Performance evaluation of a direct methanol fuel cell: combination of three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic modelling and one-dimensional diffusion layer mathematical modelling

Abstract

In this study, to define the distribution of CO₂ and methanol concentration in the anode channel, three-dimensional (3D) two-phase homogeneous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling for the anode channel and one-dimensional (1D) two-phase mathematical modelling for the porous media have been considered. In the anode channel, two flow configurations, single-serpentine flow field (SSFF), and parallel flow field (PFF) were studied. Here also, the effects of inlet mass flowrate, flow configurations, inlet temperature of aqueous solution, and inlet feed concentration on the CO₂ concentration in the anode channel and cell performance have been investigated. To define the interface boundary conditions between the channel and diffuser layers, the CFD modelling of the anode channel was coupled with the mathematical modelling in the porous media. The results show that the corner of the channel rib is the proper site for coalescence of CO₂ gas bubbles. The finer distribution of methanol concentration and less number of gas bubbles at the SSFF configuration have been observed. This leads to a better performance of the cell in the SSFF configuration relative to the PFF configuration. With increase of the mass flowrate, the molar concentration of CO₂ (gas bubbles) reduces and the cell performance improves. With increase in the temperature of aqueous methanol solution, cell performance will improve. The main reasons should be attributed to the enhanced activity of the catalyst and increase of diffusion coefficient of the methanol solution. The CO₂ gas bubbles will emerge more at higher temperatures, but it is clear that the effect of enhanced activity of the catalyst and increase of the diffusion coefficient of the methanol surmounts that of numerous CO₂ gas bubbles, thus leading to the improvement of the cell performance.

Keywords

direct methanol fuel cell CFD modelling mathematical modelling flow configuration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dyer

C. K.

Fuel cells for portable applications. J. Pwr Sources, 2002, 106, 31–34.

Cowey

Green

K. J.

Mepsted

G. O.

Reeve

Portable and military fuel cells. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2004, 8, 367–371.

Lin

W. F.

Wang

J. T.

Savinell

R. F.

On-line FTIR spectroscopic investigations of methanol oxidation in a direct methanol fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144, 1917–1917.

Cleghorn

S. J. C.

Ren

Springer

T. E.

Wilson

M. S.

Zawodzinski

T. A.

Gottesfeld

PEM fuel cells for transportation and stationary power generation applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1997, 22, 1137–1137.

Carrette

Friedrich

K. A.

Stimming

Fuel cells-fundamentals and applications. Fuel Cells, 2001, 1(1), 5–39.

Gasteiger

H. A.

Markovic

N. M.

Ross

P. N.

H₂ and CO Electro oxidation on well-characterized Pt, Ru, and Pt-Ru. 1. Rotating-Disk electrode studies of the pure gases including temperature effects. J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99(20), 8290–8301.

Iwasita

Electrocatalysis of methanol oxidation. Electrochim. Acta, 2002, 47(22–23), 3663–3674.

Markovic

N. M.

Gasteiger

H. A.

Ross

P. N.

Jiang

X. D.

Villegas

Weaver

M. J.

Electrooxidation mechanisms of methanol and formic acid on Pt–Ru alloy surfaces. Electrochim. Acta, 1995, 40, 91–91.

Thomas

S. C.

Ren

Gottesfeld

Influence of ionomer content in catalyst layers on direct methanol fuel cell performance. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 146, 4354–4354.

10.

Arico

Creti

Modica

Monforte

Baglio

Antonucci

Investigation of direct methanol fuel cells based on unsupported Pt–Ru anode catalysts with different chemical properties. Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 4319–4319.

11.

Narayanan

S. R.

Frank

Jeffries-Nakamura

Smart

Chun

Halpert

Kosek

Cropley

Gottesfeld

Halpert

Landgrebe

Proton conducting membrane fuel cells I. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, 1995Pennington, New Jersey.

12.

Ravikumar

M. K.

Shukla

A. K.

Effect of methanol crossover in a liquid-feed polymer-electrolyte direct methanol fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143, 2601–2601.

13.

Qiang

Xun

Xueyan

Yudong

Visualization study on the dynamics of CO₂ bubbles in anode channels and performance of a DMFC. J. Pwr Sources, 2007, 171, 644–651.

14.

Kulikovsky

Divisek

Kornyshev

A Two-dimensional simulation of direct methanol fuel cells, a new type of current collector. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 147, 953–953.

15.

García

L. B.

Sethuraman

V. A.

Weidner

J. W.

White

R. E.

Mathematical model of a direct methanol fuel cell. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech. Nov., 2004, 1, 43–48.

16.

Wang

Z. H.

Wang

C. Y.

Mathematical modeling of liquid-feed direct methanol fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2003, 150(4), 508–519.

17.

Wang

Z. H.

Wang

C. Y.

Chen

K. S.

Two-phase flow and transport in the air cathode of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Pwr Sources, 2001, 94, 40–50.

18.

Yan

T. Z.

Tien-Chien

Two-phase flow modeling of liquid-feed direct methanol fuel cell. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2008, 51, 1192–1204.

19.

Yang

W. W.

Zhao

T. S.

Three-dimensional two-phase mass transport model for direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 53, 853–862.

20.

Yang

W. W.

Zhao

T. S.

A two-dimensional, two-phase mass transport model for liquid-feed DMFCs. Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52, 6125–6140.

21.

Ya-Ling

Xiang-Lin

Zheng

Ying-Wen

Two-phase modeling of mass transfer characteristics of a direct methanol fuel cell. J. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2009, 29, 1998–2008.

22.

Yang

W. W.

Zhao

T. S.

Two-phase, mass-transport model for direct methanol fuel cells with effect of non-equilibrium evaporation and condensation. J. Pwr Sources, 2007, 174, 136–147.

23.

Shou-Shing

Ho-Chieh

Bing-Shyan

A novel design for a flow field configuration, of a direct methanol fuel cell. J. Pwr Sources, 2010, 195, 3224–3230.

24.

Dawesa

J. E.

Hanspal

N. S.

Familyb

O. A.

Turan

Three-dimensional CFD modeling of PEM fuel cells: An investigation into the effects of water flooding. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2009, 64, 2781–2794.

25.

Valeri

Danilov

Jongkoo

Hyuk

Three-dimensional, two-phase, CFD model for the design of a direct methanol fuel cell. J. Pwr Sources, 162, 992–1002.

26.

Triplett

AGhiaasiaan

S. M.

Abdel-Khalik

S. I.

LeMouel

Mc- Cord

B. N.

Gas–liquid two-phase flow in microchannels. Part II: Void fraction and pressure drop. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1999, 25, 395–395.

27.

Fukano

Kariyasaki

Characteristics of gas–liquid two-phase flow in a capillary tube. Nucl. Engng Des., 1993, 141, 59–59.

28.

Leverett

M. C.

Capillary behavior in porous solid. Trans. AIME, 1941, 142, 152–169.

29.

Baxter

S. F.

Battaglia

V. S.

White

R. E.

Methanol fuel cell model: Anode. J. Electrochem. Soc., 146(2), 437–447.

30.

Isbin

H. S.

Moen

R. H.

Wickey

R. O.

Mosher

D. R.

Larson

H. C.

Two-phase steam water pressure drops. In Proceedings of the Nuclear Science and Engineering Conference, 1958Chicago.

31.

Dukler

A. E.

Wicks

Cleveland

R. G.

Frictional pressure drops in two-phase flow. AIChE J., 1964, 10, 44–44.

32.

Kulikovsky

A. A.

Divisek

Kornyshev

A. A.

Two-dimensional simulation of direct methanol fuel cell a new (embedded) type of current collector. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 147(3), 953–959.

33.

Scott

Taama

Cruickshank

Performance and modeling of a direct methanol solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J. Pwr Sources, 1997, 65(1–2), 159–171.

34.

Parthasarathy

Srinivasan

Appleby

A. J.

Martin

C. R.

Temperature dependence of the electrode kinetics of oxygen reduction at the platinum/nafion interface—a microelectrode investigation. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1992, 139(9), 2530–2537.

35.

Senn

S. M.

Poulikakos

Pyramidal direct methanol fuel cells. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran., 2006, 49, 1516–1528.

36.

Ren

X. M.

Springer

T. E.

Zawodzinski

T. A.

Gottesfeld

Methanol transport through nafion membranes—electro-osmotic drag effects on potential step measurements. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 147(2), 466–474.

37.

McGlashan

M. L.

Williamson

A. G.

Isothermal liquid-vapor equilibriums for system methanol-water. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1976, 21, 196–196.

38.

Wilson, M. S. 1993, U.S. Patent 5,211,984.

39.

Mench

Boslet

Thynell

Scott

Wang

C. Y.

In direct methanol fuel cells. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, 2001Pennington, New Jersey.

40.

Yang

Zhao

Effect of anode flow field design on the performance of liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 50(32), 43–52.