Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing,Not by Speed,Time,or Capacity

Abstract

In dealing with a dynamic world, people have the ability to maintain selective attention on a subset of moving objects in the environment. Performance in such multiple-object tracking is limited by three primary factors—the number of objects that one can track, the speed at which one can track them, and how close together they can be. We argue that this last limit, of object spacing, is the root cause of all performance constraints in multiple-object tracking. In two experiments, we found that as long as the distribution of object spacing is held constant, tracking performance is unaffected by large changes in object speed and tracking time. These results suggest that barring object-spacing constraints, people could reliably track an unlimited number of objects as fast as they could track a single object.

Keywords

multiple-object tracking MOT crowding surround inhibition divided attention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

G.A.

Cavanagh

(2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16, 637–643.

Alvarez

G.A.

Franconeri

S.L.

(2007). How many objects can you track?: Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13), Article 14. Available from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/13/14

Bahcall

D.O.

Kowler

(1999). Attentional interference at small spatial separations. Vision Research, 39, 71–86.

Brainard

D.H.

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Carlson

T.A.

Alvarez

G.A.

Cavanagh

P.C.

(2007). Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 13496–13500.

Chakravarthi

Cavanagh

(2009). Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding. Vision Research, 49, 1638–1646.

Cutzu

Tsotsos

J.K.

(2003). The selective tuning model of visual attention: Testing the predictions arising from the inhibitory surround mechanism. Vision Research, 43, 205–219.

Doran

M.M.

Hoffman

J.E.

(2010). Target enhancement and distractor suppression in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 18, 126–129.

Franconeri

S.L.

Alvarez

G.A.

Enns

J.T.

(2007). How many locations can you select? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1003–1012.

10.

Franconeri

S.L.

Lin

Pylyshyn

Z.W.

Fisher

Enns

J.T.

(2008). Multiple object tracking is limited by crowding, but not speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 802–808.

11.

Green

C.S.

Bavelier

(2003). Action video games modify visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.

12.

Green

C.S.

Bavelier

(2007). Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of attention. Psychological Science, 18, 88–94.

13.

Hopf

J.M.

Boehler

C.N.

Luck

S.J.

Tsotsos

J.K.

Heinze

H.J.

Schoenfeld

A.M.

(2006). Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 1053–1058.

14.

Howe

P.D.

Cohen

Yair

Horowitz

T.S.

(2009, May). Distinguishing between parallel and serial accounts of multiple object tracking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL.

15.

Intriligator

Cavanagh

(2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216.

16.

Iordanescu

Grabowecky

Suzuki

(2009). Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking. Journal of Vision, 9(4), Article 1. Available from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/4/1

17.

Koch

Ullman

(1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.

18.

Liu

Austen

E.L.

Booth

K.S.

Fisher

Rempel

M.I.

Enns

J.T.

(2005). Multiple object tracking is based on scene not retinal coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 235–247.

19.

Liu

Jiang

Sun

(2009). Reduction of the crowding effect in spatially adjacent but cortically remote visual stimuli. Current Biology, 19, 127–132.

20.

Norman

D.A.

Bobrow

D.G.

(1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.

21.

Oksama

Hyönä

(2004). Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher-order cognition? An individual difference approach. Visual Cognition, 11, 631–671.

22.

Pelli

D.G.

(1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

23.

Pylyshyn

Z.W.

(2000). Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 197–207.

24.

Pylyshyn

Z.W.

(2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11, 801–822.

25.

Pylyshyn

Z.W.

Storm

R.W.

(1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 1–19.

26.

Shim

W.M.

Alvarez

G.A.

Jiang

Y.V.

(2008). Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 390–397.

27.

Toet

Levi

D.M.

(1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349–1357.

28.

Tombu

Seiffert

A.E.

(2008). Attentional costs in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 108, 1–25.

29.

Tsotsos

J.K.

Culhane

S.W.

Wai

Y.L.

Davis

Nuflo

(1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 507–547.

30.

Yantis

(1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295–340.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB