Knowing one’s mate value (mate-value accuracy) is an important element in reproductive success. We investigated within- and between-sex differences in this ability in a real-life speed-dating event. A total of 190 men and 192 women filled out a personality questionnaire and participated in speed-dating sessions. Immediately after each date, participants recorded who they would choose as mates and who they expected would choose them. In line with evolutionarily informed hypotheses, results indicated that sociosexually unrestricted men and more agreeable women showed greater mate-value accuracy than sociosexually restricted men and less agreeable women, respectively. These results have important implications for understanding mating behavior and perhaps the origin of sex differences in personality.
AsendorpfJ. B.PenkeL.BackM. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25, 16–30.
BouchardT. J.Jr.LoehlinJ. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 3, 243–273.
4.
BussD. G.SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
5.
CronbachL. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.”Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.
6.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 193–197.
7.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
8.
GrazianoW. G.TobinR. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
HofmannW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176.
10.
KavanaghP. S.RobinsS.EllisB. J. (2010). The mating sociometer: A regulatory mechanism for mating aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 120–132.
11.
KennyD. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
KirkpatrickL. A.EllisB. J. (2001). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In FletcherG.ClarkM. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 411–436). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
13.
PenkeL.AsendorpfJ. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.
14.
PenkeL.DenissenJ. J. A. (2008). Sex differences and lifestyle-dependent shifts in the attunement of self-esteem to self-perceived mate value: Hints to an adaptive mechanism?Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1123–1129.
15.
PenkeL.DenissenJ. J. A.MillerG. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.
16.
PenkeL.ToddP. M.LentonA. P.FasoloB. (2007). How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions. In GeherG.MillerG. F. (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system (pp. 37–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
SchmittD. P.AlcalayL.AllikJ.AultL.AustersI.BennettK. L., . . . International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85–104.
18.
SchmittD. P.RealoA.VoracekM.AllikJ. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social gy, 94, 168–182.
19.
ToddP. M.MillerG. F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search. In GigerenzerG.ToddP. M., & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
