We tested hypotheses concerning the developmental roots of becoming the “weak-link” (less committed) partner in adult romantic relationships and the associations between partners’ absolute and relative levels of commitment and dyadic outcomes. We examined 78 target 20- to 21-year-olds who were involved in a romantic relationship and who had been studied since birth. As predicted, people who received lower-quality support from caregivers in toddlerhood or who were less able to resolve conflicts with a best friend in midadolescence were more likely to become the weak-link partner in a romantic relationship at age 20 to 21. Furthermore, lower commitment on the part of the weak-link partner coupled with greater discrepancy in commitment between partners predicted a greater likelihood that the couple would display hostility (rated by observers) during a videotaped conflict-resolution task when they were 20 to 21 years old. These findings are discussed from developmental and dyadic perspectives.
AgnewC. R. (1999). Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: Who decides what a couple does? In SeveryL. J.MillerW. B. (Eds.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 3, pp. 163–188). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
ArriagaX. B.RusbultC. E. (1998). Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 927–948.
4.
AttridgeM.BerscheidE.SimpsonJ. A. (1995). Predicting relationship stability from both partners versus one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 254–268.
5.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
6.
CarlsonE. A.SroufeL. A.EgelandB. (2004). The construction of experience: A longitudinal study of representation and behavior. Child Development, 75, 66–83.
7.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CollinsW. A. (1995). Relationships and development: Family adaptation to individual change. In ShulmanS. (Ed.), Close relationships and socioemotional development (pp. 128–154). New York, NY: Ablex.
9.
CollinsW. A.AguilarB.HennighausenK.HysonD.JimersonS.LevyA. . . SesmaA.Jr. (1999). Scales and coding manual for observed interactions in romantic relationships. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
10.
CollinsW. A.SroufeL. A. (1999). Capacity for intimate relationships: A developmental construction. In FurmanW.BrownB. B.FeiringC. (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 125–147). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CollinsW. A.van DulmenM. (2006). “The course of true love(s) . . .”: Origins and pathways in the development of romantic relationships. In BoothA.CrouterA. (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 63–86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
CronbachL. J.FurbyL. (1970). How should we measure “change”—or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80.
13.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.VeretteJ. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409.
14.
DuemmlerS. L.KobakR. (2001). The development of commitment and attachment in dating relationships: Attachment security as a relationship construct. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 401–415.
15.
EldridgeK. A.ChristensenA. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In NollerP.FeeneyJ. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FurmanW.WehnerE. (1994). Romanic views: Toward a theory of adolescent romantic relationships. In MontemayorR.AdamsG. R.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Advances in adolescent development: Vol. 6. Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 168–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
KelleyH. H. (1983). Love and commitment. In KelleyH. H.BerscheidE.ChristensenA.HarveyJ. H.HustonT. L.LevingerG.Peterson. . . D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265–314). New York, NY: Freeman.
18.
KieslerC. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
LundM. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting the continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.
20.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.
21.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586–604.
22.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
23.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
24.
RusbultC. E.ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
25.
RusbultC. E.CoolsenM. K.KirchnerJ. L.ClarkeJ. A. (2006). Commitment. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 615–635). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SimpsonJ. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264–268.
27.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS.LermaM. (1990). Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1192–1201.
28.
SroufeL. A.EgelandB.CarlsonE. A.CollinsW. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
SroufeL. A.EgelandB.KreutzerT. (1990). The fate of early experience following developmental change: Longitudinal approaches to individual adaptation in childhood. Child Development, 61, 1363–1373.
30.
TannenD. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
33.
WallerW. W.HillR. (1951). The family, a dynamic interpretation. New York, NY: Dryden Press.
34.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC.A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.
35.
WilliamsR. H.ZimmermanD. W.RichJ. M.SteedJ. L. (1984). An empirical study of the relative error magnitude of three measures of change. Journal of Experimental Education, 53, 55–57.
