to functionally separate information computed by the dorsal stream from that computed by the ventral stream. We show that information originating from the dorsal stream influences not only decisions requiring the selection of superordinate category labels, but also decisions that entail the selection of a basic-level object. We further show that information computed by the dorsal stream does not carry specific functional information about objects. Our results indicate that the dorsal stream, in isolation from the ventral stream, is agnostic as to the identity of the objects that it processes. We suggest that structures within the dorsal visual processing stream compute motor-relevant information (e.g., graspability), which influences the identification of manipulable objects, and is not either about the function of the object or function-specific.

Keywords

dorsal processing stream graspability object recognition semantic memory tools manipulable objects

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almeida

Mahon

B.Z.

Nakayama

Caramazza

(2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 15214–15218.

Bahrami

Vetter

Spolaore

Pagano

Butterworth

Rees

(2010). Unconscious numerical priming despite interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 21, 224–233.

Buxbaum

L.J.

Saffran

E.M.

(2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language, 82, 179–199.

Buxbaum

L.J.

Schwartz

M.F.

Carew

T.G.

(1997). The role of semantic memory in object use. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 219–254.

Buxbaum

L.J.

Sirigu

Schwartz

M.F.

Klatzky

(2003). Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1091–1113.

Carey

D.P.

Harvey

Milner

A.D.

(1996). Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia, 34, 329–337.

Dehaene

Naccache

Cohen

Le Bihan

Mangin

J.F.

Poline

J.B.

Rivière

(2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752–758.

Fang

(2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380–1385.

Forster

K.I.

Forster

J.C.

(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.

10.

Goodale

M.A.

Milner

A.D.

(1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25.

11.

Heilman

K.M.

Rothi

L.J.G.

(1997). Limb apraxia: A look back. In Rothi

L.J.G.

Heilman

K.M.

(Eds.), Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action (pp. 7–18). Hove, England: Psychology Press.

12.

Helbig

H.B.

Graf

Kiefer

(2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221–228.

13.

Hodges

Bozeat

Lambon-Ralph

Patterson

Spatt

(2000). The role of conceptual knowledge in object use: Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 123, 1913–1925.

14.

Hodges

Spatt

Patterson

(1999). “What” and “how”: Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 9444–9448.

15.

Jeannerod

Decety

Michel

(1994). Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 32, 369–380.

16.

Johnson

S.H.

Grafton

S.T.

(2003). From ‘acting on’ to ‘acting with’: The functional anatomy of object-oriented action schemata. In Prablanc

D.P.C.

Rossetti

(Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 142, pp. 127–139). New York: Elsevier.

17.

Johnson-Frey

S.H.

(2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 71–78.

18.

Mahon

B.Z.

Milleville

S.C.

Negri

G.A.L.

Rumiati

R.I.

Caramazza

Martin

(2007). Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55, 507–520.

19.

Negri

G.A.

Lunardelli

Reverberi

Gigli

G.L.

Rumiati

R.I.

(2007). Degraded semantic knowledge and accurate object use. Cortex, 43, 376–388.

20.

Ochipa

Rothi

L.J.

Heilman

K.M.

(1989). Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology, 25, 190–193.

21.

Rizzolatti

Matelli

(2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 146–157.

22.

Rosenthal

Rosnow

R.L.

Rubin

D.B.

(2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Sheinberg

D.L.

Logothetis

N.K.

(1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 3408–3413.

24.

Shmuelof

Zohary

(2005). Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRl activation during object and action recognition. Neuron, 47, 457–470.

25.

Tong

Nakayama

Vaughan

J.T.

Kanwisher

(1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759.

26.

Tsuchiya

Koch

(2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1096–1101.

27.

Valyear

K.F.

Culham

J.C.

(2010). Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 970–984.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

0.05 MB