The drive towards lower emissions in aerospace engines promotes more efficient and physically smaller engines. One way to decrease the size of the axial turbine is to minimize the distance between successive stator and rotor rows. This can usually have either a positive or negative influence on the turbine performance. The reasons for this behaviour are not currently fully understood. In this study, a novel approach is taken to find new insights into this design question by analysing the influence of different design parameters on the turbine efficiency behaviour. Several different turbines are analysed using the literature. For the first time, the performed analysis reveals the design parameters, which correlate with the different efficiency curve shapes. The correlating parameters are the stator–rotor axial clearance, stator pitch to axial chord ratio, turning velocity Mach number and rotor aspect ratio. The mechanisms behind the found correlations are further analysed to connect the physical phenomena with the design parameters.
GaetaniPPersicoGDossenaV. Investigation of the flow field in a HP turbine stage for two stator-rotor axial clearances, part I: three-dimensional time-averaged flow field. J Turbomach2007; 129: 572–579.
2.
Funazaki K, Yamada K, Kikuchi M, et al. Experimental studies on aerodynamic performance and unsteady flow behaviors of a single turbine stage with variable rotor-stator axial clearance: comparisons with time-accurate numerical simulation. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007, paper no. GT2007-27670. pp.703–711. New York: ASME.
3.
Jöcker M. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic vibration excitation of high-pressure turbine rotors. Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.
4.
HushmandiNBFranssonTH. Effects of multiblocking and axial clearance distance on performance of partial admission turbines: a numerical analysis. J Turbomach2011; 133: 031028–031028.
5.
MokulysTCongiuFRoseMG. Unsteady numerical investigation of the effect of wakes with Eddy shedding in different axial turbine aerofoils. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power Energy2009; 223: 1001–1016.
6.
GrönmanATurunen-SaarestiT. Design and off-design performance of a supersonic axial flow turbine with different stator-rotor axial gaps. Proc IMechE Part A: J Power Energy2011; 225: 497–503.
7.
ParkJChoiMBaekJ. Effects of axial clearance on unsteady secondary flow in one-stage axial turbine. Int J Turbo Jet Eng2003; 20: 315–333.
8.
VenableBLDelaneyRABusbyJA. Influence of vane-blade spacing on transonic turbine stage aerodynamics: part I: time-averaged data and analysis. J Turbomach1999; 121: 663–672.
9.
van de WallAGKadambiJRAdamczykJJ. A transport model for the deterministic stresses associated with turbomachinery blade row interactions. J Turbomach2000; 122: 593–603.
10.
CizmasPGAHoenningerCRChenS. Influence of inter-row clearance value on turbine losses. Int J Rotat Mach2001; 7: 335–349.
11.
RestemeierMJeschkePGuendogduY. Numerical and experimental analysis of the effect of variable blade row spacing in a subsonic axial turbine. J Turbomach2013; 135: 021031–021031.
12.
Yamada K, Funazaki K, Kikuchi M, et al. Influences of axial clearance between blade rows on secondary flows and aerodynamic performance in a turbine stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo, Orlando, Florida, 8–12 June 2009, paper no. GT2009-59855, pp.1039–1049. New York: ASME.
13.
GaetaniPPersicoGDossenaV. Investigation of the flow field in a HP turbine stage for two stator–rotor axial clearances, part II: unsteady flow field. J Turbomach2007; 129: 580–590.
14.
Yamada K, Funazaki K, Hiroma K, et al. Effect of wake passing on unsteady aerodynamic performance in a turbine stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo, Barcelona, Spain, 8–11 May 2006, paper no. GT2006-90783, pp.757–767. New York: ASME.
15.
ChangDTavoularisS. Effect of the axial spacing between vanes and blades on a transonic gas turbine performance and blade loading. Int J Turbo Jet Eng2013; 30: 15–31.
16.
GaetaniPPersicoGOsnaghiC. Effects of axial clearance on the vane-rotor interaction in a low aspect ratio turbine stage. J Propul Power2010; 26: 325–334.
17.
BusbyJADavisRLDorneyDJ. Influence of vane-blade spacing on transonic turbine stage aerodynamics, part II: time-resolved data and analysis. J Turbomach1999; 121: 673–682.
18.
Jeong E, Park PK, Kang SH, et al. Effect of nozzle-rotor clearance on turbine performance. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ASME joint US–European fluids engineering summer meeting, Miami, Florida, 17–20 July 2006, paper no. FEDSM2006-98388, pp.273–278. New York: ASME.
19.
DénosRArtsTPaniaguaG. Investigation of the unsteady rotor aerodynamics in a transonic turbine stage. J Turbomach2001; 123: 81–89.
20.
GriffinLWDorneyDJ. Simulations of the unsteady flow through the Fastrac supersonic turbine. J Turbomach2000; 122: 225–233.
21.
UmmitiMBSitaramNPrasadBVSSS. Computational investigation of effect of axial spacing on blade row interaction in a 1.5 stage axial flow turbine. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech2009; 3: 56–70.
22.
RoseMGJennyPGierJ. Experimentally observed unsteady work at inlet to and exit from an axial flow turbine rotor. J Turbomach2013; 135: 061017–061017.
23.
RoseMSchüpbachPMansourM. The thermodynamics of wake blade interaction in axial flow turbines: combined experimental and computational study. J Turbomach2013; 135: 031015–031015.
24.
Schum HJ, Szanca EM and Behning FP. Effect of stator-rotor axial clearance on cold-air performance of a turbine with transpiration-cooled stator blading. NASA TM X-67914, 1971.
25.
Sharma OP, Stetson GM, Daniels WA, et al. Impact of periodic unsteadiness on performance and heat load in axial flow turbomachines. NASA CR-202319, 1997.
26.
Sadovnichiy VN, Binner M and Seume JR. The influence of axial clearances and leaned-twisted guide vanes on the shroud leakage and turbine stage efficiency. In: Proceedings of 8th European conference on turbomachinery, Graz, Austria, 23–27 March 2009.
27.
KikuchiMFunazakiKYamadaK. Detailed studies on aerodynamic performance and unsteady flow behaviors of a single turbine stage with variable rotor-stator axial clearance. Int J Gas Turbine Propul Power Syst2008; 2: 30–37.
28.
Turunen-SaarestiTJaatinenA. Influence of the different design parameters to the centrifugal compressor tip clearance loss. J Turbomach2013; 135: 011017–011017.
29.
Grönman A. Numerical modelling of small supersonic axial flow turbines. Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland, 2010.
30.
BennerMWSjolanderSAMoustaphaSH. An empirical prediction method for secondary losses in turbines, part II: a new secondary loss correlation. J Turbomach2006; 128: 281–291.
31.
BennerMWSjolanderSAMoustaphaSH. Influence of leading-edge geometry on profile losses in turbines at off-design incidence: experimental results and an improved correlation. J Turbomach1997; 119: 193–200.
32.
YamamotoA. Endwall flow/loss mechanisms in a linear turbine cascade with blade tip clearance. J Turbomach1989; 111: 264–275.
