Low-spatial-frequency (LSF) visual information is processed in an elemental fashion before a finer analysis of high-spatial-frequency information. Further, the amygdala is particularly responsive to LSF information contained within negative (e.g., fearful) facial expressions. In a separate line of research, it has been shown that surprised facial expressions are ambiguous in that they can be interpreted as either negatively or positively valenced. More negative interpretations of surprise are associated with increased ventral amygdala activity. In this report, we show that LSF presentations of surprised expressions bias the interpretation of surprised expressions in a negative direction, a finding suggesting that negative interpretations are first and fast during the resolution of ambiguous valence. We also examined the influence of subjects’ positivity-negativity bias on this effect.
BarM.KassamK.S.GhumanA.S.BoshyanJ.SchmidA.M.DaleA.M.. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 449–454.
2.
BeckA.T.WardC.MendelsonM. (1961). Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.
3.
CarretieL.HinojosaJ.A.Lopez-MartinS.TapiaM. (2007). An electrophysiological study on the interaction between emotional and spatial frequency of visual stimuli. Neuropsychology, 45, 1187–1195.
4.
de GelderB.VroomenJ.PourtoisG.WeiskrantzL. (1999). Non-conscious recognition of affect in the absence of striate cortex. NeuroReport, 10, 3759–3763.
5.
EimerM.HolmesA. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. NeuroReport, 13, 427–431.
HughesH.C.NozawaG.KitterleF. (1996). Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 197–230.
8.
KatsikitisM. (1997). The classification of facial expressions of emotion: A multi-dimensional scaling approach. Perception, 26, 613–626.
9.
KimH.SomervilleL.H.JohnstoneT.AlexanderA.WhalenP.J. (2003). Inverse amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces. NeuroReport, 14, 2317–2322.
10.
KimH.SomervilleL.H.JohnstoneT.PolisS.AlexanderA.L.ShinL.M.WhalenP.J. (2004). Contextual modulation of amygdala responsivity to surprised faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1730–1745.
11.
KveragaK.BoshyanJ.BarM. (2007). Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13232–13240.
12.
KveragaK.GhumanA.S.BarM. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65, 145–168.
13.
LeDouxJ.E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
14.
LiddellB.J.BrownK.J.KempA.H.BartonM.J.DasP.PedutoA.. (2005). A direct brainstem-amygdala-cortical ‘alarm’ system for subliminal signals of fear. NeuroImage, 24, 235–243.
15.
LundqvistD.FlyktA.ÖhmanA. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF [CD ROM]. Available from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
16.
MorrisJ.S.FristonK.J.BuchelC.FrithC.D.YoungA.W.CalderA.J.DolanR.J. (1998). A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain, 121(1), 47–57.
17.
MorrisJ.S.ÖhmanA.DolanR.J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 1680–1685.
18.
NetaM.NorrisC.J.WhalenP.J. (2009). Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion, 9, 640–648.
19.
RafalR.SmithJ.KrantzJ.CohenA.BrennanC. (1990). Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: Saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. Science, 250, 118–121.
20.
SahraieA.WeiskrantzL.TrevethanC.T.CruceR.MurrayA.D. (2002). Psychophysical and pupillometric study of spatial channels of visual processing in blindsight. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 249–259.
21.
SaidC.P.BaronS.G.TodorovA. (2008). Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: Contributions of high and low spatial frequency information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 519–528.
22.
SpielbergerC.D.GorsuchR.L.LusheneR.E. (1970). STAI: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ.LeonA.C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT.A.. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249.
24.
VuilleumierP.ArmonyJ.L.DriverJ.DolanR.J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829–841.
25.
VuilleumierP.ArmonyJ.L.DriverJ.DolanR.J. (2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 624–631.
26.
VuilleumierP.HensonR.N.DriverJ.DolanR.J. (2002). Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 491–499.
27.
VuilleumierP.PourtoisG. (2007). Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia, 45, 174–194.
28.
WinstonJ.S.VuilleumierP.DolanR.J. (2003). Effects of low-spatial frequency components of fearful faces on fusiform cortex activity. Current Biology, 13, 1824–1829.
