Spontaneous Gestures Influence Strategy Choices in Problem Solving

Abstract

Do gestures merely reflect problem-solving processes, or do they play a functional role in problem solving? We hypothesized that gestures highlight and structure perceptual-motor information, and thereby make such information more likely to be used in problem solving. Participants in two experiments solved problems requiring the prediction of gear movement, either with gesture allowed or with gesture prohibited. Such problems can be correctly solved using either a perceptual-motor strategy (simulation of gear movements) or an abstract strategy (the parity strategy). Participants in the gesture-allowed condition were more likely to use perceptual-motor strategies than were participants in the gesture-prohibited condition. Gesture promoted use of perceptual-motor strategies both for participants who talked aloud while solving the problems (Experiment 1) and for participants who solved the problems silently (Experiment 2). Thus, spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving.

Keywords

gesture problem solving embodiment strategy choice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alibali

M. W.

Bassok

Solomon

K. O.

Syc

S. E.

Goldin-Meadow

(1999). Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science, 10, 327–333.

Alibali

M. W.

Goldin-Meadow

(1993). Transitions in learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468–523.

Alibali

M. W.

Kita

(2010). Gesture highlights perceptually present information for speakers. Gesture, 10, 3–28.

Alibali

M. W.

Kita

Young

(2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.

Beattie

Shovelton

(2002). An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 179–192.

Beilock

S. L.

Goldin-Meadow

(2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21, 1605–1610.

Boncoddo

Dixon

J. A.

Kelley

(2010). The emergence of a novel representation from action: Evidence from preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13, 370–377.

Broaders

S. C.

Cook

S. W.

Mitchell

Goldin-Meadow

(2007). Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 539–550.

Chu

Kita

(2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 102–115.

10.

Church

R. B.

Goldin-Meadow

(1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.

11.

de Ruiter

J.-P.

(1998). Gesture and speech production (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

12.

Ellis

(1997). Strategy choice in sociocultural context. Developmental Review, 17, 490–524.

13.

Feyereisen

Havard

(1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 153–171.

14.

Goldin-Meadow

Cook

S. W.

Mitchell

Z. A.

(2008). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20, 267–272.

15.

Hegarty

Mayer

Kriz

Keehner

(2005). The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 333–356.

16.

Hostetter

A. B.

Alibali

M. W.

(2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514.

17.

Imbo

LeFevre

J.-A.

(2009). Cultural differences in complex addition: Efficient Chinese versus adaptive Belgians and Canadians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1465–1476.

18.

Kita

(2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In McNeill

(Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Lemaire

Callies

(2009). Children’s strategies in complex arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 49–65.

20.

Martin

Schwartz

D. L.

(2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 587–625.

21.

Pine

K. J.

Lufkin

Messer

(2004). More gestures than answers: Children learning about balance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1059–1067.

22.

Rauscher

F. H.

Krauss

R. M.

Chen

(1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.

23.

Schwartz

D. L.

Black

J. B.

(1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457–497.

24.

Siegler

R. S.

(1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Trafton

J. G.

Trickett

S. B.

Stitzlein

C. A.

Saner

Schunn

C. D.

Kirschenbaum

S. S.

(2005). The relationship between spatial transformations and iconic gestures. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6, 1–29.

26.

Wesp

Hess

Keutmann

Wheaton

(2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. The American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600.