Model-based selection of full-scale Wells turbines for ocean wave energy conversion and prediction of their aerodynamic and acoustic performances

Abstract

One of the most intensively studied principles of harnessing the energy from ocean waves is the oscillating water column device. The oscillating water column converts the motion of the water waves into a bi-directional airflow, which in turn drives an air turbine. The bi-directional axial Wells turbine as a candidate for oscillating water column power take-off systems was the object of considerable research conducted in the last decades. However, there is a lack of consistent data to support practical design considerations when pre-selecting a turbine for an oscillating water column power plant. Furthermore, to minimize the overall environmental impact of this technology requires the assessment of the aero-acoustic noise associated with a Wells turbine’s operation. The effect of cascade solidity and hub-to-tip ratio on the aero-acoustic performance of Wells turbine rotors is assessed systematically by numerical simulations and model scale testing. Based on the data from the study on these generic design parameters, new Wells turbine design charts were developed. For a given plant site, main machine dimensions are identified and a time domain model is used to predict the annual energy output and the annual equivalent sound power level. Maximum values of total-static peak efficiency and low sound emission can be achieved by selecting moderate values of cascade solidity and hub-to-tip ratio. On the other hand, high hub-to-tip ratio rotors in combination with high solidity are recommended for a maximum range of operation without stall, as the pressure head is varied. The designer of an oscillating water column system usually specifies selected operating conditions on dimensional turbine characteristics. Combinations of suitable rotor diameter and rotational speeds are selected using the design chart approach. When a fully operating, full-scale Wells turbine at fixed speed is assessed, higher cascade solidity maximizes the annual energy output at minimum acoustic emission. The drawback is a slightly larger rotor diameter when, e.g. compared with a lower cascade solidity.

Keywords

Wave power oscillating water column Wells turbine design charts time domain simulation acoustics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Falcão

AFO

. Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010; 14(3): 899–918.

Falcão

AFO

Gato

LMC

Air turbines. In: Sayigh

(eds). Comprehensive renewable energy 2012; vol. 8, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 111–149.

Wells AA. Fluid driven rotary transducer. Patent 1595700, UK, 1976.

Raghunathan

. The Wells air turbine for wave energy-conversion. Prog Aerospace Sci 1995; 31(4): 335–386.

Suzuki

Arakawa

. Influence of blade profiles on flow around Wells turbine. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 2008; 1(1): 148–154.

Govardhan

Chauhan

. Numerical studies on performance improvement of self-rectifying air turbine for wave energy conversion. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2007; 1(1): 57–70.

Tan CP. Predictions and experimental investigations on the peformance of Wells air turbine. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK, 1983.

Raghunathan

Tan

. Aerodynamic performance of a Wells air turbine. J Energy 1983; 7(3): 226–230.

Suzuki

Arakawa

Tagori

. Fundamental studies on Wells turbine for wave power generator. Report 1: the effect of solidity, and self-starting. Bull JSME 1984; 27(231): 1925–1931.

10.

Suzuki M, Arakawa C and Tagori T. Study on Wells turbine for wave power generator. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering Tokyo, Japan, 13–18 April 1986, pp. 560–565.

11.

Inoue

Kaneko

Setoguchi

Determination of optimum geometry of wells turbine rotor for wave power generator – part II: considerations for practical use. In: McGuinness (eds). Current practices and new technology in ocean engineering, ASME, New York: Ocean Engineering Division, 1986, pp. 441–446.

12.

Setoguchi

Kaneko

Inoue

Determination of optimum geometry of wells turbine rotor for wave power generator – part I: performance of isolated airfoils and rotors. In: McGuinness (eds). Current practices and new technology in ocean engineering, ASME, New York: Ocean Engineering Division, 1986, pp. 435–440.

13.

Gato

LMC

Falcao

AFD

. Aerodynamics of the Wells turbine. Int J Mech Sci 1988; 30(6): 383–395.

14.

Watterson

Raghunathan

. Computed effects of solidity on wells turbine performance. JSME Int J Ser B: Fluids Therm Eng 1998; 41(1): 177–183.

15.

Kim

Setoguchi

Kinoue

. Effects of blade geometry on performance of wells turbine for wave power conversion. J Thermal Sci 2001; 10(4): 293–300.

16.

Takao

Thakker

Abdulhadi

. Effect of blade profile on the performance of a large-scale Wells turbine for wave-energy conversion. Int J Sustain Energy 2006; 25(1): 53–61.

17.

Dixon

Hall

. Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of turbomachinery, Boston: Butterworth Heinemann, 2010.

18.

Cordier O. Ähnlichkeitsbedingungen für Strömungsmaschinen. Brennstoff-Wärme-Kraft, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft und technische Überwachung, Fachheft Strömungsmaschinen, 1955; 5(10).

19.

Kotb

. Design charts for Wells turbine. Wind Eng 1996; 20(4): 219–231.

20.

Raghunathan

. A methodology for Wells turbine design for wave energy-conversion. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 1995; 209(3): 221–232.

21.

Suzuki

Arakawa

. Design method of wave power generating system with wells turbine. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 2004; 14(3): 227–232.

22.

Kinoshita T. System simulation and optimum design method of OWC Wells turbine wave power generator. Report, Institute of Industrial Science Tokyo, 1986, p.36.

23.

Gato LMC, Falcao AFD, Pereira NHC, et al. Design of Wells turbine for OWC wave power plant. In: Proceedings of the 1st international offshore and polar engineering conference, Edinburgh, UK, 11–16 August 1991, pp.380–384.

24.

Curran

Whittaker

Raghunathan

. Performance prediction of contrarotating Wells turbine for wave energy converter design. J Energy Eng 1998; 124(2): 35–53.

25.

Thakker

Jarvis

Sahed

. Design charts for impulse turbine wave energy extraction using experimental data. Renew Energy 2009; 34(10): 2264–2270.

26.

Takao

Setoguchi

Kaneko

. Noise characteristics of turbines for wave power conversion. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2002; 216(A3): 223–228.

27.

Curran R. Ocean wave energy systems design: conceptual design methodology for the operational matching of the Wells air turbine. In: Proceedings of the 15th ISPE international conference on concurrent engineering, Belfast, UK, 18–22 August 2008, pp.601–615.

28.

Curran

Stewart

Whittaker

TJT

. Design synthesis of oscillating water column wave energy converters - performance matching. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 1997; 6: 489–506.

29.

Curran

Whittaker

TJT

Stewart

. Aerodynamic conversion of ocean power from wave to wire. Energy Conversion Manage 1998; 39(16–18): 1919–1929.

30.

Falcão

AFO

Rodrigues

RJA

. Stochastic modelling of OWC wave power plant performance. Appl Ocean Res 2002; 24(2): 59–71.

31.

Brito-Melo

Gato

LMC

Sarmento

AJNA

. Analysis of Wells turbine design parameters by numerical simulation of the OWC performance. Ocean Eng 2002; 29(12): 1463–1477.

32.

Madison

. Fan engineering (handbook), Buffalo, New York: Buffalo Forge Company, 1949.

33.

Takao M, Setoguchi T, Nagata S, et al. A study on the effects of blade profile and non-uniform tip clearance of the Wells turbine. In: Proceedings of ASME 2008 27th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Estoril, Portugal, 15–20 June 2008, pp.625–632.

34.

Inoue M, Kaneko K, Setoguchi T, Raghunathan S. Simulation of starting characteristics of the Wells turbine. In: AIAA/ASME 4th fluid Mechanics, plasma dynamics and laser conference, Atlanta, GA, 12–14 May 1986.

35.

Thakker

Abdulhadi

. The performance of Wells turbine under bi-directional airflow. Renew Energy 2008; 33(11): 2467–2474.

36.

DIN EN ISO 45641:1990. Mittelung von Schallpegeln. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag.

37.

Starzmann R, Carolus T, Tease K, et al. Wells turbine rotors: a comparison of the predicted and measured aerodynamic performance. In: Proceedings of the 9th European turbomachinery conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 21–25 March 2011, pp.1085–1095.

38.

Menter

. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994; 32(8): 1598–1605.

39.

ANSYS. ANSYS CFX-solver modeling guide, release 12.1. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, 2009.

40.

DIN EN ISO3741:2001. Bestimmung der schallleistungspegel von geräuschquellen aus schalldruckmessungen – hallraumverfahren der genauigkeitsklasse 1. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag.

41.

Starzmann R. Aero-acoustic analysis of Wells turbines for ocean wave energy conversion. PhD Thesis, University of Siegen, Germany, 2012.

42.

Mason WH. Applied computational aerodynamics. Lecture notes, Aerospace Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA, 2008.

43.

Ladson CL and Brooks CW Jr. Development of a computer program to obtain ordinates for the NACA 4-digit, 4-digit modified, 5-digit, and 16-series airfoils. NASA TM X-3284, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 1975.

44.

Abbott

von Doenhoff

. Theory of wing sections – including a summary of airfoil data, New York: Dover Publications, Inc, 1959.

45.

Brooks TF, Pope DS and Marcolini MA. Airfoil self-noise and prediction. NASA RP-1218, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 1989.

46.

Raghunathan

Ombaka

. Effect of frequency of air flow on the performance of the Wells turbine. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 1985; 6(2): 127–132.

47.

Starzmann R, Moisel C, Carolus T, et al. Assessment method of sound radiated by cyclically operating Wells turbines. In: Proceedings of the 9th European wave and tidal energy conference, Southampton, UK, 5–9 September 2011.

48.

Justino

PAP

Falcão

AFO

. Rotational speed control of an OWC wave power plant. ASME J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 1999; 121(2): 65–70.

49.

Falcão

AFO

. Control of an oscillating-water-column wave power plant for maximum energy production. Appl Ocean Res 2002; 24(2): 73–82.

50.

Tease K. ART3408. Internal report, Voith Hydro Wavegen, 2012.

51.

Alcorn R. Wave station modelling based on the Islay prototype plant. PhD Thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, UK, 2000.

52.

Daly J, Thakker A, Frawley P, et al. A 3D computational fluid dynamics analysis of the Wells turbine. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2002 21st international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, Oslo, Norway, 23–28 June 2002, pp.471–479.