Numerical research on the mixing mechanism of lobed mixer with inlet swirl in linear radial distribution

Abstract

A detailed numerical simulation is presented to investigate the effects of inlet swirl and its radial distribution on the mixing mechanisms of a turbofan mixer with 12 lobes, by using the commercial ANSYS CFX solver and k–ω SST model. The core-to-bypass temperature ratio and pressure ratio were set to 2.59 and 0.97, respectively, giving the Mach number of 0.66 and bypass ratio of 2.65 at mixing nozzle outlet. In the core inlet, the swirl angle was raised from 0° to 30° in a uniform or linear radial distribution manner. The inlet swirl and its radial gradient did enhance the development, interaction, and dissipation of the vortices downstream of lobed mixer, resulting in accelerating the lobed jet mixing. When the inlet swirl was less than 20°, the total pressure and thrust loss increments of lobed jet were acceptable and no more than 0.26% and 1.57%, respectively, compared with the baseline case. The results also showed that the three-dimensional separation bubble on center-body and the backflows along jet axis at the rail of center-body, resulting from the swirling flow between lobes’ trough and center-body, were the dominant sources of total pressure and thrust losses for all cases with inlet swirl. And, reasonable radial distribution of inlet swirl could inhibit the aforementioned 3D separation and backflow, and thus limited the increment of jet mixing loss favorably.

Keywords

Lobed mixer inlet swirl streamwise vortices normal vortices jet mixing mixing nozzle

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Paynter GC, Birch SC, Spalding DB, et al. An experimental and numerical study of the 3-D mixing flows of a turbofan engine exhaust system. In: Paper AIAA-77-204, Los Angeles, CA, 24–26 Jan 1977.

Presz WM. Mixer/ejector noise suppressors.In: Paper AIAA-91-2243, Reno, NV, 7–10 Jan 1991.

Kuchar AP and Chamberlin R. Scale model performance test investigation of exhaust system mixers for an energy efficient engine (E3) propulsion system. In: Paper AIAA-80-0229, Pasadena, CA, 14–16 Jan 1980.

Power GD, McClure MD and Vinh D. Advanced IR suppressor design using a combined CFD/test approach. In: Paper AIAA-94-3215, Reno, NV, 10–13 Jan. 1994.

Kozlowski H and Larkin M. Energy efficient engine: exhaust mixer model technology report. NASA Report. Report no. NASA-CR-165459, 1981.

Rowe RK and Kuchar AP. Energy efficient engine: scaled mixer performance report (final). NASA Report. Report no. NASA-CR-167947, 1982.

Kozlowski H and Kraft G. Experimental evaluation of exhaust mixers for an energy efficient engine. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1980-1088, Hartford, Connecticut, USA, 30 June--2 July 1980.

Kuchar AP and Chamberlin R. Scale model performance test investigation of exhaust system mixers for an energy efficient engine (E3) propulsion system. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1980-0229, Pasadena, California, USA, 14--16 January 1980.

Shumpert PK. An experimental model investigation of turbofan engine internal exhaust gas mixer configurations. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1980-0228, Pasadena, California, USA, 14--16 January 1980.

10.

Anderson BH and Povinelli LA. Factors which influence the behavior of turbofan forced mixer nozzles. NASA Technical Report. Report no. NASA-TM-81668, 1981.

11.

Paterson RW. Turbofan forced mixer-nozzle internal flowfield I – a benchmark experimental study. NASA Contractor Report. Report no. NASA-CR-3492, 1982.

12.

Werle MJ and Paterson RW. Flow structure in a periodic axial vortex array. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1987-0610, Reno, Nevada, USA, 12--15 January 1987.

13.

Eckerle

Sheibani

Awad

. Experimental measurement of the vortex development downstream of a lobed forced mixer. J Eng Gas Turb Power 1992; 114: 63–71.

14.

Elliott JK, Manning TA, Qiu YJ, et al. Computational and experimental studies of flow in multi-lobed forced mixers. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1992-3568, Reno, Nevada, USA, 6--9 January 1992.

15.

Manning TA. Experimental studies of mixing flows with streamwise vorticity. M. S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1991.

16.

McCormick

Bennett JC

. Vortical and turbulent structure of a lobed mixer free shear layer. AIAA J.32: 1852–1859.

17.

Ukeiley

Varghese

Glauser

. Multifractal analysis of a lobed mixer flowfield utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J 1992; 30: 1260–1267.

18.

Ukeiley

Glauser

Wick

. Downstream evolution of proper orthogonal decomposition eigenfunctions in a lobed mixer. AIAA J.31: 1392–1397.

19.

Mao

SCM

Chua

. Kelvin-Helmholtz and streamwise vortices in the near wake of a single-lobe forced mixer. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2006; 220: 279–298.

20.

Mao

SCM

Zhou

. On the vorticity characteristics of lobe-forced mixer at different configurations. Experiment Fluid 2009; 46: 1049–1066.

21.

Schwartz IR. Jet noise suppression by swirling the jet flow. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1973–1003, Seattle, Washington, USA, 15--17 October 1973.

22.

Schwartz IR. Minimization of jet and core noise of a turbojet engine by swirling the exhaust flow. In: AIAA paper, AIAA-1975-503, Hampton, Virginia, USA, 24--26 March 1975.

23.

Carpenter

Johannesen

. An extension of one-dimensional theory to inviscid swirling flow through choked nozzles. Aeronaut Quart 1975; 26: 71–87.

24.

Ramsay

Miller

. Noise of swirling exhaust jets. AIAA J 1977; 15: 642–646.

25.

Knowles

Carpenter

. Subcritical swirling flows in convergent, annular nozzles. AIAA J 1989; 27: 184–191.

26.

Knowles

Carpenter

. Use of swirl for flow control in propulsion nozzles. J Propul Power 1990; 6: 158–164.

27.

Birch

Paynter

Spalding

. Numerical modeling of three-dimensional flows in turbofan engine exhaust nozzles. J Aircraft 1978; 15: 489–496.

28.

Kreskovsky

Briley

McDonald

. Investigation of mixing in a turbofan exhaust duct, Part I: analysis and computational procedure. AIAA J 1984; 22: 374–382.

29.

Povinelli

Anderson

. Investigation of mixing in a turbofan exhaust duct, Part I: computer code application and verification. AIAA J 1984; 22: 518–525.

30.

Barber

Murman

. Three-dimensional inviscid flow in mixers, Part I: mixer analysis using a cartesian grid. J Propul 1986; 2: 275–281.

31.

Koutmos

McGuirk

. Isothermal velocity and turbulence measurements downstream of a model multilobed turbofan mixer. Experiment Fluid 1989; 8: 183–191.

32.

Malecki R and Lord W. Navier-Stokes analysis of a lobe mixer and nozzle. In: AIAA paper, AIAA 90-0453, Reno, Nevada, USA, 8--11 January 1990.

33.

O’Sullivan

Krasnodebski

Waitz

. Computational study of viscous effects on lobed mixer flow features and performance. J Popul Power 1996; 12: 449–456.

34.

Mundt CH and Lieser J. Performance improvement of propulsion systems by optimization of the mixing efficiency and pressure loss of forced mixer. In: The 8th European propulsion forum “Affordability and the Environment- Key Challenges for Propulsion in the 21th Century”, Nottingham, UK, 26--28 March 2001.

35.

Georgiadis

Rumsey

Yoder

. Turbulence modeling effects on calculation of lobed nozzle flowfields. J Propul Power 2006; 22: 567–575.

36.

Anderson MG. Fluent CFD versus sovran & klomp diffuser data benchmark study. In: AIAA paper, AIAA 2008-665, Reno, Nevada, USA, 7--10 January 2008.

37.

Lei Z-J, Mahalatti A, Yang H, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of highly swirling flow in a model turbofan lobed mixer. In: ISABE paper, ISABE-2011-1822, Goteborg, Sweden, 12--16 September 2011.

38.

Wright A, Lei Z-J, Mahalatti A, et al. Effects of scalloping on the mixing mechanisms of forced mixers with highly swirling core flow. In: ASME paper, GT2012-70081, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11--15 June 2012.