This article is focused on the choice of a suitable turbulence model for simulations of an industrial pump's intake, from the perspective of accuracy and, partially, also the CPU time. Twelve steady-state and transient simulations were made on a fine computational mesh, using turbulence models such as: the shear stress transport (SST), the scale-adaptive simulation (SAS), the Reynolds stress model, the explicit algebraic Reynolds-stress model, the detached eddy simulation and the large eddy simulation (LES). The curvature-correction (CC) option was assessed for the SST and SAS turbulence models. The results were compared with the LES and with published experimental results. Although all the models could predict the main floor vortex, there were still some substantial differences. It can be able to conclude that it is better to use either the SST-CC turbulence model, due to its low-computational resources and far better results than the SST model, or the SAS-CC turbulence model, since its predictions are quite similar to the LES results. In the final step, good agreement with experimental results was shown for a longer simulation with the SAS-CC turbulence model.
ANSI/HI 9.8, American National Standard for Pump Intake Design, 1998 (Hydraulic Institute, Parsippany, New Jersey).
2.
ConstantinescuG. S.PatelV. C.Numerical model for simulation of pump-intake flow and vortices. J. Hydr. Engng., 1998, 124(2), 123–134.
3.
RajendranV. P.ConstantinescuG. S.PatelV. C.Experimental validation of numerical model of flow in pump-intake bays. J. Hydr. Engng., 1998, 125(11), 1119–1125.
4.
ConstantinescuG. S.PatelV. C.Role of Turbulence model in prediction of pump-bay vortices. J. Hydr. Engng., 2000, 126(5), 387–392.
5.
TokyayT. E.ConstantinescuS. G.Validation of a large-eddy simulation model to simulate flow in pump intakes of realistic geometry. J. Hydr. Engng., ASCE, 2006, 132(12), 1303–1315.
6.
Yulin, W., Yong, L., and Xiaoming, L. PIV experiments on flow in a model pump suction sump. Research report, Tsinghua University, Tsinghu, China, 2000.
7.
Škerlavaj, A., Vehar, F., Pavlin, R., and Lipej, A. Ahydraulic study of cooling water intake structure. In Proceedings of International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and dynamic problems inHydraulic Machinery and Systems, Brno, 14–16 October, 2009 (IAHR, Brno, Czech Republic), pp.143–153.
MenterF. R.KuntzM.LangtryR.Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. In Turbulence, heat and mass transfer 4 (Eds HanjalicK.NaganoY.TummersM.) 2003 (Begell House, Inc., New York, USA, Wallingford, UK)625–632.
10.
Hadžić, I., Hadžić, H., and Muzaferija, S. CASE 9.2: Periodic flow over a 2-D hill – Description of numerical aspects and turbulence models. In 9th IAHR/ERCOFTAC Workshop on Refined Turbulence Modelling, Darmstadt, Germany, 4–5 October 2001.
11.
Skoda, R. and Schilling, R. Computation of the Test Case 9.2: Periodic flow over a 2D hill. In 9th IAHR/ERCOFTAC Workshop on Refined Turbulence Modelling, Darmstadt, Germany, 4–5 October 2001.
12.
Hellsten, A. Description of the computations for the Test Case 9.2. In 9th IAHR/ERCOFTAC Workshop on Refined Turbulence Modelling, Darmstadt, Germany, 2001.
13.
Jang, Y. J., Temmerman, L., and Leschziner, M. A. Investigation of anisotropy-resolving turbulence models by reference to highly-resolved LES data for separated flow. In Proceedings of ECCOMAS CFD Conference, Swansea, Wales, UK, 2001.
14.
HellstenA.WallinS.Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress and non-linear eddy-viscosity models. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 2009, 23(4), 349–361.
15.
SpalartP. R.ShurM.On the sensitization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Sci. Technol., 1997, 1(5), 297–302.
16.
SmirnovP. E.MenterF. R.Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart-Shur correction term. J. Turbomachinery, 2009, 131(4), 041010.1–041010.8.
17.
FröhlichJ.TerziD.Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Progr. Aerosp. Sci., 2008, 44, 349–377.
18.
Spalart, P. R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S. R. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In Advances inDNS/LES, Proceedings of 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES (Eds C. Liu, Z. Liu, and L.Sakell), Ruston, Louisiana, 4–8 August 1997, pp. 137–147 (Greyden Press, Columbus, Ohio).
19.
SpalartP. R.DeckS.ShurM. L.SquiresK. D.StreletsM. K.h.TravinA.A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 2006, 20, 181–195.
20.
Menter, F. R. and Egorov, Y. A scale-adaptive simulation model using two-equation models. In Proceedings of 43rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 10–13 January 2005, pp. 1–13, AIAA Paper 2005--1095.
21.
Egorov, Y. and Menter, F. Development and application of SST-SAS turbulence model in the DESIDER project. In Advances in hybrid RANS-LES modelling. notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design, 2008, vol. 97, pp. 261–270 (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg).
22.
Davidson, L. Evaluation of the SST-SAS model: channel flow, asymmetric diffuser and axi-symmetric hill. In Proceedings of ECCOMAS CFD Conference, TU Delft, The Netherlands, 5–8 September 2006, pp. 1–20.
23.
MenterF. R.EgorovY.The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: Theory and model description. Flow Turbul. Combust., 2010, 85(1), 113–138.
24.
Tokyay, T. E. and Constantinescu, S. G. Investigation of flow physics of pump intake flows using large eddy simulation. IIHR technical report, University of Iowa, Iowa, 2005, http://www.iihr.uiowa.edu/products/pubvid/pdf/IIHR445.pdf.
25.
SpezialeC. G.SarkarS.GatskiT. B.Modelling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. J.Fluid Mech., 1991, 277, 245–272.
26.
Hellsten, A. New advanced turbulence model for high-lift aerodynamics. In Proceedings of 42nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 5–8 January 2004, pp. 1–18, AIAA Paper 2004–1120.
27.
WallinS.JohanssonA.A complete explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible flows. J. Fluid Mech., 2000, 403, 89–132.
28.
Tabor, G. R., Baba-Ahmadi, M. H., de Villiers, E., and Weller, H. G. Construction of inlet conditions for LES of turbulent channel flow. In Proceedings of ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, Finland, 24–28 July 2004.
29.
SchlüterJ. U.PitschH.MoinP.Large eddy simulation inflow conditions for coupling with Reynolds-averaged flow solvers. AIAA J., 2004, 42(3), 478–484.
30.
Grotjans, H. and Menter, F. R. Wall functions forgeneral application CFD codes. In ECCOMAS 98 Proceedings of the Fourth European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Athens, Greece, 1998, pp. 1112-1117 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
31.
BarthT. J.JespersenD. C.The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes. . In Proceedings of 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 9–12 January 1989, AIAA Paper, 1989–0366.
32.
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A., and Moin, P. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. In Proceedings of the Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research, 1988, pp. 193–208.
